Johnson &Amp Johnson Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would provide $400 million to US state AGs. Johnson &Amp Johnson Lawsuit .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its larger $8.9 billion effort to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder as well as other talc items cause cancer. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm intends to pay different types of cancer victims as part of an arrangement for bankruptcy. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. J&J has claimed that its Talc products are safe, and won’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking a second time to resolve more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from being filed in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle claims brought from state attorney generals alleging that J&J did not comply with states’ unfair practices as well as consumer protection laws, by deceiving consumers regarding the dangers of its talc products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection cases against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from taking place in 2021. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought actions against Johnson & Johnson before then and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas, according to LTL’s court documents.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a successful firm like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections aimed at struggling debtors.
The first attempt by LTL to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was rejected after the same arguments. In the end, a U.S. appeals court decided that LTL wasn’t in “financial trouble” and was not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following the dismissal, arguing the second bankruptcy was different in that there was less money available and had more support for the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of state law enforcement authorities by trying to unilaterally cap the company’s liability for state consumer protection measures.

 

Johnson &Amp Johnson Lawsuit

LTL’s new filings also included more information on how the company would evaluate and pay for cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement will be $500,000 to those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the severity and type of cancer, the individual’s age, history of talc use and other factors. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. For example the case of a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary by age 55 may qualify to receive a payout of $21,125 under the program.

Judge ordains J&J, talc opponents to take part in settlement talks.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the plan to enter into settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to handle the claims company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the proposal, another group is opposed to the offer.

Earlier this week, the opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to dismiss the case argument that LTL can not be considered to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a few of law firms to try to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan–a plan that the overwhelming majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. “The law firms behind these filings have interests in finance that are in conflict with, contradict and contravene those they represent. We’ll submit an answer an appeal to the appellate court.”

Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that has more than 80 mesothelioma patients who have filed lawsuits against J&J for bankruptcy, told the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J failed.

“J&J sends out press releases about how wonderful its plans are, but is requesting that details of the plan, such as what the individual sick individuals would receive,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do they have to keep secret?”

 

talcumpowdercancerlawsuit

 

Kaplan has commanded the parties to create a reorganization plan, under the oversight and supervision of mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve the company from the hundreds of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.

In January of this year a federal appeals court ruled against the decision, deciding that the company could not be considered in “financial financial distress.”

In the event that J&J’s request to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was denied at the end of April J&J applied for its first bankruptcy about two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days in order to determine whether or not to approve an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

Through Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which the cases were in limbo. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. The company is requesting that claimants decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J needs 75% acceptance for the deal to pass.

In addition to the group of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy play in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee which is a division of the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not open to parties that lack a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to abuse the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no conclusive evidence that its talc products, including its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken its products off of the market first in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the expense of going to trial. It has won the majority of cases that have been decided during trial, however, some losses have been very punishing.
A high-profile trial in Missouri resulted in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are in appeal or concluded. In 41 trials 32 ended with a win by J&J, a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was dismissed in appeal. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. Separately, the company in 2020 negotiated to settle more than 1000 cases for the sum of $100 million. Bloomberg published at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Johnson &Amp Johnson Lawsuit

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like Shower to Shower Powder as well as Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page provides a J&J talc power litigation update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amount in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Is the deadline for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who believe that the time limit has expired to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Johnson &Amp Johnson Lawsuit

June 2 2023 Update: During the trial for asbestos-containing talc that took place in California yesterday, some technical issues halted the opening statements of the defense lawyers. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. The jurors, attending from home via Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubts about the 70s research affirming the presence of asbestos in their product before the trial was abruptly closed.

The plaintiff had the opportunity to introduce an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals with talc is expected. He claimed that his group was notified by J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc produced by the company, although with less than 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J has decided to separate its talc division and declare bankruptcy is a pivotal moment in the ongoing talc litigation saga. The trial began on Tuesday in the tragic case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year. which both sides acknowledge is a grave tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation process. As per the lawyer the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from 1978 and 1994 showing that fibers discovered in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance as we development of the trial. Despite the distinctive nature of the mesothelioma trial and its distinctive issues in comparison to other talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could be an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc business strongly defended the Second Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from victims of talc injuries. In an objection submitted to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the case differed fundamentally from the previous filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment of $8.9 billion from J&J, the largest settlement ever made in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. It was not mentioned how the amount of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms that represent over 600,00 claimants. It is difficult to confirm but is probably incorrect.

May 24, 2023 Update: Since Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial regarding its cosmetic talc products allegedly containing asbestos is set to begin jury selection on Monday in California within the Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good court for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation J&J denies. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are in a dispute over who should be appointed to the role of a future claims representative. This is a role that is critically essential in resolving the claim for talc. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed as the claims representative during the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed in that position in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are objecting on the grounds that Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest that should prevent her from assuming that position once more. This conflict is rooted in the possibility that Ellis was apparently involved in drafting the hotly contested second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her ability to be neutral. It’s true that the bankruptcy will be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company J&J made up for the talc litigation bankruptcy informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to settle the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc products. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It is hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J can push these settlements for babies at these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer sounds like a huge sum initially, it may not look great when you do the math. The proposed settlement based on our rough calculations, would not offer victims anything more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. This isn’t enough.

