You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Safe talc free powder. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement would make payments of the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Safe Talc Free Powder .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put the amount of $400 million for resolving U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a larger $8.9 billion settlement of claims that its Baby Powder and other talc products cause cancer. Safe talc free powder.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that describes how the company will pay various types of cancer sufferers in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Safe talc free powder. J&J has said that its talc products are safe and don’t cause cancer. It is attempting for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from arising in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plans would deposit $400 million into an additional trust to settle claims made with state attorneys general claiming that J&J violated laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York as well as consumer protection laws by misleading consumers about the safety of its talc products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from moving forward in 2021. Safe talc free powder. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed suit against Johnson & Johnson before then and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands in LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. have argued that a successful company such as J&J is not eligible for bankruptcy protections meant for struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was dismissed following similar arguments. A U.S. appeals court ruled in favor of LTL wasn’t in “financial financial distress” and thus not eligible for bankruptcy protection. Safe talc free powder. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time within two hours of the dismissal, arguing the second bankruptcy was different in that it was able to borrow less and had a greater chance of securing an agreement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates state law enforcement authorities by attempting unilaterally to cap the liability of the company in state consumer protection measures.

Safe Talc Free Powder

LTL’s recent filings also provided more details on how the company would assess and pay claims for cancer in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The most significant payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with mesothelioma that is terminal before the age of 45, and $260,000 for patients diagnosed with cancer of the ovary before age 45.

The proposed settlement will offer discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, an individual’s age, previous talc use and other factors. Safe talc free powder. For instance someone who regularly used talc products on a weekly basis, who had an ovarian cancer family history, cancer and was diagnosed with Stage II cancer of the ovary when she was 55 could be in line for a $21,125 payment under the settlement plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc opponents to engage in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the plan to hold talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to settle claims – the company made a settlement offer of $8.9 billion. Safe talc free powder. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs supports the offer, another group opposes the deal.

This week, the opposition group, dubbed the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by arguing that LTL is not a factor financially distressed.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a tiny number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution, which the vast and growing majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Safe talc free powder. “The law firms that are behind their filing are financially oriented and have conflicts that do not align with, diverge from and are in opposition to the interests they represent. We will be submitting an appeal in the appeals court.”

Safe talc free powder. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which has more than 80 mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J, said that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J failed.

“J&J sends out press releases that boast about how amazing its plan is while simultaneously requesting that details of the plan, such as what individual sick people would actually be treated to,” Thompson said in an email. “What is J&J’s plan to keep secret?”

Kaplan has instructed both sides to develop a new strategy for reorganization, under the oversight by two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free J&J from the tens of thousands of claims concerning its talcum products.

But in January of this year, a federal appeals court ruled against the decision, deciding that the company could not be considered to be in “financial difficulty.”

The J&J’s plan to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed in April, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours later. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether or not to approve to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B cost of litigation involving talc.

In the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which the cases were in limbo. Safe talc free powder. The company would like claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J needs 75% of the vote for the deal to pass.

In addition to the team of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy play, the U.S. Trustee which is a division belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file an application to dismiss the second bankruptcy case of LTL.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not open to parties who do not have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to abuse the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors,” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their talc products, including its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has taken the products from the market and will first launch them for North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J wants to avoid the expense of going to trial. It has prevailed in most of the cases that have been decided in court, however some losses have been punitive.
A highly publicized trial in Missouri led to an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company, which was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are appealing or resolved. Out of 41 trials, 32 of them ended in a win by J&J as well as mistrials or plaintiff verdicts that were dismissed upon appeal. Safe talc free powder. In addition, J&J in 2020 moved to settle more than 1,000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg announced at that time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Safe Talc Free Powder

Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits across every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. Safe talc free powder. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as the Baby Powder or Shower to Shower, can cause ovarian cancer in some women.

This page provides the J&J Talc Power Update and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amounts of these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Did the deadline expire for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who believe that the time limit has expired to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or get a no-cost, quick case review online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Safe Talc Free Powder

June 2 2023 Update: In the asbestos talc trial at the trial in California yesterday, technical issues disrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Safe talc free powder. Jurors who were watching from their homes via Zoom but did not hear Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer voice his doubt about the 70s research claiming asbestos was present in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.

The plaintiff could present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of additional minerals along with the talc mineral is a given. He said that his team advised J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos the company’s talc, albeit in just 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Safe talc free powder. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J made the decision to split its Talc division, and then declare bankrupt is an important moment for the ongoing litigation drama. Trial started on Monday in the harrowing trial of a young plaintiff who was diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year, an illness that lawyers on both sides acknowledge is a tragic loss.

Opening statements revealed the distinct differences between each side’s narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive techniques in its research practices and throughout the litigation process. In the words of attorney Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter asbestos’ definition, despite internal documents dating back to between 1978 and 1994 that showed fibers discovered in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the progression of this trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its distinct issues compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder, a verdict favoring the plaintiff could result in a serious setback to J&J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc business was able to defend the two-time Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the situation was fundamentally different from the previous filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment to $8.9 billion by J&J, the largest settlement ever in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Safe talc free powder. Not mentioned: how the magnitude of the settlement signifies that it’s a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law companies representing over sixty thousand claimants. This is difficult to verify however it is likely to be incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson & Johnson’s 2021 bankruptcy filing, the first trial concerning its cosmetic talc items allegedly with asbestos content is scheduled to start jury selection Monday, May 24, California in Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products and the company does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the second J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently battling over who should be chosen to fill the role of the claims representative in the future, which is vitally essential to the resolution of the claims involving talc. Safe talc free powder. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense group wants Ellis to be appointed to this position and again, but attorneys for the talc plaintiffs are protesting due to the fact that Ellis has conflicts of interest which should stop her from assuming that position in the future. The conflict stems from the fact that Ellis was involved in drafting the hotly contested second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her ability to be neutral. It’s true that this bankruptcy is likely to be dismissed regardless.

