You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Asbestos claim. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would pay $400 million to US state AGs. Asbestos Claim .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its wider $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc product causes cancer. Asbestos claim.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company will pay various types of cancer victims in the bankruptcy settlement. Asbestos claim. J&J has declared that its talc products are safe and won’t cause cancer. The company is trying for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from arising in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims brought in state courts by attorneys general alleging that J&J had violated the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws through misleading consumers regarding the safety of its talc products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection cases against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from taking place in 2021. Asbestos claim. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated suit for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas according to court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL as well as cancer patients and The U.S. Justice Department’s watchdog on bankruptcy, who have argued that a successful firm like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections designed for the struggling debtors.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was thrown out after similar arguments, when a U.S. appellate court determined that LTL wasn’t in “financial trouble” and was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Asbestos claim. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time just over two hours after that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different because there was less money available and had more support for the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates the state’s law enforcement authority by attempting unilaterally to cap the liability of the company in state consumer protection measures.

Asbestos Claim

LTL’s recent filings also provided more information on the way in which the company will evaluate and pay cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement will be $500,000 to those diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before age 45. Asbestos claim. The second payment would be $260,000 for people diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement offers discounts based on the type and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, history of usage of talc and other variables. Asbestos claim. For instance the case of a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had a family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with the stage 2 ovarian cancer by age 55 may qualify to receive a payout of $21,125 under the program.

Judge gives order to J&J and talc oppositionists to engage in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to hold the claims–the company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Asbestos claim. While one firm representing plaintiffs supports the deal, another group opposes the deal.

The previous week, the opposition group, dubbed the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to dismiss the case asserting that LTL cannot be regarded as in financial hardship.

“The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a few of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution, which that the vast majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Asbestos claim. “The law firms who filed the filing are pursuing financial interests which clash with, diverge from, and are in opposition to the interests they represent. We’ll be submitting an answer to the appellate court.”

Asbestos claim. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that includes more than mesothelioma patients who have filed lawsuits against J&J and J&J, has said that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J failed.

“J&J issues press releases describing how fantastic its plans are, but is requesting that details of the plan, such as what the individual sick individuals would receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What does the company have to conceal?”

Blog Talc JPML

Kaplan has commanded the parties to come up with another reorganization plan, under supervision of two mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release J&J from the thousands of lawsuits related to its talcum-based products.

In January of this year, a federal appeals court overturned the decision, ruling that the company was not able to be considered in “financial financial distress.”

When J&J’s attempt to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was denied in April, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy roughly two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to allow to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

Through two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which the cases were held. Asbestos claim. The company wants claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J would need 75% acceptance for the deal to go through.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers that criticized LTL’s bankruptcy plan as well, the U.S. Trustee, a branch that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file motions to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not open to any parties who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their products containing talc, such as its famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market–first on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the costly business of going to court. The company has won the majority of the cases that were decided through trial, though some losses have been harsh.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri ended in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drugmaker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are in appeal or concluded. Out of 41 trials, 32 of them ended in winning for J&J either through a mistrial or verdict of a plaintiff annulled after appeal. Asbestos claim. Additionally, the company in 2020 sought to settle nearly 1000 cases at a cost of 100 million dollars, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Asbestos Claim

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Asbestos claim. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as the Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in certain women.

This page offers an J&J Talc Power Update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amounts in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many people who think the time limit has expired to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Asbestos Claim

June 2 2023 Update: At an asbestos talc court trial held which took place in California yesterday, technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense attorneys. Asbestos claim. Jurors watching at home via Zoom but did not hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the science of the 70s that claimed asbestos was present in their product prior to the trial was abruptly closed.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff could introduce their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group was notified by J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc of the company, but at lower than 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Asbestos claim. First trial after J&J made the decision to split its Talc division and declare bankruptcy is an important point within the ongoing litigation story. The trial started yesterday in the heartbreaking trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma in the past year, an illness that lawyers on both sides agree is a tragedy of a different kind.

