You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc bad. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would pay 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Is Talc Bad .
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that it’s Baby Powder as well as other talc product causes cancer. Is talc bad.
J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company intends to pay for different types of cancer sufferers in the bankruptcy settlement. Is talc bad. J&J has said that its Talc products are safe, and won’t cause cancer. It’s trying for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed in state courts by attorneys general claiming that J&J had violated states’ unfair practices and consumer protection laws through misleading consumers regarding the quality of its talc products.
Some states had started consumer protection measures against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from moving forward in 2021. Is talc bad. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought actions with Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas according to court papers.
New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. have claimed that a lucrative business like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for people with debt problems.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed following similar arguments. The U.S. appeals court decided it was not LTL wasn’t in “financial distress” and thus not eligible for bankruptcy protection. Is talc bad. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again less than two hours after the dismissal, arguing its second attempt was different in that it had less money available and had more support for the settlement.
New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of state law enforcement authorities by attempting unilaterally to cap the liability of the company in state consumer protection laws.
Is Talc Bad
The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include additional details about how the company would evaluate and pay claims for cancer should the bankruptcy plan be approved.
The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.
From there, the proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the kind and severity of cancer, an individual’s years of age, their history of usage of talc and other variables. Is talc bad. For instance the case of a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary at the age of 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payout under the settlement plan.
Judge orders J&J and talc oppositionists to engage in settlement talks.
Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the move to conduct talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.
The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to settle claims – the company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Is talc bad. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the offer, another group is against the settlement.
Earlier this week, the opposition group, dubbed”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition asserting that LTL cannot be regarded as financially distressed.
“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a small number of law firms to try to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan – a plan the vast majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Is talc bad. “The law firms involved in this filing have financial interests that conflict with, differ from and contravene those which their clientele. We’ll submit a response in the appeals court.”
Is talc bad. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which is home to more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J claimed that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J will fail.
“J&J issue press releases describing how fantastic its plan is, while demanding that plan details–including what the individual sick individuals would receive,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What do they have to hide?”
Kaplan has commanded the parties to develop a new strategy for reorganization, under the oversight by two mediators.
The court in February of 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release the company from the hundreds of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.
But in the month of January, a federal appeals court overturned the verdict, ruling that the company could not be considered to be in “financial distress.”
In the event that J&J’s request to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was denied at the end of April J&J applied for its first bankruptcy two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether or not to approve another bankruptcy.
J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B talc litigation charge.
With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases were put held. Is talc bad. The company would like claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J requires 75% acceptance for the deal to pass.
Alongside the group of talc lawyers that criticized the company’s bankruptcy and the U.S. Trustee, an arm belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting motions to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.
In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not open to parties that lack a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to use bankruptcy to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.
To its credit, J&J maintains there is no conclusive evidence that its products containing talc, such as its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market–first on North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.
J&J wants to avoid the expense of going to trial. J&J has won the majority of cases decided during trial, however, certain losses have been punitive.
A well-known trial in Missouri led to a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker but was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.
Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are on appeal or have been settled. In 41 trials 32 have ended in winning for J&J or a mistrial, or plaintiff verdict that was reversed in appeal. Is talc bad. The company also has announced plans to settle more than 1000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg reported at the time.
Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Talc Bad
Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits across all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Is talc bad. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer among some women.
This page gives the J&J update on the talc power litigation and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amount in these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.
Has the deadline passed for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who assume the statute of limitations has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a no-cost, quick review of your case online.
Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Talc Bad
June 2 2023 Update: During the trial for asbestos-containing talc which took place in California yesterday, technical issues halted the opening statements of the defense lawyers. Is talc bad. Jurors at home via Zoom, did hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubts about the 70s research claiming asbestos was present in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.
The plaintiff had the opportunity to introduce the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of other minerals with talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group was notified by J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc manufactured by the company, though at lower than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.
June 1, 2023 Update: Is talc bad. The first trial since J&J decided to spin off its Talc division and declare bankruptcy is an important turning point in the ongoing talc litigation drama. The trial started yesterday in the heartbreaking trial of a young plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year, which both sides of the argument agree is a tragedy of a different kind.
Opening statements laid bare stark differences in each side’s story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to, the company attempted to manipulate asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.
Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance as we course of this trial. Despite the unique nature of the mesothelioma trial and its distinct issues compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could be an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.
May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit vigorously defended it’s second Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from victims of talc injuries. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the situation was vastly different from the earlier filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J which is the largest settlement ever in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Is talc bad. The issue is not discussed: whether the amount of the settlement implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than 600,00 claimants. It is difficult to confirm but likely incorrect.
May 24, 2023 Update: Since Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the very first trial involving its cosmetic talc products allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to commence jury selection on Monday, California with Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation J&J denies. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.
May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the second J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently battling over who should be chosen to fill the role of a future claims representative. This is the role is crucially important to resolving the claim for talc. Is talc bad. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be named to the position yet again, but the lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing due to the fact that Ellis has an interest conflict which should stop her from holding that position in the future. The conflict stems from the reality that Ellis was involved in drafting the hotly contesting second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her capacity to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy could be dismissed regardless.
