You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would provide $440 million US state AGs. Settlement With Johnson & Johnson .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion settlement of allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc product causes cancer. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company intends to pay different types of cancer victims as part of the bankruptcy settlement. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. J&J has said that its products containing talc are safe and won’t cause cancer. It is attempting for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits filed in bankruptcy, and to prevent any new cases from arising in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to a separate trust for claims brought from state attorney generals claiming that J&J did not comply with laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York and consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the security of its talc-based products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection measures against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented those investigations from taking place in 2021. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated actions against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands, according to LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s watchdog on bankruptcy, who argue that a profit-making firm like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections aimed at people with debt problems.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the bankruptcy cases was rejected after the same arguments. The U.S. appellate court decided that LTL was not in “financial trouble” and therefore not eligible under bankruptcy law. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. LTL made a new bankruptcy application in just two hours following the decision to dismiss, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different as it was able to borrow less and had a greater chance of securing the possibility of settling.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss LTL’s renewed bankruptcy violates state law enforcement powers by attempting unilaterally to cap the liability of the company for state consumer protection measures.

Settlement With Johnson & Johnson

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained more details on how the company plans to evaluate and pay cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for people diagnosed with terminal mesothelioma before age 45. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The second payment would be $260,000 for those diagnosed with cancer of the ovary prior to age 45.

The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the nature and severity of cancer, the individual’s age, previous talc use and other factors. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. For instance the case of a woman who used talc products on a weekly basis, who had the family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed stage II ovarian cancer when she was 55 may qualify for a $21,125 payout under the settlement plan.

Judge orders J&J, talc opponents to discuss settlement negotiations.

After another round of hearings in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the plan to enter into settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to hold the claims–the company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. While one firm representing plaintiffs agree with the offer, another group is opposed to the offer.

The previous week, the opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by argument that LTL is not a factor to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is an unjust and legally flawed attempt by a handful of law firms to try to stop claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. “The law firms that are behind the filing are pursuing financial interests which conflict with, contradict and contravene those of their clients. We’ll be submitting an answer before the court of appeals.”

Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who is home to more than mesothelioma victims who have filed lawsuits against J&J for bankruptcy, told J&J’s second bankruptcy effort will fail.

“J&J issue press releases describing how fantastic the plan is but simultaneously demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What is J&J’s plan to hide?”

Kaplan has commanded the parties to create a restructuring plan, with supervision and supervision of mediators.

In February 2022, Kaplan acknowledged J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free the company from the tens of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.

But in January of this year, an appeals court in the United States overturned the decision, ruling that the business could not be considered in “financial difficulty.”

When J&J’s attempt to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was denied the same month, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy just two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether to grant an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

With the 2 Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has gotten 19 months of which cases were placed suspended. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The company would like claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J would need 75% approval for the deal to go through.

In addition to the gang of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy and the U.S. Trustee, a branch belonging to the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting motions to dismiss the second bankruptcy case of LTL.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest, but naive debtors.” These doors “are not accessible to those that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to use bankruptcy to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

In its own words, J&J maintains there is no conclusive evidence that its talc products, including its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products from the market and will first launch them to be available in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the costly business of going to court. J&J has won the majority of the cases that were decided through trial, though some losses have been punitive.
A well-known trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company but was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine cases involving talc, which are on appeal or have been concluded. Of the 41 trials, 32 have ended in the favor of J&J, a mistrial or plaintiff verdict that was annulled in appeal. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. In addition, J&J has announced plans to settle nearly 1000 cases for $110 million. Bloomberg stated at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Settlement With Johnson & Johnson

Our lawyers handle baby powder cases in all 50 states. The talcum powder lawsuits on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including Shower to Shower Powder and Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page offers the J&J Talc Power litigation update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling will affect the final settlement amount in these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has passed to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us now at 800-553-2082 or get a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Settlement With Johnson & Johnson

June 2 2023 Update: In the asbestos talc case that took place in California yesterday, some technical issues interrupted the opening statement by the defense lawyers. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The jurors, attending from their homes via Zoom but did not hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express skepticism about the 70s science affirming the presence of asbestos in their product, but the session abruptly ended.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff had the opportunity to present its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals alongside talc is inevitable. He testified that his team informed J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc manufactured by the company, though with less than 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. First trial after J&J has decided to separate its talc segment and file for bankruptcy marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing talc lawsuit saga. Trial began yesterday in the harrowing case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, an illness that lawyers on both sides acknowledge is a tragedy of a different kind.

Opening statements laid bare huge differences between the sides’ narrative. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim at Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation process. The attorney claims that, according to, the company tried to manipulate the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from 1978 and 1994 showing that asbestos fibers found in tissue of the plaintiffs are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance as we progression of this trial. Despite the particularity of this mesothelioma-related case and its distinct issues compared to other talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could inflict an enormous setback for J&J’s hopes of broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit was able to defend it’s second Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of victims of talc injuries. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing was fundamentally different from the first filing. It also emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion to J&J the largest settlement ever made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. Not mentioned: how the amount of the settlement indicates that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed support from several plaintiffs’ legal firms representing more than 60,000 claimants. It is difficult to confirm but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: Following Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the first trial on the cosmetic talc products it claims to comprised of asbestos is set to start jury selection Monday, May 24, California with Alameda County Superior Court, an historically reliable jurisdiction for plaintiffs. Plaintiff claims that mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure from J&J’s products and the company does not deny. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently battling over who should be chosen to fill the post of future claims representative. This is a role that is critically essential to the resolution of the claim for talc. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to that role in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are protesting due to the fact that Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest that would prevent her from being appointed to that post in the future. The dispute stems from possibility that Ellis was apparently involved in the drafting of the highly disputable second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her capability to remain neutral. In reality, this bankruptcy could be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J formed to settle the talc litigation bankruptcy disclosed to the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have allocated $400 million to settle claims brought by states accusing the company of misleading advertising regarding its talc products. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It’s difficult to envision the scenario in which J&J can get these settlements for babies with these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer may seem like a huge sum at first, it does not look good when you do the math. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations would not pay victims much more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. It’s not enough.

May 15th 2023 Update J&J is potentially facing a lawsuit from an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The group claims J&J intentionally canceled a $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims that this move could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of rights of victims’ compensation. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions following of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: During the next week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. In the meantime, however, this bankruptcy court has issued an Order calling for both parties to participate in a new settlement negotiation to see if the global settlement can be been reached.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm and the company was paying $1 million per month for legal defense. The company’s most recent $29 million verdict that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for equitable distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being confiscated in the hands of the receiver. