You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Asbestos free talc manufacture. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will make payments of the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Asbestos Free Talc Manufacture .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc product causes cancer. Asbestos free talc manufacture.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company intends to pay different types of cancer patients in a bankruptcy settlement. Asbestos free talc manufacture. J&J has said that its products containing talc are safe and will not cause cancer. J&J is seeking the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from arising in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims made with state attorneys general claiming that J&J was in violation of state unfair business practices as well as consumer protection laws through misleading consumers regarding the dangers of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection actions against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from taking place in 2021. Asbestos free talc manufacture. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated actions against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands according to court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a profitable company such as J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at people with debt problems.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments, when a U.S. appeals court ruled the LTL was not in “financial distress” and was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Asbestos free talc manufacture. LTL made a new bankruptcy application just over two hours after the dismissal, arguing its second attempt was different in that there was less money available and more backing for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates state law enforcement powers by trying to unilaterally cap the company’s liability for state consumer protection measures.

Asbestos Free Talc Manufacture

LTL’s new filings also included more details on how the company plans to evaluate and settle cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The largest amount of money under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before age 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the nature and severity of cancer, the individual’s age, history of using talc and other factors. Asbestos free talc manufacture. For example an individual who was using talc products on a weekly basis, who had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer and was diagnosed with an ovarian cancer stage II when she was 55 may qualify to receive a payout of $21,125 according to the plan.

Judge orders J&J and talc opponents participate in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the strategy to engage in talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to handle the claims company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Asbestos free talc manufacture. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs is in favor of the deal, another group opposes the move.

In the last week, an opposition group, known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to dismiss the case by argument that LTL can not be considered to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a tiny number of law firms to try to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Asbestos free talc manufacture. “The law firms who filed these filings have interests in finance that do not align with, contradict and are in opposition to the interests they represent. We’ll submit a response an appeal to the appellate court.”

Asbestos free talc manufacture. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which is home to more than mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J claimed that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt failed.

“J&J publishes press release that boast about how amazing its plan is while simultaneously demanding that plan details–including what the individual sick individuals would receive,” Thompson said in the statement. “What do J&J have to conceal?”

Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new strategy for reorganization, under the oversight of two mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free the company from the thousands of lawsuits over its talcum products.

However, in January of this year, an appeals court in the United States overturned the verdict, ruling that the company was not able to be considered in “financial financial distress.”

When J&J’s attempt to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed on April 1, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether to allow another bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.

In the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were put on hold. Asbestos free talc manufacture. The company is requesting that claimants vote on accepting their settlement. J&J would need 75% of the vote for the deal to pass.

Alongside the group of talc lawyers who criticised the bankruptcy of the company, the U.S. Trustee, a branch that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file an application to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a recent filing, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not open to any parties that do not have a legitimate objective or seek to abuse the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its products containing talc, such as the famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market–first in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J seeks to avoid the expense of going to trial. It has prevailed in most of the cases decided through trial, though certain losses have been extremely punitive.
A high-profile trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker and was later lowered to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are in appeal or resolved. Out of 41 trials, 32 have resulted in an outcome for J&J either through a mistrial or plaintiff verdict that was dismissed on appeal. Asbestos free talc manufacture. Separately, the company has announced plans to settle around 1000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg stated at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Asbestos Free Talc Manufacture

Our lawyers handle the baby powder litigation in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Asbestos free talc manufacture. The lawsuits allege that prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower which can cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page gives an J&J talc power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amount of the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many people who think the deadline has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or get a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Asbestos Free Talc Manufacture

June 2 2023 Update: At the trial for asbestos-containing talc in California yesterday, some technical issues interrupted the opening statement by the defense lawyers. Asbestos free talc manufacture. Jurors watching from their homes via Zoom but did not hear Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express skepticism about the 70s science affirming the presence of asbestos in their product before the opening was abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff was able to present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the occurrence of other minerals alongside the talc mineral is a given. He said that his team had notified J&J in 1971 of the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc manufactured by the company, though with less than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Asbestos free talc manufacture. The first trial since J&J took the decision to disband its talc division and declare bankruptcy marks an important turning point of the ongoing lawsuit story. Trial began yesterday in the tragic case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements laid bare sharp differences in the two sides’ story. The attorney representing the plaintiff took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceitful tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. As per the lawyer, the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from 1978 and 1994 showing that asbestos fibers found in tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance with the course of this trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its unique challenges compared to most talcum powder lawsuits A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could inflict an enormous setback for J&J’s expectations of widespread acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has vigorously defended its 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing was fundamentally different from the previous filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment to $8.9 billion from J&J the largest settlement ever made in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Asbestos free talc manufacture. There was no mention of how the amount of the settlement means it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from various plaintiffs’ law firms representing over the 60,000 plaintiffs. It is difficult to confirm but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the very first trial concerning the cosmetic talc products it claims to containing asbestos is set to start jury selection on Monday, California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good court for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure in J&J’s product, an allegation the company is denying. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are in a dispute over who should be appointed to the role of future claims representative. This is an important role essential in resolving the Talc claims. Asbestos free talc manufacture. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team would like Ellis to be named to the position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs are protesting on the grounds that Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest that would prevent her from being appointed to that post once more. The issue stems from the possibility that Ellis was apparently involved in drafting the hotly contested second bankruptcy, which raises concerns regarding her capacity to remain neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy could be dismissed regardless.

