You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc safe. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would be worth 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Talc Safe .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc-based product causes cancer. Talc safe.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company plans to pay different kinds of cancer patients in a bankruptcy settlement. Talc safe. J&J has claimed that its Talc products are safe and don’t cause cancer. It is attempting for a second time to resolve more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from arising in the future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims made in state courts by attorneys general claiming that J&J did not comply with states’ unfair practices as well as consumer protection laws by misleading consumers about the dangers of its talc products.

Several states had begun consumer protection lawsuits against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from moving forward in 2021. Talc safe. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched lawsuits in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas in LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL along with cancer sufferers as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a successful company like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at struggling debtors.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was rejected after the same arguments. A U.S. appellate court decided that LTL did not have “financial financial distress” and ineligible of bankruptcy protection. Talc safe. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again just over two hours after that dismissal, arguing that its second attempt was different due to the fact that it had less money and more backing for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates the state’s law enforcement authority by trying to unilaterally cap the company’s liability for state consumer protection laws.

Talc Safe

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained additional details about how the company would assess and pay cancer claims when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement will be $500,000 to those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45. Talc safe. The second payment would be $260,000 for patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer prior to age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement offers discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of using talc and other factors. Talc safe. For example the case of a woman who used daily talc products, had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer and was diagnosed the stage 2 ovarian cancer by age 55 might qualify for a $21,125 payout under the plan.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc opponents engage in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to handle the claims company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Talc safe. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the settlement, a different group opposes the deal.

Earlier this week, the opposition group, called”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case by arguing that LTL is not considered to be financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a few of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talc safe. “The law firms involved in their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that conflict with, diverge from, and are in opposition to the interests that their customers. We’ll submit an appeal in the appeals court.”

Talc safe. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who boasts more than mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J for bankruptcy, told the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J will fail.

“J&J issues press releases that boast about how amazing its plans are, but is requesting that details of the plan, such as what individuals with illnesses would be treated to,” Thompson said in the statement. “What does the company have to keep secret?”

Blog Talc JPML

Kaplan has instructed the sides to devise a second strategy for reorganization, under the supervision of two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free the company from the tens of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

In January of this year, a federal appeals court overturned the ruling, ruling that the company was not able to be considered in “financial trouble.”

After J&J’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed at the end of April J&J applied for its first bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether to grant the second bankruptcy.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases have been on hold. Talc safe. The company would like claimants to take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% support for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers that criticized the bankruptcy of the company as well, the U.S. Trustee, a branch that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting motions to dismiss the second bankruptcy case of LTL.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” The doors “are not open to any parties that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

To its credit, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its talc products, including its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market–first in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J seeks to avoid the costly business of going to trial. It has prevailed in most of the cases that were decided at trial, but certain losses have been extremely punitive.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri ended in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker but was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are appealing or resolved. Out of 41 trials, 32 have ended in winning for J&J, a mistrial or plaintiff verdicts that were reversed on appeal. Talc safe. The company also in 2020 moved to settle more than 1000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg stated at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Safe

Our lawyers handle baby powder cases in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Talc safe. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like baby Powder or Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page gives the J&J Talc Power Update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amount in these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who believe the deadline has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Safe

June 2 2023 Update: In the asbestos talc trial that took place in California yesterday, a few technical issues disrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Talc safe. Jurors from home on Zoom however, heard Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubts about the 70s research claiming asbestos was present in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff was able to introduce the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of additional minerals along with talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group informed J&J in 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc manufactured by the company, though at lesser than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Talc safe. The first trial since J&J decided to spin off its talc division, and then declare bankrupt is an important moment for the ongoing litigation drama. The trial began on Tuesday in the harrowing case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which lawyers on both sides believe is a tragic loss.

