Gold Bond Cornstarch Vs Talc – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would be worth $440 million US state AGs. Gold Bond Cornstarch Vs Talc .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broad $8.9 billion deal to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc-based ingredients cause cancer. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company intends to pay different types of cancer victims as part of an arrangement for bankruptcy. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. J&J has claimed that its Talc products are safe, and will not cause cancer. It’s trying for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million to an additional trust to settle claims brought in state courts by attorneys general claiming that J&J violated state unfair business practices as well as consumer protection laws, by deceiving consumers regarding the quality of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection cases against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from moving forward in 2021. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated actions in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands according to court papers.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients as well as those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s watchdog on bankruptcy, who have argued that a successful business like J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections intended for struggling debtors.
The first attempt by LTL to resolve the bankruptcy cases was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appeals court determined that LTL wasn’t in “financial financial distress” and therefore not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. LTL filed a second bankruptcy less than two hours after the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different in that it had less money available and more backing for an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of the law enforcement powers of the state by trying to unilaterally cap the liability of the company in state consumer protection measures.

 

Gold Bond Cornstarch Vs Talc

LTL’s new filings also included additional details about how the company plans to evaluate and pay cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45 and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with cancer of the ovary prior to age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the kind and severity of the cancer, the person’s age, previous using talc and other factors. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. For instance the case of a woman who used talc products weekly, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with stage II ovarian cancer at the age of 55 may be eligible for a $21,125 payment under the settlement plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc opponents to take part in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the plan to enter into negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to handle the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. While one firm representing plaintiffs supports the deal, another group opposes the move.

Earlier this week, the opposition group, called”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to disqualify the petition by argument that LTL can not be considered in financial hardship.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a few of law firms to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan–a plan the vast majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. “The law firms that are behind these filings have interests in finance that do not align with, diverge from, and contravene those which their clientele. We’ll submit a response an appeal to the appellate court.”

Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which boasts more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J claimed that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J failed.

“J&J issues press releases about how great its plan is while simultaneously insisting that the plan’s details, including what the individual sick individuals would receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do J&J have to cover up?”

 

 

Kaplan has instructed the sides to develop a new reorganization plan, under the oversight and supervision of mediators.

The court in February of 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release the company from the thousands of lawsuits related to its talcum-based products.

But in January of this year an appeals court of the federal government overturned the decision, ruling that the company could not be considered in “financial distress.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed the same month, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether or not to accept an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.

In the 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which the cases were on hold. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The company would like claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J will require 75% of the vote in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the team of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy play in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee which is a division belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting motions to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” These doors “are not available to anyone that lack a legitimate bankruptcy goal or who seek to use the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.

To its credit, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their products containing talc, such as the famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market–first in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.

J&J wants to avoid the expense of going to trial. It has prevailed in most of the cases that have been decided during trial, however, some losses have been very severe.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker but was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine cases involving talc, which are in appeal or concluded. Out of 41 trials 32 of them ended in a win by J&J as well as mistrials or plaintiff verdict that was dismissed upon appeal. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The company also in 2020 sought to settle more than 1000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg published at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Gold Bond Cornstarch Vs Talc

Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits in every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder for Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as the Baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in certain women.

This page gives a J&J Talc Power litigation update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amounts of the cases of ovarian cancer.

Has the deadline passed for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who assume the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a no-cost, quick review of your case online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Gold Bond Cornstarch Vs Talc

June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc trial which took place in California yesterday, a few technical issues halted the opening statements of the defense attorneys. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. Jurors from their homes via Zoom but did not hear Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express skepticism about the 70s science claiming asbestos was present in their product before the opening was abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff was able to present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals with talc is expected. He testified that his team had notified J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos in the talc produced by the company, although in lower than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J made the decision to split its talc division, and then declare bankrupt marks an important point in the ongoing talc litigation controversy. Trial began yesterday in the poignant trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma last year, which both sides believe is a grave tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the stark differences in each side’s narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire on Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. As per the lawyer the company attempted to manipulate the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers found in tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance as we development of the trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its distinctive issues in comparison to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits ruling in favor of the plaintiff could inflict a serious setback to J&J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc division was able to defend its second Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the filing was distinct from the first filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J, the largest settlement ever in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. It was not mentioned how the amount of the settlement implies that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from a variety of plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than 60,000 claimants. This is not easy to confirm however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial concerning its cosmetic talc products allegedly containing asbestos is set to begin jury selection on Monday, California within the Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable jurisdiction for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products which that the company does not deny. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now fighting over who should be appointed to the position of the future claims representative, a role that is critically important to resolving the claims involving talc. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs across the country was appointed the claims representative during the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be named to the position again, but lawyers for the talc plaintiffs are objecting due to the fact that Ellis has an interest conflict which should stop her from holding that position once more. The conflict stems from the issue that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the controversially contesting second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capacity to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy will likely to get dismissed anyway.

May 17th, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J made up for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million as a settlement for allegations made by states who accuse J&J of misleading marketing for its talc-based products. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine an eventuality where J&J can push these settlements for babies given these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer may seem like a huge sum initially, it does not appear appealing when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations, would not provide victims with much more than $100,000 per instance. That is not enough.

