You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc in supplements bad for you. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would provide 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Is Talc In Supplements Bad For You .
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to address U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broad $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc-based products cause cancer. Is talc in supplements bad for you.
J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm will pay various types of cancer patients in a bankruptcy settlement. Is talc in supplements bad for you. J&J has declared that its talc products are safe and do not cause cancer. J&J is seeking the second time to end more than 38,000 lawsuits brought in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle claims filed in state courts by attorneys general alleging that J&J had violated the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws through misleading consumers regarding the dangers of its talc products.
Many states had initiated consumer protection measures against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from progressing in 2021. Is talc in supplements bad for you. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched actions for damages against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas, according to LTL’s court papers.
New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients as well as The U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a successful firm like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for people with debt problems.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy cases was dismissed after similar arguments. A U.S. appeals court decided it was not LTL had not been in “financial distress” and therefore not eligible for bankruptcy protection. Is talc in supplements bad for you. LTL made a new bankruptcy application less than two hours after the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different due to the fact that it had less money available and had more support for the possibility of settling.
New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s new bankruptcy violates state law enforcement powers by trying to unilaterally cap the liability of the company in state consumer protection measures.
Is Talc In Supplements Bad For You
LTL’s new filings also included more details on the way in which the company will evaluate and settle cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.
The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 to those diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45 and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.
The proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, the individual’s age, the history of the use of talc, and other aspects. Is talc in supplements bad for you. For example the case of a woman who used the talc product on a regular basis, had a family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed an ovarian cancer stage II at age 55 may qualify for a $21,125 payment according to the plan.
Judge gives order to J&J, talc opponents to engage in settlement talks.
After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the strategy to engage in settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.
In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to manage the claims company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Is talc in supplements bad for you. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the deal, another group opposes the move.
Earlier this week, the opposition group, called”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to dismiss this case argument that LTL cannot be regarded as financially distressed.
“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a small number of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution plan–a plan that the overwhelming majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Is talc in supplements bad for you. “The law firms who filed their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that do not align with, diverge from and infringe on the rights which their clientele. We’ll submit an appeal in the appeals court.”
Is talc in supplements bad for you. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which includes more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy attempt is likely to fail.
“J&J issues press releases about how great the plan is but simultaneously requesting that details of the plan, such as what individuals with illnesses would receive,” Thompson said in an email. “What do they have to keep secret?”
Kaplan has instructed both sides to devise a second strategy for reorganization, under supervision of two mediators.
In February 2022, Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free J&J from the hundreds of thousands of claims over its talcum products.
However, in January of this year a federal appeals court overturned the verdict, ruling that the business could not be considered to be in “financial distress.”
After J&J’s challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was denied in April, J&J filed for its second bankruptcy about two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to allow an additional bankruptcy.
J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.
In the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases were placed held. Is talc in supplements bad for you. The company is requesting that claimants vote on accepting their settlement. J&J will require 75% support in order for the agreement to be accepted.
In addition to the team of talc lawyers who criticised the company’s bankruptcy in the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee, a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting an application to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.
In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not available to anyone that lack a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.
On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their Talc-based products, such as its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market first to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world later this year.
J&J wants to avoid the costly business of going to court. It has prevailed in most of the cases that have been resolved through trial, though some losses have been severe.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri ended in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.
Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are in appeal or settled. In 41 trials 32 have ended in the favor of J&J as well as mistrials or plaintiff verdicts that were annulled on appeal. Is talc in supplements bad for you. Separately, the company in 2020 moved to settle more than 1,000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg published at the time.
Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Talc In Supplements Bad For You
Our lawyers handle the baby powder litigation in every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. Is talc in supplements bad for you. The lawsuits claim that the long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as the Baby Powder and Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause ovarian cancer in certain women.
This page gives an J&J Talc Power litigation update and provides an overview of how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts of the ovarian cancer lawsuits.
Is the deadline for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many people who think the time limit has expired to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a free and quick case review online.
Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Talc In Supplements Bad For You
June 2 2023 Update: During the trial for asbestos-containing talc at the trial in California yesterday, technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense lawyers. Is talc in supplements bad for you. The jurors, attending at home via Zoom and hearing the Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the 70s research that claimed asbestos was present in their product prior to the trial was abruptly closed.
The plaintiff had the opportunity to introduce its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of additional minerals along with talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group had notified J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc manufactured by the company, though in just 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.
June 1st, 2023 Update: Is talc in supplements bad for you. The first trial since J&J took the decision to disband its talc section and declaring bankruptcy is an important moment within the ongoing lawsuit controversy. The trial began on Tuesday in the tragic case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year, which both sides believe is a tragic loss.
Opening statements revealed the huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson tried to alter asbestos’ definition, in spite of internal documents dating from 1998 and 1994 that show asbestos fibers in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.
Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance as we course of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma-related case and the unique issues it faces compared to the majority of talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could cause an enormous setback for J&J’s expectations of widespread acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.
May 31, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc business strongly defended it’s 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the face of challenges from injured talc claimants. In a written objection to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, it argued that the filing was distinct from the earlier filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment of $8.9 billion by J&J which is the largest settlement ever in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Is talc in supplements bad for you. There was no mention of how the size of the settlement signifies that it’s an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed support from numerous plaintiffs’ law companies representing over 60,000 claimants. This is hard to verify but is probably incorrect.
May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial regarding the cosmetic talc products it claims to that contain asbestos is scheduled to start jury selection on Monday, May 24, California in Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known place for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation J&J denies. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.