May 15, 2023 Update J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. The group argues that J&J intentionally withdrew a $61.5 billion financing agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, in order to create a false sense of financial distress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the victims’ compensation rights. They will investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the decision to dismiss the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application of J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. However, in the meantime it has approved an Order which requires both sides to participate in a new settlement mediation in the hope that an international settlement agreement can be brokered.

May 5 2023 Update: The talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. Over 2700 people have sued the firm and the company was paying $1 million per month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million settlement at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing for equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being confiscated through the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to litigation.

May 4 2023 update: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks on settlement with lawyers who turned down the company’s $8.9 billion agreement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared before a judge to discuss the next steps for this second case of bankruptcy. Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the solution to settle these claims for J&J. A settlement for baby powder can be achieved. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. But it will require more money, more billions of dollars from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to take the proposal or not and not every client views the issue the same way their attorney does. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to be a failure with Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to determine if she will close the case for the third time.

May 3 2023 Update The group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded an order from they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation regarding talc-related products. The group representing claimants for talc has filed a motion this week asking the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back an earlier court, with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. They also asked that the stopped tort litigation against J&J continue to continue.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered a $8.9 billion agreement. The committee argues that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J is a reason for immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a response to the appeals court declaring the filing an “desperate and legally deficient plan” by a handful of law firms that have conflicting financial interests.
May 1st, 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn off $8.9 billion. That’s of course an immense amount of money. But there are a lot of victims. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. They are a great case for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently by two talc-related trials that have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon led to an award worth $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma-related talc case went to hearing within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million for the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the most prominent suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: J&J first tried to bring the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to reserve $2 billion to settle the case. The sum was ridiculously low. None of the talc plaintiffs supported the offer. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they have the backing of a significant part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their attorneys. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. But with 75% of plaintiffs of talc are necessary for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road because of the number of lawyers who have massive stocks of baby powder lawsuits opposed in favor of the deal.

What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc patients have sought a court order to dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially troubled. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that the company wasn’t eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial distress.

The claimants assert that LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and it’s being conducted in bad good faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from firms representing about 60,000 potential people who are claiming. It’s safe to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on their disagreement over the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company sold a baby powder that contained a chemical that causes cancer. Although trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for at least 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed, and lawyers will begin preparing their cases. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. The judge expressed his doubts about J&J’s absurd attempt to revive its strategy by filing a second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 update: the biggest news is the $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients in MDL class action MDL collective action vowed to challenge the settlement talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough money for 70 000 cancer patients. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. These lawyers argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or pursue individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is thrown out.

There is a different group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership of that class action. These lawyers have amassed tens of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle today in what many believe to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be two-fold. They argue that the settlement – about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to make. The second argument is more force: victims should now not wait and they want their money now.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are asking how J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. However, let’s attempt to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to settle both present and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. In other words, it thinks it can get a lower rate in the event of a bankruptcy component that applies pressure to negotiate a settlement. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. In a quest to cover more than 400 years in American time, the business believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties because it distributes settlements more fairly and efficiently than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial award while others do not.

The basic tenet in this 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making an entity to assume the legal liability and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled the company was financially trouble due to the fact that J&J promised unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the contract but did not pledge to offer unlimited funding for cases. The company claims that its new financing agreements with its subsidiary addresses the concerns of the appellate court, while supplying funds for claim payments. As if offering victims less money will solve the overarching problem.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who do not agree with the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. Hyperbole was not spared attorneys representing the victims claim it the biggest “fraudulent move ever in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. It is however a method of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update Bloomberg is running an intriguing report on a brand new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder Class action suit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange for a percentage of any settlements. J&J is now offering an offer of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is publicly available due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rule aims to address the growing calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you take into account federal and state child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party financing in mass tort cases is not without its pros and cons. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field between individuals and big corporations in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turning in this lawsuit. J&J suffered another setback this week when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy to the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J started the controversial process to spin the talc debts into a bankrupt entity over a year earlier. Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it stayed in place until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that for the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay being fully lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been joined to the MDL in the past month and brought the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the amount J&J Talc products have cost the government over the decades.
in a letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc products for long while tax dollars used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlement proposals to victims to in putting this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the greatest firms.

February 14 2023 Update: At an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson &amp Johnson lawsuit. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Talc Asbestos Makeup – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Copy Of My Divorce Decree Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Talco Johnson’s – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Florida Divorce Online With Attorney – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Divorce Paper Easy Georgia – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Canadian Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Online Divorce In Pensacola Flordia – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • What Talc Is Safe – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • 12th Judicial Court, Desoto County, Florida Divorce Forms In Ms Word – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Free Divorce Attorney Advice Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  •  

  • About
  • Free Do It Yourself Divorce Forms
  • Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  •  

    >>> Johnson &Amp Johnson Lawsuit

    You May Also Like