You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc safe for dogs. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would make payments of $400 million to US state AGs. Is Talc Safe For Dogs .
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to address U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a larger $8.9 billion deal to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder as well as other talc products cause cancer. Is talc safe for dogs.
J&J affiliate LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm intends to pay for different types of cancer sufferers in bankruptcy settlement. Is talc safe for dogs. J&J has said that its Talc products are safe, and won’t cause cancer. J&J is seeking an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from being filed in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle claims brought with state attorneys general alleging that J&J was in violation of the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws by misleading consumers about the safety of its talc products.
Several states had begun consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to the first bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from proceeding in 2021. Is talc safe for dogs. New Mexico and Mississippi had already brought suits in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then as well as the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands according to court papers.
New Mexico and Mississippi have taken steps to halt the bankruptcy of LTL, joining cancer victims as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have claimed that a lucrative company like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for struggling debtors.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the bankruptcy lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court ruled the LTL did not have “financial trouble” and therefore not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Is talc safe for dogs. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again in just two hours following the dismissal, arguing the second bankruptcy was different in that there was less money available and had a greater chance of securing the possibility of settling.
New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates the state’s law enforcement authority in attempting to unilaterally limit LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.
Is Talc Safe For Dogs
LTL’s new filings also included more information about how the company would assess and pay for cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.
The most significant payments under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to the age of 45, and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.
From there, the proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the type and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of usage of talc and other variables. Is talc safe for dogs. For instance an individual who was using talc products weekly, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with an ovarian cancer stage II by age 55 may be eligible to receive a payment of $21,125 under the plan.
Judge orders J&J and talc opponents engage in settlement talks.
Following another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to implement a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the plan to enter into talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.
In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL Management, a subsidiary created by J&J to manage the claims company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Is talc safe for dogs. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the proposal, another group is against the settlement.
This week, the opposition group, called”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to dismiss the case saying that LTL is not considered to be in financial hardship.
“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a small number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Is talc safe for dogs. “The law firms behind their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that clash with, differ from and oppose the interests of their clients. We’ll be submitting a response before the court of appeals.”
Is talc safe for dogs. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM that is home to more than mesothelioma patients who have sued J&J for bankruptcy, told the company’s second bankruptcy try failed.
“J&J publishes press release about how wonderful its plan is while simultaneously demanding that plan details–including what individual sick people would actually receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What do they have to keep secret?”
Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new strategy for reorganization, under the supervision by two mediators.
As of February 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free J&J from the thousands of lawsuits concerning its talcum products.
In the month of January, an appeals court of the federal government overturned the ruling, ruling that the business could not be considered in “financial financial distress.”
When J&J’s attempt to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court was denied on April 1, J&J declared bankruptcy roughly two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether to allow another bankruptcy.
J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B talc litigation charge.
With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases have been held. Is talc safe for dogs. The company is requesting that claimants take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% support for the deal to go through.
Alongside the group of talc lawyers that criticized LTL’s bankruptcy plan as well, the U.S. Trustee, a branch belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.
In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” The doors “are not open to any parties that do not have a legitimate purpose or that seek to use bankruptcy to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.
For its part, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its products containing talc, such as the famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market, first on North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.
J&J is determined to stay clear of the costly business of going to court. It has won the majority of cases that were decided through trial, though some losses have been punitive.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri produced an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.
Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are in appeal or decided. Out of 41 trials 32 of them ended in a win by J&J either through a mistrial or plaintiff verdict that was annulled on appeal. Is talc safe for dogs. In addition, J&J in 2020 moved to settle over 1,000 cases for $100 million, Bloomberg announced at that time.
Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Is Talc Safe For Dogs
Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Is talc safe for dogs. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products such as Shower to Shower Powder along with Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer in some women.
This page provides the J&J Talc Power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amounts of these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.
Is the deadline for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe that the deadline has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or request a no-cost and quick case review online.
Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Is Talc Safe For Dogs
June 2 2023 Update: During the trial for asbestos-containing talc at the trial in California yesterday, technical glitches interrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Is talc safe for dogs. Jurors who were watching from home via Zoom and hearing the Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the 70s research that claimed asbestos was present in their product, but the trial was abruptly closed.
The plaintiff was able to present their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He also testified that his team advised J&J in 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos the talc of the company, but with lower than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.
June 1st, 2023 Update: Is talc safe for dogs. The first trial since J&J has decided to separate its Talc division, and then declare bankrupt marks an important moment in the ongoing talc lawsuit saga. Trial started on Monday in the heartbreaking trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which lawyers on both sides believe is a grave tragedy.
Opening statements revealed the stark differences in each side’s story. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. In the words of attorney Johnson & Johnson tried to alter the definition of asbestos, despite internal documents from between 1978 and 1994 that showed fibers discovered in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.
Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance as we progress of this trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma case and its distinctive issues in comparison to other lawsuits involving talcum powder, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could inflict an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.
May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc business vigorously defended their 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of the talc injury plaintiffs. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the company argued that the case was fundamentally different from the first filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion from J&J which is the largest settlement ever in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Is talc safe for dogs. It was not mentioned how the amount of the settlement means it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from numerous plaintiffs’ law firms representing over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is difficult to verify but is probably incorrect.
May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the first trial concerning its cosmetic talc products allegedly that contain asbestos is scheduled to begin jury selection on Monday in California in Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable jurisdiction for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure in J&J’s product which that the company does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc products.
May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be appointed to the position of future claims representative. This is which is vitally essential to the resolution of the claims involving talc. Is talc safe for dogs. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs throughout the country was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be named to the position again, but lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing on the grounds that Ellis has an interest conflict that would prevent her from being appointed to that post again. The dispute stems from fact that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the hotly contesting second bankruptcy, raising doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy is likely to get dismissed anyway.