Opening statements laid bare huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire at Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. As per the lawyer the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos despite internal documents dating back to between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers found in tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance as we progression of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its distinctive issues in comparison to other lawsuits involving talcum powder, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could inflict an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes of broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has strongly defended their two-time Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the case was fundamentally different from the first filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion to J&J which is the largest ever settlement in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Asbestos claim. The issue is not discussed: whether the magnitude of the settlement indicates that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms representing over sixty thousand claimants. This is difficult to verify however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the very first trial on its cosmetic talc items allegedly that contain asbestos is scheduled to start jury selection Monday in California in Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable place for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation that the company denies. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be appointed to the post of future claims representative. This is a role that is critically essential to the resolution of the Talc claims. Asbestos claim. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed to that role yet again, but the lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing because Ellis has conflicts of interest that should prevent her from taking on that role once more. The issue stems from the fact that Ellis was involved in the creation of the hotly disputable second bankruptcy, which raises concerns regarding her capacity to remain neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy will likely to be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company that J&J put together for the talc bankruptcy disclosed to a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to pay the claims made by states accusing the company of misleading advertising for its talc product. Asbestos claim. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J can get the baby powder settlements with these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer might seem like a huge sum initially, it may not look great after you calculate the figures. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations, would not provide victims with much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15th, 2023 update: J&J may be in the middle of a suit from an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Asbestos claim. The group argues that J&J intentionally withdrew the $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision amounts to a fraudulent transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions as a result of the decision to dismiss the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application of J&J subsidiary LTL Management. However, in the meantime this bankruptcy court has issued an Order requiring both sides to participate in a settlement mediation hoping that an international settlement agreement can be come to fruition.

May 5th 2023 Update: The talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Asbestos claim. Over 2,700 people have sued the company and it has been paying $1 million per month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million settlement in South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being taken over from the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of litigation.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen settlement discussions with lawyers who have rejected Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion deal. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared before a judge to discuss next steps for another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A settlement for baby powder can get done. Asbestos claim. However, it will require more money – billions of dollars coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to accept the proposal and not all clients view the situation the same way their lawyer sees it. A second bankruptcy proceeding is expected to fail as Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine whether to dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded for the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail litigation over talc products. The committee representing talc claimants filed a motion on Tuesday, asking for the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case the lower court with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Asbestos claim. They also asked that the halted tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee argues that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J is a reason for an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a formal response to the appeals court declaring the filing a “desperate and legally insufficient move” by a small number of law firms with conflicts of financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A most frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their attorneys turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, that is an enormous amount of money. However, there are lots of victims. Asbestos claim. These are actually a good claims for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently by two talc-related trials that ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon ended in an award worth $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma-related talc case went to trial within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million to the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the most prominent suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: In the year 2023, when J&J initially attempted to pull the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to reserve $2 billion to settle the case. The sum was ridiculously low. There was no one among the talc victims who agreed with it. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and also has the backing of a significant section of the talc victims and their attorneys. Asbestos claim. But with 75% of plaintiffs in the talc category, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road due to the sheer number of lawyers with vast collections of baby powder litigations opposed towards the agreement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc cancer claimants have demanded a judge disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially strained. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. Asbestos claim. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial distress.

The claimants argue that the third Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant backing” from firms representing approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It’s fair to say that lawyers representing plaintiffs and victims are divided over what they believe is an $8.9 billion deal.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Even though trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for a minimum period of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Asbestos claim. The judge expressed his doubts about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy with another bankruptcy case.

April 13th, 2023: Update on the biggest story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients in the MDL group action pledged to fight the settlement along with Talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough to pay for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Asbestos claim. These lawyers argue that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or settle individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the leadership of that class action. These lawyers have collectively amassed many thousands of cases. They want to settle for what many argue is far less than what these victims deserve. The argument they make is two-fold. First, they argue the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to make. However, their second argument has more force: the victims can now not wait and they want to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are looking for ways J&J could file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. Let’s try to simplify it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to resolve both current and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. It thinks it will pay less should there be a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to negotiate a settlement. Asbestos claim. In a quest to cover 400 years of American history, the company claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlement payments more evenly and efficiently than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant awards while others receive nothing.

The main thrust in the 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making a subsidiary to take the legal liability and declare bankruptcy Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. But it also said that the entity was financially difficulty due to the fact that J&J promises unlimited funding.
So J&J decided to go with the unlimited funding portion of the holding and didn’t make any promises to offer unlimited funding for cases. J&J claims that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. It’s as if giving victims lesser money could solve the problem at hand.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is countering legal nonsense legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. Hyperbole is not exempt by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the most significant “fraudulent move in United States history.”

In spite of the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe this bankruptcy will be able to last. But it is a way of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement and keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update: Bloomberg has an interesting piece on a law that has been passed within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the Class action suit. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange for a share of any settlements. J&J is now willing that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is public information due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. This rule is intended to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you include state and federal Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has both pros and pros and. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field between people and big companies in court.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turning in this litigation. J&J has taken another blow this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place while J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy to the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J started the controversial process to spin the talc liabilities off into a bankrupt entity over one year earlier. Asbestos claim. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient some months ago, the stay was lifted. J&J was hoping to have it continued pending hearing the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance of the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16th, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action for talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc cases were included in the MDL in the past month, bringing the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the cost J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the years.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc products for years while tax dollars were utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the chemicals. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Asbestos claim. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlement offers to victims to the process of putting all this behind. It’s a mark on one of the world’s greatest businesses.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At a hearing today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.