May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently disputing who should be appointed to the role of a the claims representative in the future, a role that is critically important to resolving the claims involving talc. Is talc in supplements bad for you. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs all over the nation, was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to this position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs are objecting because Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest which would prohibit her from assuming that position again. The dispute stems from reality that Ellis was apparently involved in the creation of the hotly disputable second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capacity to be neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy could be dismissed regardless.
May 17, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J put together for the talc bankruptcy told a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million as a settlement for claims of states that accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc-based products. Is talc in supplements bad for you. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It is hard to imagine an eventuality where J&J can push these baby powder settlements through with these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer seems like a lot initially, it may not look good when you do the math. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations would not be able to pay victims more than $100,000 per instance. That’s not enough.
May 15 2023 Update: J&J may be in the middle of a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Is talc in supplements bad for you. The group claims that J&J intentionally withdrew a $61.5 billion contract for funding together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision is a fraud transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They plan to explore J&J’s actions following of the denial of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.
May 10 2023 Update: Next week this week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed that was filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management. In the meantime, this bankruptcy court has issued an order calling for both parties to participate in a settlement mediation to see if it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement reached.
May 5th, 2023: Update on Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Is talc in supplements bad for you. Over 2,700 people have sued the firm, and it was paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million settlement on the state of South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing for equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being taken in the hands of the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of legal proceedings.
May 4 2023 Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart negotiations with lawyers who rebuffed Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps for the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.
This is the solution to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be made. Is talc in supplements bad for you. But it’ll need more money – more billions of dollars from Johnson & Johnson.
Lawyers are split on whether to take the proposal or not and not all clients see the issue the same way their attorney does. Second bankruptcy cases are likely to fail the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine if she will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.
May 3 2023 Update: A group of cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested an order from they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation involving talc products. The group representing the claimants has filed a motion this week, asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back the lower court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Is talc in supplements bad for you. The committee also requested that the halted tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year with the possibility of an $8.9 billion deal. The committee argues that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s third Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J should be subject to urgent Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s global vice-president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J plans to file a statement to the appeals court calling the request an “desperate and legally deficient effort” by a few of law firms with conflicting financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: One frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers turn down $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s a lot of money. But there are a lot of victims. Is talc in supplements bad for you. These are actually a good cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week in two talc trials which ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon ended in the verdict that was $18.1 million. The following month, a second talc mesothelioma case went to trials at South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the most prominent manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: In the year 2023, when J&J initially tried to take the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it came with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. There was no one among the talc victims who believed in the offer. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 if the talc plaintiffs agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a substantial part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their lawyers. Is talc in supplements bad for you. But 75% of the plaintiffs in the talc category, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan is a difficult road due to the sheer number of lawyers with vast stocks of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed to the settlement.
What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc plaintiffs have demanded a judge disqualify the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially troubled. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders caused cancer. Is talc in supplements bad for you. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that LTL was not eligible for bankruptcy relief as it failed to show financial trouble.
The plaintiffs argue that the third Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from firms representing an estimated 60,000 people who are claiming. It’s fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.
April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. While trials in talc lawsuits are paused for a minimum period of 60 days but new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Is talc in supplements bad for you. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s attempt to revive its plan with a second bankruptcy trial.
April 13 2023 Update: The most important story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 year period settlement offered. Lawyers representing cancer victims in MDL class action MDL group action pledged to fight the settlement alongside the talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough money for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Is talc in supplements bad for you. They argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or even litigate individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.
However, there is a second set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership group in this class action. They have amassed many thousands of cases. This group wants to settle for what many argue is less than the victims deserve. Their argument seems to be twofold. First, they argue the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.
That is a hard argument to argue. However, their second argument has more force: the victims can not afford to wait any longer and need their money now.
April 12 2023 Update: Some people are looking for ways J&J could file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and confusing. But let’s try to explain it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to deal with both present and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. It believes that it will be less expensive in the event of a bankruptcy component that applies pressure for a settlement. Is talc in supplements bad for you. In a quest to cover the 400-year span of American history, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlements more fairly and more efficiently than trial courts where litigants are awarded significant settlements while others get nothing.
The essence in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of the profit-making company that has an entity to assume the legal risk and declare bankruptcy – something Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. But it also said that the subsidiary was not in financial difficulty because J&J promised unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding aspect of the holding and didn’t promise to provide unlimited funding for the litigation. The company claims that new financing agreements with its subsidiary will address appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. As if providing victims with less money would solve the overall issue.
Lawyers representing cancer patients who oppose the deal counter this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s decision. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the biggest “fraudulent transaction of assets in United States history.”
In spite of the legal jargon, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. But it is a way to push for this $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.
April 10 2023 Update: Bloomberg provides an insightful article about a new law of New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder class action lawsuit. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of profits. J&J is now offering to pay $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.
The involvement of the funders is made public due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funders outside the state. The rules aim to tackle the growing demands for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you add up federal and state infant powder litigation. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has pros and cons. There is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people as well as large corporations in the courtroom.
April 4 2023 Update: It is fun to watch the worm turn in this litigation. J&J has taken another blow this week when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy before the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have halted the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt entity over one year back. Is talc in supplements bad for you. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal just a few months ago the stay was removed. J&J was hoping to have it remain in effect until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that for the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc cases were joined to the MDL during the month of March increasing the number of cases that are pending to 37,522.
February 25 2023 Update The following information is available: A Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into how much J&J products containing talc have cost the government in the years.
Recently, in an open letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc-based products for years while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
Is talc in supplements bad for you. J&J needs to start making fair settlement offers to victims, in order in putting this behind. This is a disgrace to one of the greatest firms.
February 14 , 2023 Update: At the hearing held today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc in supplements bad for you. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!