You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Asbestos vs talc. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will provide 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Asbestos Vs Talc .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc ingredients cause cancer. Asbestos vs talc.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company will pay various types of cancer victims in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Asbestos vs talc. J&J has stated that its Talc products are safe and won’t cause cancer. The company is trying for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from arising in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to a separate trust for lawsuits filed from state attorney generals alleging that J&J was in violation of laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers regarding the security of its talc-based products.

Several states had begun consumer protection actions against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from taking place in 2021. Asbestos vs talc. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched suits for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas according to court documents.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy, joining cancer victims and their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a successful company such as J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections meant for struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court determined in favor of LTL wasn’t in “financial difficulty” and ineligible under bankruptcy law. Asbestos vs talc. LTL made a new bankruptcy application in just two hours following the decision to dismiss, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different as it had less money and had a greater chance of securing an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the law enforcement powers of the state by seeking to unilaterally limit LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.

Asbestos Vs Talc

LTL’s new filings also included more details on how the company would assess and settle cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

The proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, the patient’s age, previous usage of talc and other variables. Asbestos vs talc. For example an individual who was using talc products on a weekly basis, who had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer, and was diagnosed with stage II ovarian cancer at age 55 may qualify to receive a payment of $21,125 according to the plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc opponents participate in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the plan to hold talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to settle claims – the company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Asbestos vs talc. While a firm representing plaintiffs agree with the deal, another group opposes the move.

Earlier this week, the opposition group, known as”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to dismiss this case argument that LTL is not considered to be in financial distress.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a few of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Asbestos vs talc. “The law firms involved in the filing are pursuing financial interests which do not align with, differ from and are in opposition to the interests they represent. We’ll be submitting a response in the appeals court.”

Asbestos vs talc. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who includes more than patients with mesothelioma who have sued J&J, said that the company’s second bankruptcy try failed.

“J&J sends out press releases that boast about how amazing the plan is but simultaneously demanding that plan details–including what the individual sick individuals would receive,” Thompson said in the statement. “What do J&J have to conceal?”

Kaplan has instructed the sides to come up with another restructuring plan, with supervision of two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free the company from the thousands of lawsuits concerning its talcum products.

But in the month of January, an appeals court in the United States overturned the ruling, ruling that the business could not be considered to be in “financial distress.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was denied at the end of April J&J declared bankruptcy just two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days in order to determine whether or not to accept another bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

In the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has purchased 19 months of which cases have been on hold. Asbestos vs talc. The company wants claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J would need 75% of the vote in order for the agreement to be accepted.

Alongside the group of talc lawyers who criticised the company’s bankruptcy and the U.S. Trustee, an arm belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting an appeal to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a recent filing, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not open to parties that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy goal or who seek to use bankruptcy to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its Talc-based products, such as its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products from the market and will first launch them to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the expense of going to court. J&J has won the majority of the cases decided through trial, though some losses have been very harsh.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri ended in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine cases involving talc, which are being appealed or settled. Out of 41 trials, 32 of them ended in the favor of J&J either through a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was dismissed upon appeal. Asbestos vs talc. Separately, the company in 2020 moved to settle more than 1,000 cases worth 100 million dollars, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Asbestos Vs Talc

Our lawyers are handling baby powder cases in all 50 states. The lawsuits involving talcum powder against Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Asbestos vs talc. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including Shower to Shower Powder and Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page provides a J&J Talc Power Update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amounts of these ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Have you reached the deadline by which you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who assume the statute of limitations has run out to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a no-cost and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Asbestos Vs Talc

June 2 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc case at the trial in California yesterday, technical issues interrupted the opening statements made by defense attorneys. Asbestos vs talc. Jurors watching from home on Zoom and hearing the Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubts about the 70s research asserting the presence of asbestos in their product prior to the proceedings abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff had the opportunity to present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group advised J&J in 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc manufactured by the company, though at just 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Asbestos vs talc. First trial after J&J has decided to separate its talc division and declare bankruptcy is a pivotal moment for the ongoing litigation saga. Trial started on Monday in the tragic case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which both sides of the argument agree is a grave tragedy.

Opening statements revealed the stark differences in each side’s story. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers that were found in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and the unique issues it faces compared to most talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could inflict an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31, 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit strongly defended the two-time Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an objection submitted to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing was fundamentally different from the earlier filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment to $8.9 billion to J&J which is the largest settlement ever in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Asbestos vs talc. There was no mention of how this amount signifies that it’s a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms that represent over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is hard to verify but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the very first trial involving its cosmetic talc products that are believed to with asbestos content is scheduled to start jury selection Monday, May 24, California within the Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good jurisdiction for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure in J&J’s product, an allegation the company does not deny. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently fighting over who should be appointed to the role of the claims representative in the future, the role is crucially important to resolving the claims involving talc. Asbestos vs talc. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation was appointed the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to that role again, but lawyers for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections on the grounds that Ellis has conflicts of interest that would prevent her from being appointed to that post again. The issue stems from the fact that Ellis was reportedly involved in the drafting of the highly contested second bankruptcy, raising doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy is likely to get dismissed anyway.

