You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is modern talc dangerous. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would make payments of $440 million US state AGs. Is Modern Talc Dangerous .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc-based product causes cancer. Is modern talc dangerous.

J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company plans to pay different kinds of cancer victims as part of the bankruptcy settlement. Is modern talc dangerous. J&J has stated that its Talc products are safe, and won’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims made by state attorneys general claiming that J&J had violated the state’s unfair commercial practices and consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers regarding the safety of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from proceeding in 2021. Is modern talc dangerous. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed suit for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas in LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL, joining cancer victims and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have claimed that a lucrative business like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at the struggling debtors.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed following similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court determined that LTL wasn’t in “financial difficulty” and thus not eligible under bankruptcy law. Is modern talc dangerous. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again within two hours of the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different due to the fact that it had less money and had more support for the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the state’s law enforcement authority by attempting unilaterally to cap the liability of the company in state consumer protection measures.

Is Modern Talc Dangerous

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more information on how the company would evaluate and pay cancer claims when the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The highest payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before the age of 45, and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

The proposed settlement offers discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, the individual’s years of age, their history of usage of talc and other variables. Is modern talc dangerous. For example the case of a woman who used daily talc products, had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer and was diagnosed an ovarian cancer stage II at the age of 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payment according to the plan.

Judge orders J&J and talc oppositionists to participate in settlement talks.

Following another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to manage the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Is modern talc dangerous. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs is in favor of the offer, another group is against the settlement.

The previous week, the opposition group, which is known as”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition by asserting that LTL can not be considered in financial hardship.

“The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a handful of law firms to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan – a plan the vast majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Is modern talc dangerous. “The law firms involved in the filing are pursuing financial interests which clash with, contradict and oppose the interests they represent. We will be submitting an answer in the appeals court.”

Is modern talc dangerous. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that has more than 80 mesothelioma victims who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort will fail.

“J&J sends out press releases about how wonderful its plan is, while insisting that the plan’s details, including what each sick person will be treated to,” Thompson said in the statement. “What is J&J’s plan to keep secret?”

Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new arrangement plan under the supervision from two mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve J&J from the tens of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.

In January of this year, a federal appeals court overturned the ruling, ruling that the firm could not be considered in “financial distress.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was denied on April 1, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy roughly two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to grant an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases have been in limbo. Is modern talc dangerous. J&J wants the claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J would need 75% support for the deal to go through.

In addition to the group of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy, the U.S. Trustee, a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file an appeal to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy courts are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” These doors “are not open to any parties that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no conclusive evidence that its talc products, including its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products from the market and will first launch them in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the cost of going to court. It has won most of the cases decided through trial, though some losses have been severe.
A well-known trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are being appealed or concluded. Of the 41 trials, 32 have ended in the favor of J&J, a mistrial or verdict of a plaintiff dismissed in appeal. Is modern talc dangerous. Additionally, the company has announced plans to settle more than 1,000 cases worth 100 million dollars, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Modern Talc Dangerous

Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits across every state. The talcum powder lawsuits on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. Is modern talc dangerous. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as Shower to Shower Powder as well as Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause ovarian cancer in certain women.

This page offers the J&J Talc Power Update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Is the deadline for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many people who think the time limit has expired to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a no-cost and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Modern Talc Dangerous

June 2, 2023 Update: During the trial for asbestos-containing talc in California yesterday, a few technical issues interrupted the opening statements made by defense attorneys. Is modern talc dangerous. Jurors from home on Zoom but did not hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the 70s research affirming the presence of asbestos in their product, but the session abruptly ended.

In the meantime, the plaintiff could present the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals alongside talc is expected. He said that his team informed J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc produced by the company, although with less than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Is modern talc dangerous. A trial for the first time since J&J decided to spin off its talc division and declare bankruptcy marks an important turning point within the ongoing litigation saga. The trial started yesterday in the tragic case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma earlier this year. a diagnosis lawyers on both sides acknowledge is a tragic loss.

The opening statements exposed the stark differences in each side’s story. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, the company tried to manipulate asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents dating back to 1978 and 1994 showing that asbestos fibers in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its unique challenges compared to most talcum powder lawsuits ruling in favor of the plaintiff could inflict the company with a major setback in its hopes of broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc division strongly defended the two-time Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from talc injury claimants. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the case was distinct from the prior filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J as the largest settlement ever made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Is modern talc dangerous. Not mentioned: how the amount of the settlement indicates that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over sixty thousand claimants. It is difficult to confirm but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial on its cosmetic talc items allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to begin jury selection on Monday in California within the Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known place for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure through J&J’s products and the company denies. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are fighting over who should be chosen to fill the role of a the future claims representative, the role is crucially essential in resolving the Talc claims. Is modern talc dangerous. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs throughout the country, was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to that role yet again, but the lawyers for the talc plaintiffs are objecting because Ellis has a conflict of interest which should stop her from holding that position in the future. The dispute stems from possibility that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the controversially contested second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her capacity to be neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy will likely to be tossed out anyway.

