You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would pay the sum of $400 million US state AGs. No Talc In Johnson’s Baby Powder .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a larger $8.9 billion plan to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder and other talc items cause cancer. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm intends to pay different types of cancer victims as part of an arrangement for bankruptcy. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. J&J has claimed that its products containing talc are safe and do not cause cancer. J&J is seeking another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy and prevent new cases from coming forward in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into an additional trust to settle claims filed from state attorney generals alleging that J&J did not comply with states’ unfair practices as well as consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the dangers of its talc products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection cases against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from moving forward in 2021. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed lawsuits in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then, and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas in LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy, joining cancer victims as well as the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a successful business like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections aimed at people with debt problems.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was dismissed after similar arguments. The U.S. appeals court decided in favor of LTL wasn’t in “financial financial distress” and ineligible under bankruptcy law. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time in just two hours following the decision to dismiss, arguing that its second attempt was different due to the fact that it had less money available and had a greater chance of securing the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion for dismissal that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates state law enforcement authorities in attempting to unilaterally limit the liability of the company for state consumer protection actions.

No Talc In Johnson’s Baby Powder

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include more details on how the company would assess and pay cancer claims if the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to the age of 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer prior to age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the type and severity of cancer, the patient’s age, the history of using talc and other factors. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. For example the case of a woman who used talc products on a weekly basis, who had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with stage II ovarian cancer by age 55 may qualify for a $21,125 payout under the program.

Judge ordains J&J, talc opponents to take part in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the strategy to engage in talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to manage the claims company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs is in favor of the settlement, a different group opposes the move.

The previous week, the opposition group, known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition saying that LTL is not a factor in financial hardship.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a tiny number of law firms to try to prevent claimants from voting on the resolution plan – a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. “The law firms involved in this filing have financial interests that do not align with, diverge from, and contravene those which their clientele. We’ll soon submit a response before the court of appeals.”

No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which has more than 80 mesothelioma patients who have sued J&J for bankruptcy, told the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J is likely to fail.

“J&J issue press releases about how wonderful its plans are, but is requesting that details of the plan, such as what the individual sick individuals would receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in a statement. “What do J&J have to conceal?”

Kaplan has directed the parties to develop a new restructuring plan, with the supervision by two mediators.

The court in February of 2022 Kaplan confirmed J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free J&J from the hundreds of thousands of claims regarding its talcum products.

But in January of this year a federal appeals court overturned the ruling, ruling that the company was not able to be considered to be in “financial difficulty.”

After J&J’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was denied on April 1, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy roughly two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether or not to approve to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases were placed in limbo. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. The company is requesting that claimants vote on accepting their settlement. J&J needs 75% approval for the deal to pass.

In addition to the gang of talc attorneys who have panned LTL’s bankruptcy plan as well, the U.S. Trustee is an arm belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file an application to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a statement this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” The doors “are not open to any parties that do not have a legitimate purpose or that seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors,” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its products containing talc, such as its famous baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market, first on North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the cost of going to court. It has won the majority of the cases that have been decided at trial, but certain losses have been extremely punishing.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri led to a $4.7 billion judgment against the drug manufacturer, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are appealing or decided. Out of 41 trials, 32 of them ended in the favor of J&J either through a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was annulled upon appeal. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. In addition, J&J has announced plans to settle around 1000 cases for $100 million, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – No Talc In Johnson’s Baby Powder

Our lawyers are handling baby powder cases in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits for Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like Shower to Shower Powder or Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page gives an J&J talc power litigation update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amount in these cases of ovarian cancer.

Has the deadline passed for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many people who think the statute of limitations has run out to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – No Talc In Johnson’s Baby Powder

June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc case at the trial in California yesterday, some technical issues disrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. Jurors from home via Zoom and hearing the Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubts about the 70s research claiming asbestos was present in their product, but the trial was abruptly closed.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff was able to present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of additional minerals along with talc is expected. He testified that his team informed J&J in 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc produced by the company, although at less than 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. First trial after J&J made the decision to split its talc segment and file for bankruptcy is a pivotal moment for the ongoing litigation controversy. Trial started on Monday in the harrowing case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which both sides of the argument agree is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements revealed the sharp differences in the two sides’ narrative. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. According to the attorney, the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos in spite of internal documents dating from 1998 and 1994 that show asbestos fibers that were found in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the course of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma case and its distinct issues compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could result in an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.

May 31st 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc business vigorously defended the 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from injured talc claimants. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the case differed fundamentally from the earlier filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion from J&J which is the largest ever settlement in a mass tort bankruptcy case. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. It was not mentioned how this amount means it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than sixty thousand claimants. This is difficult to verify but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the first trial on the cosmetic talc products it claims to with asbestos content is scheduled to start jury selection on Monday, California in Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored place for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure through J&J’s products, an allegation the company does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently battling over who should be appointed to the role of a future claims representative. This is a role that is critically essential in resolving the claim for talc. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who is frequently involved in MDLs all over the nation was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed to this position yet again, but the lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing because Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest which should stop her from holding that position again. The conflict stems from the possibility that Ellis was believed to have been involved in the creation of the hotly contested second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capacity to be neutral. The reality is the bankruptcy will be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J created to handle the bankruptcy of talc has informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to settle the claims made by states accusing the company of deceptive advertising for its talc-based products. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer victims. It’s difficult to envision an eventuality where J&J will be able to push these baby powder settlements through in these figures. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a huge sum initially, it does not look good when you do the math. This settlement proposal – by our estimates – will not offer victims anything more than a median settlement of $100,000 per case. That’s not enough.

