You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc a bad ingredient. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would make payments of the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Is Talc A Bad Ingredient .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion plan to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc items cause cancer. Is talc a bad ingredient.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company will pay various types of cancer patients in the bankruptcy settlement. Is talc a bad ingredient. J&J has said that its products containing talc are safe and won’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from coming forward in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million into an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed by state attorneys general alleging that J&J was in violation of state unfair business practices and consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the safety of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection actions against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from moving forward in 2021. Is talc a bad ingredient. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suits against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas, according to LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have decided to declare LTL’s bankruptcy unfinished in a joint move with cancer victims and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a successful business like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections designed for the struggling debtors.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was rejected after the same arguments. The U.S. appeals court determined the LTL had not been in “financial trouble” and thus not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Is talc a bad ingredient. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again just over two hours after the dismissal, arguing the second bankruptcy was different because it had less money and had a greater chance of securing an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the law enforcement powers of the state by trying to unilaterally cap the company’s liability for state consumer protection laws.

Is Talc A Bad Ingredient

LTL’s new filings also included additional details about how the company plans to evaluate and settle cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with terminal mesothelioma before age 45 and $260,000 for those diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the kind and severity of cancer, the patient’s age, previous the use of talc, and other aspects. Is talc a bad ingredient. For instance, a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer and was diagnosed with stage II ovarian cancer when she was 55 could be in line to receive a payout of $21,125 under the settlement plan.

Judge orders J&J and talc opponents to engage in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the move to conduct talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to handle the claims company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Is talc a bad ingredient. While one firm representing plaintiffs supports the offer, another group is against the settlement.

The previous week, the opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case by saying that LTL is not considered to be in financial distress.

“The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a tiny number of law firms to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan – a plan that the overwhelming majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Is talc a bad ingredient. “The law firms who filed this filing have financial interests that clash with, diverge from and are in opposition to the interests of their clients. We’ll submit an appeal an appeal to the appellate court.”

Is talc a bad ingredient. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which boasts more than patients with mesothelioma who have sued J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt will fail.

“J&J sends out press releases about how great its plans are, but is requesting that details of the plan, such as what the individual sick individuals would receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an email. “What does the company have to hide?”

Kaplan has directed the parties to create a restructuring plan, with the oversight of two mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free J&J from the hundreds of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

However, in the month of January, a federal appeals court overturned the ruling, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial financial distress.”

After J&J’s challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was turned down in April, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy just two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether or not to approve an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

With the 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases were placed in limbo. Is talc a bad ingredient. The company would like claimants to accept their settlement. J&J requires 75% of the vote for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the team of talc lawyers that criticized LTL’s bankruptcy plan, the U.S. Trustee which is a division belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting an application to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not accessible to those that lack a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to use the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their products containing talc, such as the famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market–first to be available in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the expense of going to trial. It has won the majority of the cases that have been decided in court, however certain losses have been extremely harsh.
A well-known trial in Missouri resulted in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are being appealed or decided. Out of 41 trials 32 have resulted in winning for J&J or a mistrial, or verdict of a plaintiff dismissed after appeal. Is talc a bad ingredient. In addition, J&J in 2020 negotiated to settle around 1000 cases at a cost of the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg reported at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Talc A Bad Ingredient

Our lawyers handle the baby powder litigation in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder against Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Is talc a bad ingredient. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as the Baby Powder and Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page gives the J&J update on the talc power litigation and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amount of the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Is the deadline for you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many who assume the statute of limitations has run out to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Talc A Bad Ingredient

June 2 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc trial that took place in California yesterday, a couple of technical issues disrupted the opening statements of the defense attorneys. Is talc a bad ingredient. Jurors at home via Zoom, did hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the 70s research that claimed asbestos was present in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff could introduce its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals alongside talc is expected. He also testified that his team had notified J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc produced by the company, although with less than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Is talc a bad ingredient. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J has decided to separate its talc segment and file for bankruptcy is a pivotal moment within the ongoing litigation story. Trial began yesterday in the heartbreaking trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma earlier this year. a diagnosis lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a harrowing tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the sharp differences in the two sides’ story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful methods in their research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson tried to alter the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents dating from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that fibers discovered in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma lawsuit and the unique issues it faces compared to most talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could result in an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc division vigorously defended its 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of the talc injury plaintiffs. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the case was distinct from the earlier filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J as the largest settlement ever made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Is talc a bad ingredient. There was no mention of how the magnitude of the settlement signifies that it’s an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over 60,000 claimants. It is difficult to confirm however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson & Johnson’s 2021 bankruptcy filing, the very first trial concerning its cosmetic talc products that are believed to containing asbestos is set to start jury selection on Monday, California with Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored location for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure from J&J’s products, an allegation that the company has denied. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be appointed to the position of future claims representative, the role is crucially critical to resolving talc claims. Is talc a bad ingredient. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation, was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed in that position again, but lawyers for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections because Ellis has a conflict of interest that should prevent her from taking on that role in the future. The conflict stems from the issue that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the controversially contesting second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capacity to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy is likely to be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company that J&J made up to handle the bankruptcy of talc informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to settle allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc product. Is talc a bad ingredient. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It is hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J will be able to push the baby powder settlements at these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer seems like a large sum at first, it does not look very appealing after you calculate the figures. The proposed settlement based on our rough calculations – would not provide victims with much more than $100,000 per instance. That’s not enough.