May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J made up to handle the bankruptcy of talc informed a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to pay the claims made by states accusing the company of deceptive advertising for its talc product. Is talc safe for dogs. This amounts to an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J will be able to push the baby powder settlements in these figures. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer seems like a huge sum initially, it does not look very appealing when you do the math. This settlement offer based on our rough calculations – would not pay victims much more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. That is not enough.
May 15, 2023 Update: J&J might be facing lawsuit by an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Is talc safe for dogs. The group argues that J&J intentionally withdrew a $61.5 billion funding agreement together with its parent company, LTL Management LLC, in order to create a false sense of financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of victims’ compensation rights. They plan to explore J&J’s actions in the wake of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy case.
May 10, 2023 Update: Next week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy application by J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. However, in the meantime, it has approved an Order calling for both parties to participate in a new settlement mediation with the hopes of achieving an international settlement agreement can be reached.
May 5 2023 Update: The talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Is talc safe for dogs. Over 2700 people have sued the company, and it was paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million settlement at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for equitable distribution of assets to talc claimants, rather than being confiscated by the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to legal proceedings.
May 4 2023 Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch settlement discussions with lawyers who turned down the company’s proposed $8.9 billion offer for settlement. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps for another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.
This is the way to settle these claims for J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to get done. Is talc safe for dogs. But it’ll need additional money – perhaps billions of dollars – of Johnson & Johnson.
Lawyers are divided over whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see the issue in the same manner their lawyer does. A second bankruptcy proceeding is likely to fail, with Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide whether to remove the bankruptcy after the second.
May 3, 2023 Update: A group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested to have the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block the litigation involving talc products. The group of talc claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday, asking to the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back to a lower court, with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Is talc safe for dogs. They also requested that the stopped tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to continue.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered an $8.9 billion payment. The committee believes that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J is a reason for an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J plans to file a statement to the appeals court calling the request an “desperate and legally insufficient move” by a handful of law firms who have different financial interests.
May 1st, 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their attorneys turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s an immense amount of money. However, there are lots of victims. Is talc safe for dogs. And these are really good case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week when two talc cases led to huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon resulted in the verdict worth $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for the court in South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million for the plaintiff. Both cases were defended by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the largest suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: J&J first tried to bring the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to put aside $2 billion to settle the case. The sum was ridiculously low. All of the talc plaintiffs were in favor of it. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they also have the backing of a significant part of the talc-related plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Is talc safe for dogs. But with 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan, it a tough road since there are so many lawyers with massive stocks of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed to the settlement.
What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc patients have sought a court order to reject their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially troubled. LTL requested Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Is talc safe for dogs. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said LTL was not a candidate to receive bankruptcy relief because it had not demonstrated financial distress.
The plaintiffs argue that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system and that the case is being handled in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from firms representing approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over what they believe is an $8.9 billion offer for settlement.
April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. While trials in the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for a minimum of 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Is talc safe for dogs. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s attempt to relaunch its strategy in another bankruptcy case.
April 13, 2023 Update: big story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims in MDL class action MDL collective action pledged to challenge the settlement talc claimants. Why? They believe it’s not enough money for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Is talc safe for dogs. They argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or even litigate individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.
However, there is a second group of lawyers that is not part of the leadership group in this class action. They have amassed many thousands of cases. This group wants to settle now in what many believe to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be two-fold. First, they argue that the settlement – about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.
It’s a difficult argument to argue. The second argument is more force: the victims can now not wait and they want the money immediately.
April 12 2023 Update: People are looking for ways J&J could file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and confusing. Let’s try to clarify it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only method to deal with both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. That is, it believes that it will be less expensive if there is a bankruptcy element that creates pressure for a settlement. Is talc safe for dogs. Going back to hundreds of years of American time, the business argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlements more fairly and efficiently than trial courts, where some litigants receive significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.
The essence in this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – a profitable company making an entity to assume the legal liability and declare bankruptcy – something Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. But it also said it was not in financial distress due to the fact that J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J took advantage of the funding unlimited part of the holding and didn’t promise that it would provide unlimited funds for the litigation. The company says that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary address appeals court’s concerns while still offering claim payment funds. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the overarching problem.
Attorneys representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared attorneys representing the victims claim it the biggest “fraudulent transfer that has occurred in United States history.”
Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. But it is a way to push for this $8.9 billion settlement and keep pressure on plaintiffs.
April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg is running an intriguing report on a brand new law that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the suit for class actions. Litigation funders Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange for a share of any winnings. J&J is now willing to pay $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.
The involvement of the funders is public knowledge due to a New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about outside funding backers. The rules aim to address the rising calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you take into account federal and state infant powder litigation. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits has pros and cons. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between people and big corporations in the courtroom.
April 4, 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turning in this legal battle. J&J has taken another blow this week, when the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court. It has froze the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped any new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liability off into a bankrupt entity over a year ago. Is talc safe for dogs. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient just a few months ago the stay was revoked. J&J wanted to see it stayed in place until the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that of the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in just over a year. Seven new talc cases were brought into the MDL during the month of March, bringing the total number of cases pending to 37,522.
February 25, 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee has now demanded that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into the cost J&J product containing talc has cost the government in the decades.
Recently, in an open letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) claimed that J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc products over years while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the products. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
Is talc safe for dogs. J&J must begin making reasonable settlements to victims to getting this behind. This is a disgrace to one of the world’s greatest companies.
February 14 2023 Update: At an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Is talc safe for dogs. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!