May 17, 2023 Update: The fake company J&J made up for the talc bankruptcy informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to settle the claims of states that accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc products. Safe talc free powder. It’s a $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It’s difficult to imagine the scenario in which J&J can push these baby powder settlements through in these figures. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot of money initially, it may not look great after you calculate the figures. The proposed settlement based on our estimates – will not provide victims with much more than $100,000 per case. That’s not enough.

May 15, 2023 update: J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit by an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Safe talc free powder. The group argues that J&J intentionally canceled the $61.5 billion funding agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act is a fraud transfer of the rights of victims’ compensation. They will investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the decision to dismiss the LTL’s bankruptcy case in its first instance.

May 10, 2023 Update: Next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy application from J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime, however this bankruptcy court has issued an Order which requires both sides to take part in a new settlement mediation in the hope that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement reached.

May 5th, 2023 Update: Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Safe talc free powder. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the company and it is spending $1 million a month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing for equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being taken over from the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of the litigation.

May 4, 2023 Update: U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to restart talks on settlement with lawyers who rejected the company’s $8.9 billion agreement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps to take in another bankruptcy proceeding and Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement could be made. Safe talc free powder. But it’ll need additional money – perhaps billions of dollars by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether or not to accept the plan and not all clients see this issue the same way their attorney does. A second bankruptcy proceeding is destined to fail with Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide whether to remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3 2023 Update A group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested an order from they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation involving talc products. The group of talc claimants filed a motion on Tuesday requesting to the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back the lower court, with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Safe talc free powder. They also asked that the stopped tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to continue.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year with a $8.9 billion settlement. The committee believes that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J and J&J, requires the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee requested an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a statement in the appeals court, declaring the filing a “desperate and legally insufficient attempt” by a small number of law firms that have conflicting financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A common question that people ask is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s quite a sum. But there are a lot of victims. Safe talc free powder. These are actually a good arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week by two talc-related trials that have resulted in huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon led to the verdict worth $18.1 million. A month later, another talc mesothelioma case went to trials in South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million in favor of plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the most prominent suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J initially attempted to pull the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to set aside $2 billion for settlements. The amount was absurdly low. The talc plaintiffs had not were in favor of the offer. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims will allow a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a large section of the talc victims as well as their lawyers. Safe talc free powder. But 75% of the plaintiffs of talc are necessary for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road since there are so many lawyers with massive collections of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed against the proposed settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update: Talc cancer claimants have demanded a judge dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially strained. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Safe talc free powder. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial difficulties.

The claimants assert that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being pursued in bad good faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from firms representing approximately 60,000 claimants. It’s safe to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and the victims are split over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge ruled that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it sold baby powder that was contaminated and causing cancer. Although the trials for the talc lawsuits have been suspended for a minimum of 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed, and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Safe talc free powder. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s ridiculous effort to relaunch its strategy in a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13 2023: Update on the most important update is about the $8.9 billion over the next 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients who are part of the MDL Class Action have pledged to fight the settlement along with the talc claimants. Why? They think it is too little money for the 70,000 victims who have cancer. Safe talc free powder. The lawyers say that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or pursue individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there is another group of lawyers outside of the leadership of group action. They have amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. This group wants to settle the case now with what they believe is less than these victims deserve. Their argument seems to be two-fold. First, they argue the settlement of around 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff – is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to make. However, their second argument has more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand their money today.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are wondering if J&J can go through bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and confusing. Let’s try to clarify it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to deal with both present and future talc lawsuits conclusively. In other words, it thinks it can get a lower rate should there be an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to settle. Safe talc free powder. Going back to hundreds of years of American time, the business claims that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlement payments more equitably and more efficiently than trial courts where litigants are awarded significant award while others do not.

The essence in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a matter of one that makes a profit, but a subsidiary to take the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy Congress thought of when drafting its Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the subsidiary was not in financial difficulty due to the fact that J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
This is why J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the unlimited funding part of the contract and didn’t promise to offer unlimited funding for the litigation. The company says that its modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary address appeals court’s concerns, while offering funds to pay claims. As if providing victims with less money will solve the overarching problem.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who oppose the deal counter the agreement with what is countering legal nonsense with legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared attorneys representing the victims claim this the biggest “fraudulent move in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it’s a way of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023, Update Bloomberg is running an intriguing article on a new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged in exchange for a portion of wins. J&J is now willing an offer of $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is publicly available because of an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rules aim to respond to the increasing calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J is facing more than 60,000 claims when you take into account state and federal baby powder lawsuits. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has pros and cons. However, there is no doubt that we are seeing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people and big corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It is enjoyable to see the worm turning in this lawsuit. J&J suffered another setback this week, when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place in the meantime that J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy at the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay halted thousands of talcum cases and stopped new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc debts into a bankrupt entity over a year earlier. Safe talc free powder. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal a few months ago, the stay was removed. J&J had hoped to have it remain in effect until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. But, no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were brought into the MDL during the month of March and brought the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into the cost J&J products containing talc have cost the government over the decades.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of not recognizing the risks of its talc products over years while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the products. The demand comes just weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Safe talc free powder. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlement proposals to victims to begin the process of putting all this behind. This is a disgrace to one of the top firms.

February 14 2023 Update: In an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following his 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.