Opening statements laid bare huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. According to the attorney, the company tried to manipulate asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents from 1998 and 1994 that show fibers discovered in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma-related case and the unique issues it faces compared to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could inflict an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes of broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit vigorously defended their Second Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the case was distinct from the earlier filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion to J&J, the largest settlement ever in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Talc safe. The issue is not discussed: whether the magnitude of the settlement signifies that it’s an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over the 60,000 plaintiffs. It is difficult to confirm but is probably incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the first trial regarding its cosmetic talc items allegedly comprised of asbestos is set to begin jury selection on Monday, May 24, California in Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products and J&J denies. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now disputing who should be appointed to the role of a future claims representative, the role is crucially essential in resolving the Talc claims. Talc safe. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed in that position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs are protesting due to the fact that Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest which would prohibit her from taking on that role for the second time. The conflict stems from the issue that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the hotly litigated second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her ability to be neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy could be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J created for the talc bankruptcy has informed a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to settle the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceptive advertising regarding its talc products. Talc safe. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It is hard to imagine a scenario where J&J can push the settlements of baby powder through given these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer sounds like a lot initially, it will not appear appealing when you consider the math. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations, would not be able to pay victims more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. That’s not enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update: J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Talc safe. The group argues that J&J intentionally withdrew a $61.5 billion contract for funding in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision is a fraud transfer of right to compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the dismissal of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week this week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. However, in the meantime, it has approved an order calling for both parties to participate in a settlement mediation to see if an international settlement agreement can be brokered.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Talc safe. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm, and it was paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s most recent $29 million verdict on the state of South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner to talc claimants, rather than being seized from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of lawsuits.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch negotiations with lawyers who rejected the company’s $8.9 billion offer for settlement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps for their second bankruptcy matter. Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement could be made. Talc safe. However, it will require more money – billions of dollars – from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see the issue in the same manner their lawyer sees it. This second case of bankruptcy is bound to be a failure and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to decide if he will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded to have the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail litigation over talc products. The group representing claimants for talc filed a motion on Tuesday asking for the Third Circuit to consider their case and send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Talc safe. They also asked that stopped tort litigation against J&J allow the litigation to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered the possibility of an $8.9 billion agreement. The committee says that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J is a reason for the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J plans to file a response in the appeals court declaring the filing an “desperate and legally flawed effort” by a select group of law firms that have conflicts of financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A common question that people ask is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s a lot of money. However, there are lots of victims. Talc safe. And these are really good case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week when two talc cases have resulted in huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon ended in a verdict in the amount of $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma talc case was brought to trials at South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million on behalf of the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the most prominent suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30, 2023 Update: When J&J initially tried to take the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. The sum was ridiculously low. None of the talc plaintiffs were in favor of it. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they also have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Talc safe. However, 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans It’s a long and difficult process due to the sheer number of lawyers with vast inventories of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed in favor of the deal.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update: Talc Cancer victims have asked a judge to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially troubled. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Talc safe. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that LTL was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial distress.

The claimants assert that LTL’s third Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system, and that it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from firms representing an estimated 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s safe to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over what they believe is an $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Although the trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for at least 60 calendar days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Talc safe. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its strategy by filing another bankruptcy case.

April 13th, 2023 Update: The biggest story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims within the MDL collective action pledged to fight the settlement alongside those who claim talc. Why? They feel it’s not enough for 70,000 victims who have cancer. Talc safe. They argue that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or even litigate individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership group in the class action. They have amassed tens of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle today for what many argue is less than the victims deserve. Their argument seems to be two-fold. The first is that they claim the settlement, which is about 100,000 dollars per plaintiff – is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to argue. But their second argument has more force: the victims can not afford to wait any longer and need their money now.

April 12 2023 Update: People are wondering if J&J can file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. However, let’s attempt to explain it in simple terms.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to address both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. In other words, it believes it can pay less when there is the bankruptcy element which applies pressure for a settlement. Talc safe. In a quest to cover the 400-year span of American past, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlement payments more evenly and more efficiently than trial courts which are where litigants get significant award while others do not.

The basic tenet of the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of the profit-making company that has a subsidiary to take the legal liability and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated the company was financially difficulty because J&J offered unlimited financing.
This is why J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the contract and did not promise to provide unlimited funding for the litigation. The company claims that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. As if providing victims with less money will solve the overall issue.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who are against the agreement argue this by arguing that the plaintiff is the legal argument. Talc safe. They counter with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed the lawyers representing victims call it the most significant “fraudulent deal that has occurred in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. It is however a method of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023, Update Bloomberg provides an insightful piece on a law that has been passed within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of winnings. J&J has now offered to pay $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public information due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funding sources outside of the. This rule is intended to address the growing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you take into account state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has both pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are witnessing how third-party funding can level the playing field between people and large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s interesting to watch the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J suffered another setback this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay as J&J appeals an appeal at the U.S. Supreme Court. It has stopped thousands of talcum cases and prevented the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liability off into a bankrupt company over a year in the past. Talc safe. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal just a few months ago the stay was removed. J&J wanted to see it continued pending an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been added to the MDL in the last month increasing the number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into the amount J&J Talc products have cost the government in the many years.
in a letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc product for long while tax dollars utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the products. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc safe. J&J must begin making fair settlement offers for victims in order to put all of this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the most prestigious businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: In an earlier hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.