May 17th, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J formed for the talc bankruptcy has informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million as a settlement for claims brought by states accusing the company of misleading advertising for its talc product. Is modern talc dangerous. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It is hard to imagine a scenario where J&J can push these baby powder settlements through in these figures. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer seems like a large sum initially, it will not appear appealing after you calculate the figures. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations – would not pay victims much more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. That is not enough.

May 15 2023 Update: J&J could be facing lawsuit from an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Is modern talc dangerous. The group argues that J&J intentionally withdrew a $61.5 billion contract for funding with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of right to compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week this week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy application that was filed by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime, however, this bankruptcy court has issued an Order which requires both sides to participate in a second settlement mediation to see if a global settlement deal can come to fruition.

May 5, 2023 Update: The talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Is modern talc dangerous. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the company and it is spending $1 million a month for legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million verdict in South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for an equitable distribution of assets to talc claimants, rather than being seized from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have declared bankruptcy because of legal proceedings.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart talks on settlement with lawyers who rebuffed Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps to take in their second bankruptcy matter. Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. A settlement for baby powder can be completed. Is modern talc dangerous. But it will require more money – billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not every client sees the issue in the same manner their lawyer sees it. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to fail the judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to determine whether to dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3 2023 Update The group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) demanded that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation over talc products. The group representing claimants for talc made a motion Tuesday asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back to a lower court with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Is modern talc dangerous. They also asked that stopped tort litigation against J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered the possibility of an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee says that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J is a reason for an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a formal response to the appeals court saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally insufficient effort” by a few of law firms with different financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s an enormous amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. Is modern talc dangerous. And these are really good case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently when two talc cases ended in large verdicts for plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon led to a verdict of $18.1 million. In the same month, a different mesothelioma-related talc case went to trials in South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million for the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the leading suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th, 2023 Update: When J&J initially attempted to pull the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it came with an offer to reserve $2 billion for settlements. The amount was absurdly low. All of the talc plaintiffs supported the proposal. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Is modern talc dangerous. However, 75% of talc plaintiffs, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan is not an easy task due to the sheer number of lawyers with vast inventory of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update: Talc cancer claimants have sought a court order to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially distressed. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Is modern talc dangerous. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief since it had not demonstrated financial difficulties.

The plaintiffs argue that the third Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system, and that it is being pursued in bad good faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from firms representing around 60,000 claimants. It’s fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over this $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Although trials for the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for at least 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Is modern talc dangerous. The judge expressed his doubts about J&J’s absurd attempt to revive its strategy with the second bankruptcy case.

April 13, 2023 Update: big news is the $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims involved in the MDL collective action pledged to fight the settlement along with the talc claimants. Why? They think it is not enough to pay for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Is modern talc dangerous. They argue that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or even litigate individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is thrown out.

But there’s a separate lawyer group that isn’t part of the leadership of this class action. These lawyers have amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. They want to settle for what is believed to be lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument is twofold. First, they argue the settlement – which amounts to an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to make. However, their second argument has more force: victims should no longer wait and want to get their money right now.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are looking for ways J&J can go through bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and convoluted. But let’s try to explain the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to deal with both present and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. In other words, it thinks it will pay less in the event of the bankruptcy element which applies pressure to settle. Is modern talc dangerous. Driving past 400 years of American history, the firm believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties because it distributes settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts, where some litigants receive significant settlements while others get nothing.

The main thrust of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of an enterprise that is profitable, forming an entity to assume the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated that the entity was in financial crisis due to the fact that J&J promised unlimited funding.
Then J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding part of the deal and didn’t promise that it would provide unlimited funds for cases. The company says that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. As if offering victims lesser money could solve the problem at hand.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who do not agree with the agreement counter this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared attorneys representing the victims claim it the largest “fraudulent transaction in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. However, it’s a means of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update: Bloomberg has an interesting article about a new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a percentage of any wins. J&J has now offered the payment of $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public knowledge due to an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funding sources outside of the. The rules aim to respond to the increasing calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you add up state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits has both pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are witnessing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individual and big companies in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turn in this case. J&J was hit again this week when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have stopped the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped any new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J initiated the controversial effort to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt entity over a year earlier. Is modern talc dangerous. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid a few months ago, the stay was removed. J&J was hoping to have it continue in the meantime of an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the very first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL within a year. Seven new talc lawsuits have been added to the MDL in the last month increasing the number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into the amount J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the decades.
In a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc product for years while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the products. The suit comes just a few days after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Is modern talc dangerous. J&J needs to start making fair settlement offers to victims to getting this behind. It’s a mark on one of the top businesses.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.