May 15th 2023 update: J&J may be in the middle of a suit from an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The group claims J&J deliberately withdrew a $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of right to compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week next week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed from J&J subsidiary LTL Management. However, in the meantime, LTL Management has filed an order calling for both parties to participate in a new settlement negotiation with the hopes of achieving an international settlement agreement can be come to fruition.

May 5th, 2023: Update on Talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. Over 2,700 people have sued the company and it has been paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for equitable distribution of assets between the claimants of talc instead of being taken in the hands of the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of litigation.

May 4 2023 Update: U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks on settlement with lawyers who rebuffed Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps for another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the best way to settle these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can get done. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. However, it’ll require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided on whether to accept the proposal and not every client sees the issue in the same manner their lawyer views it. Second bankruptcy cases are likely to be a failure with Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide whether to discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.

May 3, 2023 Update: A group of cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested to have the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation regarding talc-related products. The group of talc claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday, asking for the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case to a lower court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The committee also requested that the stopped tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered the possibility of an $8.9 billion deal. The committee believes that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J is a reason for the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a formal response in the appeals court characterizing the filing as a “desperate and legally insufficient move” by a handful of law firms who have competing financial interests.
May 1st, 2023 Update: One common question that people ask is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s an immense amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. They are a great arguments for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently when two talc cases ended in large verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon ended in an award that was $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for hearing on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million in favor of plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the top suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: When J&J initially attempted to pull the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to set aside $2 billion for settlements. This was an absurdly low amount. There was no one among the talc victims who agreed with the offer. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a large section of the talc victims as well as their lawyers. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. But with 75% of talc plaintiffs, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans is not an easy task due to the sheer number of lawyers with massive collections of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed against the proposed settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 update: Talc Cancer victims have requested a judge to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially distressed. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that LTL was not a candidate to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial stress.

The claimants contend that the third Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system and it’s being conducted in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant backing” from the firms that represent around 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Although trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for at least 60 calendar days however, new lawsuits may be filed, and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its plan with a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13th, 2023 Update: major story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients in MDL class action MDL collective action promised to fight the settlement alongside Talc claimants. Why? They think it is not enough money for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. The lawyers say that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or litigate individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

There is a different set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership in the class action. They have amassed the equivalent of tens of thousands of lawsuits. The group is seeking to settle the case now for what is believed to be far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument is twofold. The first is that they claim the settlement of around 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to make. But their second argument has more force: the victims can no longer wait and want to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are wondering if J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and convoluted. Let’s try to clarify it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to deal with both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. It thinks it will pay less should there be an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure for a settlement. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. Driving past hundreds of years of American history, the company argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties because it distributes settlement payments more equitably and efficiently than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant settlements while others get nothing.

The basic tenet of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – the profit-making company that has a subsidiary to take the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – something Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated that the entity was financially trouble due to the fact that J&J promises unlimited funding.
Then J&J decided to go with the unlimited funding aspect of the holding and did not promise to provide unlimited funding for litigation. The company claims that updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the concerns of the appeals court while supplying funds for claim payments. In the hope that offering victims lesser money could solve the overarching problem.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who oppose the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier decision. The hyperbole wasn’t spared attorneys representing the victims claim it the largest “fraudulent transfer ever in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. However, it’s a means of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update: Bloomberg offers an informative article on a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the plaintiffs in the class action. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged in exchange for a portion of wins. J&J is now willing to pay $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is public information because of an New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funding sources outside of the. The law is designed to tackle the growing demands for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you take into account federal and state baby powder lawsuits. Third-party funding of mass tort cases is not without its pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are witnessing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individual as well as large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s interesting to watch the worm turning in this case. J&J was hit again this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place in the meantime that J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy to the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay stopped thousands of talcum cases and stopped any the filing of new lawsuits ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin talc-related liabilities into a bankrupt subsidiary more than a year in the past. Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J was hoping to have it continued pending its SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16th, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the Talcum Powder class action MDL in just over a year. Seven new talc lawsuits were brought into the MDL in the past month and brought the total number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into how much J&J product containing talc has cost the government in the many years.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc-based products for years while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the product. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlement proposals for victims in order in putting this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the top companies.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At a hearing today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Gold bond cornstarch vs talc. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • Gold Bond Medicated Baby Powder Talc – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Can I View Divorce Records Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Check Divorce Status Online Ny – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Get A Copy Of A Marriage License And Divorce Decree In Florida Free No Scams – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Lagos High Court Divorce Certificate Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • How To Find Divorce Documents Online Montgomery County Pa – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Jackson County Divorce Lawyer Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Apply Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Is It Better To File For Retirement Disability Benefits Beforeor After Divorce, Florida – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Johnson And Johnson Lawsuit 2015 – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  •  

  • Disclosure
  • Finding A Good Divorce Lawyer
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  •  

    >>> Gold Bond Cornstarch Vs Talc

    You May Also Like