May 17th, 2023 Update: The pretend company J&J created for the talc bankruptcy told the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to pay the allegations made by states who accuse J&J of misleading marketing for its talc products. Asbestos free talc manufacture. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It is hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J will be able to push the baby powder settlements in these figures. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer may seem like a lot at first, it does not appear appealing when you look at the numbers. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations – would not offer victims anything more than $100,000 per instance. It’s not enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update: J&J could be facing lawsuit from an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Asbestos free talc manufacture. The group claims that J&J deliberately withdrew the $61.5 billion contract for funding in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They are planning to study J&J’s actions following of the decision to dismiss the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10, 2023 Update: Next week next week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy application that was filed by J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime, however this bankruptcy court has issued an Order that requires both parties to take part in a new settlement negotiation hoping that a global settlement deal can been reached.

May 5, 2023 Update: Talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Asbestos free talc manufacture. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the company and it has been spending $1 million a month to defend itself. The company’s most recent $29 million settlement at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for a fair distribution of assets between the claimants of talc instead of being taken from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to lawsuits.

May 4 2023 update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch negotiations with lawyers who rebuffed the proposed $8.9 billion offer for settlement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps in this second case of bankruptcy. Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A settlement for baby powder can be achieved. Asbestos free talc manufacture. However, it’ll require more money, more billions of dollars from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to take the proposal or not and not all clients see the issue in the same manner their lawyer does. A second bankruptcy proceeding is bound to be a failure the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide whether to close the case for the third time.

May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked to have they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation regarding talc-related products. The group of talc claimants has filed a motion this week, asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and send it back the lower court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Asbestos free talc manufacture. They also requested that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J be allowed to continue.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year with the possibility of an $8.9 billion agreement. The committee says that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J is a reason for the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J plans to file a response to the appeals court calling the request a “desperate and legally insufficient move” by a select group of law firms with conflicting financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how could the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s an enormous amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. Asbestos free talc manufacture. And these are really good cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently with two talc trials have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon ended in a verdict of $18.1 million. In the same month, a different talc mesothelioma case went to trials within South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million in favor of plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the leading suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30th, 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. It was a ridiculously small amount. None of the talc plaintiffs agreed with it. This time around, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and also has the support of a substantial segment of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Asbestos free talc manufacture. But with 75% of talc plaintiffs, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans is not an easy task due to the sheer number of lawyers with huge collections of baby powder litigations opposed towards the agreement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update: Talc plaintiffs have sought a court order to reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially distressed. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. Asbestos free talc manufacture. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company wasn’t eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it did not show financial trouble.

The plaintiffs argue that LTL’s Second Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system, and that the case is being handled in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant backing” from the firms that represent approximately 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s safe to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims are divided over what they believe is an $8.9 billion deal.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has decided the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although the trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum period of 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Asbestos free talc manufacture. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its plan with another bankruptcy case.

April 13th, 2023: Update on the most important story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims who are part of the MDL class action have promised to fight the settlement with the talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough for 70,000 victims who have cancer. Asbestos free talc manufacture. These lawyers argue that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or pursue individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is thrown out.

There is a different set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership of the class action. These lawyers have amassed many thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle the case now in what many believe to be less than the victims deserve. The argument they make is twofold. The first is that they claim the settlement, which is about the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

It’s a difficult argument to make. However, their second argument has more substance: the victims will now not wait and they want to get their money right now.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are seeking out how J&J can file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and complicated. However, let’s attempt to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to deal with both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. In other words, it thinks it will pay less if there is the bankruptcy element which applies pressure for a settlement. Asbestos free talc manufacture. Going back to hundreds of years of American past, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties by distributing settlement payments more equitably and efficiently than trial courts, which are where litigants get significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The main thrust of the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of one that makes a profit, but an affiliate to accept the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the subsidiary was not financially crisis because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Then J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding aspect of the deal and did not promise to offer unlimited funding for lawsuits. The company says that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address concerns of the appellate court, while providing funds for claims. In the hope that offering victims less money would solve the overarching problem.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. Hyperbole is not exempt attorneys representing the victims claim this the biggest “fraudulent deal of assets in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it is a way of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg has an interesting article about a new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder Class action suit. Litigation funders Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a share of any settlements. J&J is now offering an offer of $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is publicly available due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funders outside the state. The rules aim to address the growing calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you combine state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has both pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party funding could level the playing field between individual and big corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turn in this case. J&J took another hit this week, when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place as J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling before the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc liabilities off into a bankrupt subsidiary over a year ago. Asbestos free talc manufacture. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid a few months ago, the stay was removed. J&J had hoped to have it remain in effect until the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action for talcum powder MDL within a year. Seven new talc lawsuits were added to the MDL over the last month and brought the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update The following information is available: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into the amount J&J product containing talc has cost the government in the years.
in a letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc product for long while tax dollars spent treating those injured by exposure to the product. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Asbestos free talc manufacture. J&J needs to start making fair settlement offers to victims, in order the process of putting all this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the top businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: At an earlier hearing at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.