Johnson Johnson Talc Proven To Contain Asbestos – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would make payments of 400 million dollars to US state AGs. Johnson Johnson Talc Proven To Contain Asbestos .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its wider $8.9 billion effort to settle allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc ingredients cause cancer. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company intends to pay different types of cancer victims in the bankruptcy settlement. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. J&J has stated that its Talc products are safe and do not cause cancer. It is attempting for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from arising in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims filed from state attorney generals alleging that J&J was in violation of laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York and consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers regarding the quality of its talc products.

Some states had started consumer protection actions against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from proceeding in 2021. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched suit against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas in LTL’s court documents.

 

 

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy along with cancer sufferers as well as the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a profitable firm like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for those struggling with debt.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed following similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appeals court decided that LTL had not been in “financial difficulty” and was not eligible for bankruptcy protection. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time less than two hours after the dismissal, arguing the second bankruptcy was different because it had less money and more backing for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the law enforcement powers of the state by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company for state consumer protection laws.

 

Johnson Johnson Talc Proven To Contain Asbestos

LTL’s recent filings also provided more information about the way in which the company will evaluate and pay cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45, and $260,000 for people diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer prior to age 45.

The proposed settlement offers discounts based on the type and severity of cancer, the individual’s age, history of usage of talc and other variables. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. For instance someone who regularly used daily talc products, had the family history of ovarian cancer, and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary by age 55 may be eligible to receive a payout of $21,125 according to the plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc oppositionists to discuss settlement negotiations.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the strategy to engage in settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to hold the claims–the company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. While a firm representing plaintiffs agree with the deal, another group is opposed to the offer.

This week, the opposition group, known as”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants in the bankruptcy court, demanded to dismiss this case arguing that LTL is not considered to be financially distressed.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a few of law firms to try to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. “The law firms behind their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that are in conflict with, differ from and infringe on the rights which their clientele. We’ll soon submit an appeal to the appellate court.”

Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which boasts more than patients with mesothelioma who have filed lawsuits against J&J and J&J, has said that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort will fail.

“J&J publishes press release about how great its plan is, while requesting that details of the plan, such as what the individual sick individuals would receive,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do they have to hide?”

 

talcumpowdercancerlawsuit

 

Kaplan has commanded the parties to devise a second reorganization plan, under the oversight and supervision of mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan confirmed J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free the company from the thousands of lawsuits related to its talcum-based products.

However, in January of this year a federal appeals court ruled against the verdict, ruling that the company could not be considered in “financial trouble.”

When J&J’s attempt to contest the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected at the end of April J&J filed for its second bankruptcy two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether to allow an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

In the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases were placed suspended. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. The company would like claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J requires 75% support in order for the agreement to be accepted.

In addition to the group of talc lawyers who panned LTL’s bankruptcy plan, the U.S. Trustee, a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file motions to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not open to parties that lack a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

To its credit, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its Talc products, which includes its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market–first in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the costly business of going to trial. The company has won most of the cases decided during trial, however, certain losses have been extremely harsh.
A well-known trial in Missouri ended in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are in appeal or concluded. Of the 41 trials, 32 have resulted in winning for J&J either through a mistrial or verdict of a plaintiff dismissed after appeal. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. Additionally, the company in 2020 moved to settle more than 1000 cases at a cost of 100 million dollars, Bloomberg reported at the time.

 

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Johnson Johnson Talc Proven To Contain Asbestos

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page provides a J&J talc power litigation update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amounts in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to bring a talcum lawsuit? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or get a no-cost, quick case review online.

 

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Johnson Johnson Talc Proven To Contain Asbestos

June 2 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc case in California yesterday, a few technical glitches interrupted the opening speech of defense lawyers. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. Jurors who were watching at home via Zoom however, heard Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the science of the 70s that claimed asbestos was present in their product prior to the opening was abruptly ended.

The plaintiff had the opportunity to introduce their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer explained that the existence of other minerals in talc is expected. He said that his team informed J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc produced by the company, although in less than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. The first trial since J&J decided to spin off its Talc section and declaring bankruptcy marks an important point within the ongoing litigation story. Trial started on Monday in the heartbreaking case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year, a diagnosis lawyers on both sides believe is a grave tragedy.

Opening statements revealed huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. In the words of attorney the company attempted to manipulate the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents from 1998 and 1994 that show asbestos fibers found in tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinct nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its unique challenges compared to other talcum powder lawsuits, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could be the company with a major setback in its hope of gaining broad acceptance for their proposed settlement among plaintiffs.

May 31, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit strongly defended its second Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from talc injury claimants. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing was distinct from the previous filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion by J&J which is the largest settlement ever made in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. There was no mention of how the magnitude of the settlement indicates that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms representing over 600,00 claimants. This is hard to verify however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the first trial concerning its cosmetic talc items allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to begin jury selection on Monday, California at Alameda County Superior Court, which is a well-known place for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure in J&J’s product which that the company is denying. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are now fighting over who should be chosen to fill the post of future claims representative, the role is crucially critical to resolving claim for talc. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs all over the nation was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be named to the position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs have raised objections because Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest that should prevent her from holding that position once more. The issue stems from the issue that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the controversially contested second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her ability to be neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy will likely to be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J formed to handle the bankruptcy of talc disclosed to the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to settle claims of states that accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc products. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine any scenario in which J&J could push these settlements for babies given these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer sounds like a large sum initially, it may not look very appealing when you consider the math. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations would not provide victims with much more than a median settlement of $100,000 per case. It’s not enough.