May 17th, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J made up to handle the bankruptcy of talc told the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to pay the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc-based products. Asbestos vs talc. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine the scenario in which J&J can push these settlements for babies with these numbers. Although J&J’s $8.5 billion offer seems like a large sum initially, it may not look very appealing when you look at the numbers. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations would not be able to pay victims more than a median settlement of $100,000 per case. It’s not enough.

May 15th, 2023 update: J&J could be facing suit from an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Asbestos vs talc. The group contends that J&J deliberately withdrew the $61.5 billion funding agreement that it had with its company subsidiary LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They plan to explore J&J’s actions after the announcement of the dismissal of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week next week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing that was filed by J&J company LTL Management. In the meantime, LTL Management has filed an Order requiring both sides to take part in a new settlement mediation hoping that an international settlement agreement can be been reached.

May 5, 2023 Update: Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Asbestos vs talc. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the firm and it is paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million verdict that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for an equitable distribution of assets between the claimants of talc instead of being confiscated by the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also declared bankruptcy because of the litigation.

May 4 2023, Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen talks on settlement with lawyers who have rejected the company’s proposed $8.9 billion agreement. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps for another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the best way to settle these claims for J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be achieved. Asbestos vs talc. However, it’ll require more money, more billions of dollars – by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether to accept the proposal and not all clients view the issue the same way their lawyer sees it. A second bankruptcy proceeding is destined to fail the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine whether to remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3, 2023 Update The group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked that J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is a bid to stop litigation over talc products. The committee representing talc claimants filed a motion on Tuesday, asking that the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Asbestos vs talc. They also requested that the halted tort litigation against J&J allow the litigation to continue.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering a $8.9 billion deal. The committee says that the recent decision allowing LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J and J&J, requires an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a formal response to the appeals court characterizing the filing as an “desperate and legally inadequate plan” by a handful of law firms that have competing financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how could the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s a lot of money. There are a lot of victims. Asbestos vs talc. These are an excellent case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week when two talc cases resulted in big verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon led to the verdict in the amount of $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma-related talc case went to trial in South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million in favor of plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the top suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to set aside $2 billion for settlements. It was a ridiculously small amount. The talc plaintiffs had not were in favor of the proposal. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Asbestos vs talc. However, 75% of plaintiffs in the talc category, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans It’s a long and difficult process because of the number of lawyers who have massive stocks of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed to the settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc plaintiffs have asked a judge to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially distressed. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Asbestos vs talc. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial trouble.

The claimants assert that the second Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being conducted in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from the firms that represent about 60,000 potential people who are claiming. It’s fair to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and the victims are split over the $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Although trials for Talc lawsuits are suspended for a minimum period of 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Asbestos vs talc. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s attempt to revive its strategy by filing another bankruptcy case.

April 13 2023: Update on the most important news is the $8.9 billion over the next 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients who are part of the MDL group action promised to fight the settlement along with Talc claimants. Why? They think it is too little money for the more than 70,000 cancer victims. Asbestos vs talc. These lawyers argue that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or litigate individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

There is a different lawyer group that isn’t part of the top leadership in this class action. These lawyers have collectively amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. They want to settle in what many believe to be less than the victims deserve. Their argument is twofold. They argue that the settlement – about 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to make. But their second argument has more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are asking how J&J could file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and complex. But let’s try to explain it in simple terms.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to address both present and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. It thinks it can get a lower rate if there is a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to negotiate a settlement. Asbestos vs talc. Driving past 400 years of American past, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits everyone by dispersing settlements more fairly and more efficiently than trial courts which are where litigants get significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The basic tenet in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of a profitable company making an affiliate to accept the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – something Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was financially trouble due to the fact that J&J promised unlimited funding.
Then J&J jumped on the unlimited funding part of the holding and did not promise to fund unlimited litigation. J&J claims that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address concerns of the appellate court, while supplying funds for claim payments. As if offering victims less money will solve the overarching problem.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who do not agree with the agreement counter this with what you conclude is the legal argument. Asbestos vs talc. They counter with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared: victims’ lawyers call it the most significant “fraudulent move of assets in United States history.”

In spite of the legal jargon, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. But it is a way to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023, Update Bloomberg has an interesting report on a brand new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder class action lawsuit. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a percentage of any winnings. J&J is now willing the payment of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is made public because of a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funding sources outside of the. The rule aims to address the rising calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J faces over 60,000 claims when you add up federal and state infant powder litigation. Third-party funding in mass tort claims is not without its pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are witnessing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people and large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It is enjoyable to see the worm turn in this litigation. J&J was hit again this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay as J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision at the U.S. Supreme Court. The automatic stay has halted the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt company over a year ago. Asbestos vs talc. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was invalid only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it continue in the meantime of its SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay having been in effect, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the talcum powder class action MDL in over one year. Seven new talc cases were included in the MDL in the past month which brings the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation to determine how much J&J talc products have cost the government in the years.
In a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc-based products for decades while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the chemicals. The demand comes just weeks following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Asbestos vs talc. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlements to victims to in putting this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the top firms.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.