May 15, 2023 Update J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit brought by an advocacy group that represents cancer victims. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. The group contends that J&J intentionally withdrew an $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act is a fraud transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They are planning to study J&J’s actions after the announcement of the dismissal of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week this week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments regarding a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed of J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. However, in the meantime LTL Management has filed an Order which requires both sides to take part in a new settlement negotiation to see if a global settlement deal can brokered.

May 5, 2023: Update on Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the company and the company was spending $1 million a month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to pursue bankruptcy protection, and arguing for a fair distribution of assets between the claimants of talc instead of being seized through the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have filed for bankruptcy due to legal proceedings.

May 4, 2023 update: U.S. bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart talks on settlement with lawyers who turned down the proposed $8.9 billion offer for settlement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the way to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can be made. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. However, it’ll require more money, more billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether or not to agree with the proposal and not every client views the issue the same way their lawyer sees it. This second case of bankruptcy is expected to be a failure with Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine if she will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.

May 3 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients who have sued Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested that they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation surrounding talc-based products. The group representing the claimants filed a motion on Tuesday asking the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back the lower court, with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. They also asked that lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J continue to proceed.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year, offering an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee says that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J, warrants an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that it be requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a reply in the appeals court, saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally flawed effort” by a select group of law firms that have different financial interests.
May 1, 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how could the plaintiffs’ lawyers and their clients turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s an enormous amount of money. But there are plenty of victims. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. And these are really good claims for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week by two talc-related trials that resulted in big verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon ended in the verdict of $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma talc case was brought to trials at South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the leading suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30, 2023 Update: When J&J initially attempted to pull the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to put aside $2 billion for settlements. The amount was absurdly low. There was no one among the talc victims who believed in the offer. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they also have the backing of a significant portion of the talc plaintiffs and their attorneys. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. However, 75% of plaintiffs of talc are required to approve bankruptcy plans It’s a long and difficult process with so many lawyers with massive inventory of baby powder lawsuits that are opposed against the proposed settlement.

What could solve the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc cancer claimants have asked a judge to reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially distressed. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company wasn’t eligible for bankruptcy relief as it was unable to demonstrate financial distress.

The claimants contend that LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 case is an abuse of the bankruptcy system and that it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant backing” from companies representing around 60,000 claimants. It’s safe to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims are divided over this $8.9 billion deal.

April 21, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. While trials in talc lawsuits are paused for a minimum of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its strategy with a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13 2023 update: the major news is the $8.9 billion over 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims in the MDL collective action vowed to fight the settlement alongside the talc claimants. Why? They think it is not enough to pay for more than 70,000 cancer victims. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or settle individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there’s a separate group of lawyers outside of the leadership group in group action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated tens of thousands of cases. They want to settle today with what they believe is far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument is two-fold. First, they argue that the settlement – about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff is fair.

This is an argument that is difficult to argue. However, their second argument has more force: victims should be no longer patient and demand to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are wondering if J&J could file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complicated and convoluted. Let’s try to simplify it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to settle both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. That is, it believes it can pay less in the event of a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to settle. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. In a quest to cover the 400-year span of American history, the firm believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties by distributing settlement payments more equitably and efficiently than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial award while others do not.

The essence of the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of one that makes a profit, but a subsidiary to take the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was in financial trouble due to the fact that J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Then J&J jumped on the unlimited funding aspect of the deal and didn’t make any promises to fund unlimited lawsuits. The company says that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the concerns of the appellate court, while supplying funds for claim payments. As if offering victims less money would solve the problem at hand.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who do not agree with the agreement counter the agreement with what is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. Hyperbole is not exempt: victims’ lawyers call it the most significant “fraudulent deal of assets in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. However, it’s a means to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023, Update Bloomberg has an interesting article on a new law of New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the plaintiffs in the class action. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of wins. J&J has now offered that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is made public due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information about funding sources outside of the. The law is designed to tackle the growing demands for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you combine federal and state infant powder litigation. Third-party financing in mass tort cases is not without its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are witnessing how third-party funding can level the playing field between people and big companies in court.

April 4, 2023 Update: It is pleasing to see the worm turning in this case. J&J suffered another setback this week when they were denied by the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision at the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay stopped the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and stopped new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc liability into a bankrupt entity over a year earlier. No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient only a few months back, the stay was removed. J&J had hoped to have it remain in effect until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The chance the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16th, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay having been fully lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL within a year. Seven new talc lawsuits were included in the MDL during the month of March, bringing the total number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update The following information is available: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation to determine how much J&J Talc products have cost the government in the years.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc products over many years, while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the chemicals. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

No talc in Johnson’s baby powder. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlements to victims, in order the process of putting all this behind it. This is a disgrace to one of the most prestigious businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: During an earlier hearing at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.