May 15, 2023 update: J&J could be facing lawsuit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Is talc a bad ingredient. The group claims J&J intentionally withdrew the $61.5 billion contract for funding in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action amounts to a fraudulent transfer of rights of victims’ compensation. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week this week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to reject the second bankruptcy filing of J&J subsidiary LTL Management. In the meantime, however, LTL Management has filed an order requiring both sides to participate in a second settlement mediation with the hopes of achieving it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement brokered.

May 5th 2023 Update: Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Is talc a bad ingredient. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the company and it is spending $1 million a month for legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million settlement on the state of South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for a fair distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being confiscated from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to the litigation.

May 4, 2023 Update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen negotiations with lawyers who rebuffed the proposed $8.9 billion agreement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the answer to settle these claims with J&J. A baby powder settlement could be completed. Is talc a bad ingredient. But it’ll need more money – more billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether to accept the proposal and not every client sees the issue in the same manner their lawyer sees it. A second bankruptcy proceeding is expected to be a failure and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to determine if she will remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested that J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group representing the claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday requesting for the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Is talc a bad ingredient. They also asked that lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J continue to continue.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year with a $8.9 billion deal. The committee argues that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J and J&J, requires immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J plans to file a response in the appeals court, declaring the filing a “desperate and legally inadequate attempt” by a few of law firms who have different financial interests.
May 1, 2023 Update: One question people keep asking is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s an enormous amount of money. But there are a lot of victims. Is talc a bad ingredient. And these are really good arguments for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently in two talc trials which have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon ended in an award of $18.1 million. The following month, a second talc mesothelioma case went to hearing within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million on behalf of the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the top suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: In the year 2023, when J&J first tried to bring the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to reserve $2 billion to settle the case. It was a ridiculously small amount. None of the talc plaintiffs were in favor of the offer. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they will allow a bankruptcy settlement and also has the backing of a significant section of the talc victims and their attorneys. Is talc a bad ingredient. But 75% of the plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans is not an easy task because of the number of lawyers who have large inventory of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed in favor of the deal.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update: Talc patients have requested a judge to reject their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, saying the company is not financially strained. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Is talc a bad ingredient. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that the company wasn’t eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial trouble.

The claimants contend that LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system and it’s being pursued in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from firms representing around 60,000 plaintiffs. It is fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over what they believe is an $8.9 billion deal.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Even though trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum period of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Is talc a bad ingredient. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s attempt to revive its strategy by filing a second bankruptcy case.

April 13, 2023: Update on the biggest update is about the $8.9 billion over the next 25 year period settlement offered. Lawyers representing cancer victims who are part of MDL class action MDL collective action promised to fight the settlement with talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Is talc a bad ingredient. They argue that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or litigate individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is dismissed.

However, there is a second group of lawyers outside of the leadership group in group action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated the equivalent of tens of thousands of lawsuits. They want to settle now in what many believe to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument is two-fold. First, they argue that the settlement of around 100,000 dollars per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to make. The second argument is more force: victims should now not wait and they want their money now.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are seeking out how J&J can go through bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. Let’s try to clarify it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to settle both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. Also, it thinks it can get a lower rate if there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to negotiate a settlement. Is talc a bad ingredient. Moving past the 400-year span of American history, the firm claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial award while others do not.

The main thrust in the 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making an affiliate to accept the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy – something Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. But it also said the company was financially difficulty because J&J promises unlimited funding.
This is why J&J took advantage of the funding unlimited part of the holding and didn’t promise to fund unlimited lawsuits. J&J claims that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address appeals court’s concerns, while offering funds to pay claims. In the hope that offering victims less money will solve the problem at hand.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue this argument by saying that it is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. Hyperbole was not spared the lawyers representing victims call it the biggest “fraudulent move of assets in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it’s a way to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023, Update Bloomberg provides an insightful article on a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the Class action suit. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a percentage of any wins. J&J has now offered an offer of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is made public because of an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rule aims to address the growing calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you combine federal and state Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits has its pros and cons. However, there is no doubt that we are witnessing how third-party funding can level the playing field between individual and big corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s interesting to watch the worm turning in this litigation. J&J suffered another setback this week when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay while J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision at the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay stopped hundreds of cases involving talcum powder and stopped any new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc liability into a bankrupt subsidiary over one year in the past. Is talc a bad ingredient. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal just a few months ago the stay was removed. J&J was hoping to have it continued pending hearing the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay being in effect, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been brought into the MDL during the month of March and brought the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation to determine how much J&J Talc products have cost the government in the years.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of ignoring the risks of its talc products over long while tax dollars spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Is talc a bad ingredient. J&J should begin to make fair settlement offers to victims, in order in putting this behind it. It is a stain on one of the most prestigious businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: At an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.