May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company J&J put together for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to settle the claims of states that accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc product. Is talc bad. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer patients. It’s difficult to envision a scenario where J&J can push the settlements of baby powder through given these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot initially, it may not appear appealing when you do the math. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations, would not offer victims anything more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.
May 15, 2023 Update: J&J may be in the middle of a lawsuit by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. Is talc bad. The group contends that J&J intentionally canceled an $61.5 billion funding agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision amounts to a fraudulent transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.
May 10 2023 Update: The following week this week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy application from J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime the bankruptcy has issued an order that requires both parties to take part in a settlement mediation in the hope that the global settlement can be brokered.
May 5th 2023 Update: The talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Is talc bad. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the firm and it has been paying $1 million per month for legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million verdict at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for a fair distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being taken from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to lawsuits.
May 4, 2023 Update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart negotiations with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s $8.9 billion deal. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss the next steps in this second case of bankruptcy. Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.
This is the solution to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be achieved. Is talc bad. But it’ll need additional money – perhaps billions of dollars – by Johnson & Johnson.
Lawyers have a split opinion on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not all clients see the issue the same way their attorney does. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to fail and Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide if he will remove the bankruptcy after the second.
May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested for J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation over talc products. The committee representing talc claimants has filed a motion this week requesting the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back an earlier court with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Is talc bad. They also asked that lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J continue to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee argues that the recent decision allowing LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J and J&J, requires immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a response to the appeals court declaring the filing a “desperate and legally inadequate effort” by a select group of law firms that have competing financial interests.
May 1st, 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their attorneys turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s a lot of money. There are a lot of victims. Is talc bad. They are a great claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently in two talc trials which ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon led to the verdict in the amount of $18.1 million. The following month, a second talc mesothelioma case went to the court in South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the top manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. The amount was absurdly low. None of the talc plaintiffs supported the proposal. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they also have the support of a substantial section of the talc victims and their attorneys. Is talc bad. However, 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans It’s a long and difficult process with so many lawyers with huge inventory of baby powder litigations opposed in favor of the deal.
What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023, Update Talc Cancer victims have requested a judge to dismiss the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially strained. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Is talc bad. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief since it failed to show financial stress.
The claimants contend that the third Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being conducted in bad faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from the firms that represent an estimated 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s safe to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over the $8.9 billion deal.
April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. While trials in Talc lawsuits are suspended for a minimum of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Is talc bad. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s absurd attempt to revive its plan with a second bankruptcy trial.
April 13th, 2023 update: the most important story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 year period settlement offered. Lawyers representing cancer victims in MDL class action MDL class action have pledged to fight the settlement along with Talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s too little money for the 70 000 cancer patients. Is talc bad. These lawyers argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or settle individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.
There is a different set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership of that class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated the equivalent of tens of thousands of lawsuits. The group is seeking to settle the case now in what many believe to be lower than what the victims should be paid. The argument they make is twofold. First, they argue the settlement – which amounts to the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.
This argument isn’t easy to present. However, their second argument has more force: the victims can no longer wait and want their money today.
April 12 2023 Update: Some people are looking for ways J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and complex. Let’s try to simplify it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to address both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. Also, it believes that it will be less expensive if there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to settle. Is talc bad. Going back to more than 400 years in American history, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties because it distributes settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts where litigants are awarded significant award while others do not.
The main thrust in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of a profitable company making subsidiaries to meet the legal risk and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated the company was in financial distress due to the fact that J&J promised unlimited funding.
Then J&J took advantage of the funding unlimited part of the deal and did not promise that it would provide unlimited funds for litigation. The company says that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the underlying issue.
Lawyers representing cancer victims who oppose the deal counter this argument by saying that it is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier decision. The hyperbole wasn’t spared the lawyers representing victims call it the most significant “fraudulent deal ever in United States history.”
In spite of the legal jargon, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. But it is a way of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.
April 10, 2023 Update Bloomberg provides an insightful article about a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a portion of any wins. J&J is now willing that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.
The involvement of funders is public information because of a New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about funders outside the state. This rule is intended to address the rising calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you include state and federal baby powder lawsuits. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has both pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are witnessing how third-party funding can level the playing field for individuals as well as large corporations in court.
April 4, 2023 Update: It’s interesting to watch the worm turn in this case. J&J was hit again this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay as J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision in the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J initiated the controversial effort to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt subsidiary over a year in the past. Is talc bad. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient only a few months back, the stay was lifted. J&J was hoping to have it remain in effect until hearing the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that of the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay now in effect, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the Talcum Powder class action MDL within a year. Seven new talc cases were brought into the MDL in the past month increasing the number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.
February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation into the cost J&J product containing talc has cost the government over the decades.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc-based products for many years, while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the product. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
Is talc bad. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlement proposals to victims to to put all of this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the world’s greatest firms.
February 14 , 2023 Update: At a hearing today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc bad. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
>>> Is Talc Bad
