You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc in my makeup dangerous. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
J&J’s proposed talc settlement will be worth the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Is Talc In My Makeup Dangerous .
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to address U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion deal to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc product causes cancer. Is talc in my makeup dangerous.
J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm plans to pay different kinds of cancer victims in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe, and will not cause cancer. It’s trying for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from arising in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million into a separate trust for claims filed by state attorneys general alleging that J&J did not comply with laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York and consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers regarding the quality of its talc products.
Several states had begun consumer protection cases against J&J prior to the first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from proceeding in 2021. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed suit against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative requests or subpoenas in LTL’s court filings.
New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims as well as The U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a profitable company like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections aimed at the struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments. The U.S. appeals court determined that LTL wasn’t in “financial trouble” and ineligible for bankruptcy protection. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again just over two hours after the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different in that it had less money available and had a greater chance of securing the settlement.
New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of state law enforcement powers in attempting to unilaterally limit the company’s liability for state consumer protection measures.
Is Talc In My Makeup Dangerous
The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more information on how the company would assess and pay for cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.
The highest payments under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45, and $260,000 for those diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.
The proposed settlement offers discounts based on the severity and type of cancer, the patient’s age, the history of usage of talc and other variables. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. For instance the case of a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer, and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary at the age of 55 may be eligible for a $21,125 payout under the plan.
Judge orders J&J and talc opponents discuss settlement negotiations.
Following another hearing in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.
With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to settle claims – the company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. While one firm representing plaintiffs supports the settlement, a different group is opposed to the offer.
Earlier this week, the opposition group, called”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition by asserting that LTL cannot be regarded as to be in financial trouble.
“The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a handful of law firms to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution plan–a plan that the overwhelming majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. “The law firms behind these filings have interests in finance that are in conflict with, diverge from and are in opposition to the interests of their clients. We’ll soon submit a response to the appellate court.”
Is talc in my makeup dangerous. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which boasts more than mesothelioma patients who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort failed.
“J&J publishes press release about how wonderful its plans are, but is demanding that plan details–including what the individual sick individuals would be treated to,” Thompson said in an email. “What does the company have to keep secret?”
Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new arrangement plan under the oversight by two mediators.
As of February 2022 Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would relieve the company from the hundreds of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.
However, in January of this year a federal appeals court overturned the decision, ruling that the company could not be considered to be in “financial difficulty.”
When J&J’s attempt to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed in April, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy just two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether or not to approve another bankruptcy.
J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B talc litigation charge.
In the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which the cases were suspended. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. The company is requesting that claimants vote on accepting their settlement. J&J needs 75% acceptance in order for the agreement to be accepted.
Alongside the group of talc lawyers who panned the bankruptcy of the company in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee, a branch that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.
In a statement this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not available to anyone that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.
To its credit, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its Talc-based products, such as its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market, first to be available in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.
J&J intends to steer clear of the costly business of going to court. The company has won the majority of the cases that have been resolved during trial, however, certain losses have been extremely punitive.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.
Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine talc trials that are either appealing or concluded. Of the 41 trials, 32 have resulted in a win by J&J or a mistrial, or plaintiff verdicts that were annulled in appeal. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. In addition, J&J in 2020 sought to settle over 1000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg stated at the time.
Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Talc In My Makeup Dangerous
Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits across every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as baby Powder or Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer among some women.
This page gives an J&J Talc Power litigation update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amount of the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.
Is the deadline for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who believe the deadline has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or get a no-cost, quick review of your case online.
Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Talc In My Makeup Dangerous
June 2 2023 Update: During the trial for asbestos-containing talc at the trial in California yesterday, some technical issues disrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. The jurors, attending from their homes via Zoom and hearing the Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing doubts about the 70s research that claimed asbestos was present in their product, but the proceedings abruptly ended.
The plaintiff could present the first of their witnesses, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the occurrence of additional minerals along with the talc’s mineral content is inevitable. He claimed that his group advised J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc manufactured by the company, though with just 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.
June 1st, 2023 Update: Is talc in my makeup dangerous. The first trial since J&J has decided to separate its talc division, and then declare bankrupt marks an important turning point in the ongoing talc litigation drama. The trial began on Tuesday in the harrowing case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive type of mesothelioma last year. a diagnosis lawyers on both sides believe is a tragedy of a different kind.
The opening statements exposed the sharp differences in the two sides’ story. The attorney representing the plaintiff took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to, the company attempted to manipulate asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents dating back to between 1978 and 1994 that showed asbestos fibers found in tissues of the plaintiff are part of.
Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its distinctive issues in comparison to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could cause a serious setback to J&J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.
May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has was able to defend its 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the filing was vastly different from the earlier filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment to $8.9 billion by J&J as the biggest settlement ever to be made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. There was no mention of how the magnitude of the settlement means it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from numerous plaintiffs’ law companies representing over 60,000 claimants. This is hard to verify but it’s likely to be false.
May 24, 2023 Update: Since Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the first trial concerning the cosmetic talc products it claims to containing asbestos is set to start jury selection Monday, May 24, California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good jurisdiction for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure in J&J’s product, an allegation J&J does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.