May 15, 2023, Update J&J could be facing lawsuit by an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. The group contends that J&J intentionally canceled the $61.5 billion contract for funding with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of rights of victims’ compensation. They are planning to study J&J’s actions in the wake of the dismissal of the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week this week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy application from J&J company LTL Management. However, in the meantime, LTL Management has filed an Order calling for both parties to take part in a new settlement negotiation to see if it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement reached.

May 5th 2023: Update on Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. Over 2,700 people have sued the company and it is spending $1 million a month to defend its legal position. The company’s most recent $29 million verdict in South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for an equitable distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being seized in the hands of the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also declared bankruptcy because of the litigation.

May 4 2023, Update U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen talks on settlement with lawyers who turned down Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion agreement. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared before a judge to discuss next steps to take in the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. A settlement for baby powder can get done. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. But it will require more money – more billions of dollars from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see this issue the same way their attorney does. A second bankruptcy proceeding is destined to fail, the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to decide whether to remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3 2023 Update The group of cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked for the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it attempts to block litigation regarding talc-related products. The group representing the claimants filed a motion on Tuesday, asking for the Third Circuit to consider their case and send it back an earlier court with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. They also asked that halted tort litigation against J&J allow the litigation to proceed.
LTL filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering the possibility of an $8.9 billion payment. The committee believes that the recent decision allowing LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J is a reason for urgent Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a reply in the appeals court saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally deficient attempt” by a small number of law firms with different financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A common question that people ask is how plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn off $8.9 billion. That’s of course an enormous amount of money. There are a lot of victims. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. These are an excellent arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week with two talc trials resulted in big verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon resulted in a verdict that was $18.1 million. In the same month, a different mesothelioma-related talc case went to trial on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the top suppliers of talc within the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: J&J initially attempted to pull the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to put aside $2 billion for settlements. The amount was absurdly low. There was no one among the talc victims who agreed with it. This time, however, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they have the backing of a significant part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their attorneys. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. But 75% of the talc plaintiffs, which is required for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task because of the number of lawyers who have massive stocks of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed towards the agreement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 update: Talc plaintiffs have sought a court order to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, saying the company is not financially strained. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. LTL was denied Chapter 11 in January. 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January The court ruled that the company was not eligible for bankruptcy relief as it failed to show financial distress.

The claimants argue that the third Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being conducted in bad faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from firms representing about 60,000 potential people who are claiming. It’s safe to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims are divided over this $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold a baby powder that contained a chemical that causes cancer. While trials in the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its strategy with another bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023: Update on the biggest story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims in the MDL class action have pledged to fight the settlement alongside talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough money for more than 70,000 cancer victims. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. The lawyers say that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or settle individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there’s a separate set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership of this class action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated the equivalent of tens of thousands of lawsuits. The group is seeking to settle for what is believed to be less than these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be twofold. The first is that they claim the settlement – about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

That is a hard argument to argue. However, their second argument has more substance: the victims will now not wait and they want the money immediately.

April 12, 2023 Update: People are seeking out how J&J can go through bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and complex. Let’s try to clarify the issue in a simple way.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to address both present and future lawsuits involving talc conclusively. It thinks it will pay less if there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure for a settlement. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. In a quest to cover the 400-year span of American history, the company asserts that bankruptcy benefits everyone by dispersing settlement payments more equitably and effectively than trial courts, where some litigants receive significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The essence in the 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves an enterprise that is profitable, forming a subsidiary to take the legal burden and declare bankruptcy – Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated the company was in financial crisis because J&J promised unlimited funding.
This is why J&J jumped on the unlimited funding aspect of the deal but did not pledge that it would provide unlimited funds for lawsuits. The company claims that updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the concerns of the appeals court while supplying funds for claim payments. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the overarching problem.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter this with what you conclude is countering legal nonsense with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier ruling. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed attorneys representing the victims claim it the biggest “fraudulent deal in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. But it’s a way of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg is running an intriguing article on a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder Class action suit. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a portion of any winnings. J&J has now offered that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is public information due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details regarding outside funding backers. This rule is intended to tackle the growing demands for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you add up federal and state child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits has pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are seeing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individuals and big companies in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It is enjoyable to see the worm turn in this legal battle. J&J suffered another setback this week, when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place while J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy before the U.S. Supreme Court. Automatic stays have halted thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped any new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liability into a bankrupt subsidiary over one year back. Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid only a few months back, the stay was lifted. J&J had hoped to have it continue in the meantime of hearing the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance for the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16th, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay in effect, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action for talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc lawsuits were included in the MDL in the past month which brings the total number of cases in the pending process up to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that be the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation to determine how much J&J talc products have cost the government over the decades.
A recent email addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc-based products for long while tax dollars utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the products. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s loss to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlements to victims to begin getting this behind it. It’s a mark on one of the greatest firms.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.

 

You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Johnson Johnson talc proven to contain asbestos. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

 

  • How Much Asbestos In Talc – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Order Online Divorce Decree Texas – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Talc Baby Powder Dry Shampoo – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Rancho Cucamonga Divorce Court Online Open Access – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Places To Get A Divorce Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Talc Asbestos Lawsuit – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Online Divorce Service – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Read Divorce Papers Online – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  • Talcum Powder Lawsuit Female Genital Area – Are You Eligible To File A Talc Lawsuit?
  • Arizona Online Divorce Forms – Cheap Online Divorce Lawyers Near Me
  •  

  • Terms of Use
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Finding A Good Divorce Lawyer
  • About
  •  

    >>> Johnson Johnson Talc Proven To Contain Asbestos

    You May Also Like