May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are battling over who should be chosen to fill the role of a the future claims representative, an important role critical to resolving talc claims. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs across the country, was appointed as the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to that role in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are protesting due to the fact that Ellis has conflicts of interest that should prevent her from being appointed to that post again. The issue stems from the issue that Ellis was reportedly involved in the drafting of the highly litigated second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her capacity to be neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy will likely to be dismissed regardless.
May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J made up for the talc bankruptcy disclosed to the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing the company of deceitful advertising for its talc products. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where J&J can push these settlements for babies at these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a huge sum initially, it will not look very appealing when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our estimates – will not be able to pay victims more than a median settlement of $100,000 per instance. That is not enough.
May 15 2023 Update J&J may be in the middle of a lawsuit by an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. The group contends that J&J intentionally withdrew the $61.5 billion funding agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action is a fraud transfer of right to compensation for victims. They are planning to study J&J’s actions in the wake of the denial of the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.
May 10 2023 Update: The following week next week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy application from J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime, LTL Management has filed an order that requires both parties to participate in a new settlement mediation in the hope that a global settlement deal can reached.
May 5th 2023 Update: Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the company and the company was spending $1 million a month to defend its legal position. The company’s recent $29 million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner between the claimants of talc instead of being taken through the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of legal proceedings.
May 4 2023, Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart talks on settlement with lawyers who rejected the company’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared before a judge to discuss next steps to take in the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.
This is the way to settle these claims for J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be made. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. But it will require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars – by Johnson & Johnson.
Lawyers have a split opinion on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not all clients view the issue the same way their lawyer views it. A second bankruptcy proceeding is destined to be a failure as Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide if he will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.
May 3, 2023 Update A group of cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked an order from the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group representing claimants for talc made a motion Tuesday requesting the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back an earlier court with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. The committee also requested that the lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered a $8.9 billion deal. The committee believes that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J and J&J, requires immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J plans to file a response in the appeals court characterizing the filing as a “desperate and legally deficient attempt” by a few of law firms who have conflicts of financial interests.
May 1st, 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how plaintiffs and their lawyers turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s quite a sum. But there are plenty of victims. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. And these are really good case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week in two talc trials which resulted in big verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon led to the verdict that was $18.1 million. A month later, another talc mesothelioma case went to the court on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the most prominent producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. It was a ridiculously small amount. The talc plaintiffs had not supported the offer. This time around, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims accept a bankruptcy settlement and they have the backing of a significant portion of the talc plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. However, 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans is a difficult road with so many lawyers with huge collections of baby powder lawsuits opposed towards the agreement.
What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 update: Talc patients have demanded a judge dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly-made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, saying the company is not financially distressed. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying LTL was not eligible for bankruptcy relief as it failed to show financial stress.
The plaintiffs argue that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system, and that the case is being handled in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant backing” from the firms that represent about 60,000 potential plaintiffs. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and the victims are split over what they believe is an $8.9 billion offer for settlement.
April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has decided the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Even though trials for talc lawsuits are paused for a minimum of 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. The judge expressed his doubts about J&J’s absurd attempt to relaunch its strategy in another bankruptcy case.
April 13th, 2023: Update on the biggest announcement is an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims within MDL class action MDL group action pledged to fight the settlement alongside talc claimants. Why? They think it is too little money for the those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. These lawyers argue that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or litigate individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is dismissed.
However, there is a second group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership in the class action. These lawyers have collectively amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle the case now with what they believe is less than these victims deserve. The argument they make is twofold. First, they argue that the settlement – which amounts to an average of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.
It’s a difficult argument to argue. The second argument is more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand the money immediately.
April 12 2023 Update: People are asking how J&J could file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and complex. But let’s try to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to settle both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. That is, it believes it can pay less should there be a bankruptcy component that applies pressure for a settlement. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. Moving past hundreds of years of American history, the company claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties because it distributes settlements more fairly and effectively than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.
The basic tenet of the 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves a profitable company making a subsidiary to take the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – something Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the subsidiary was not financially difficulty because J&J promised unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding aspect of the agreement and did not promise to offer unlimited funding for the litigation. J&J claims that its revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary address concerns of the appellate court, while supplying funds for claim payments. As if offering victims less money will solve the underlying issue.
Lawyers representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter this argument by saying that it is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the largest “fraudulent transfer of assets in United States history.”
Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. However, it’s a means to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement to keep pressure on plaintiffs.
April 10 2023, Update Bloomberg offers an informative piece on a law that has been passed of New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the plaintiffs in the class action. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a portion of any profits. J&J has now offered the payment of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.
The involvement of funders is public knowledge due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rule aims to address the rising calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you add up state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding of mass tort cases has both pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people and big companies in the courtroom.
April 4, 2023 Update: It is interesting to watch the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J suffered another setback this week, when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place in the meantime that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have froze thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liability into a bankrupt subsidiary over a year earlier. Is talc in my makeup dangerous. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal just a few months ago the stay was revoked. J&J was hoping to have it remain in effect until the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that for the Supreme Court is willing even to accept the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the Talcum Powder class action MDL within a year. Seven new talc cases were added to the MDL during the month of March which brings the total number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.
February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation to determine how much J&J products containing talc have cost the government in the decades.
in a letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc product for decades while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the product. The suit comes just a few days following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
Is talc in my makeup dangerous. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlements for victims in order getting this behind. It is a stain on one of the world’s greatest companies.
February 14 2023 Update: During an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc in my makeup dangerous. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!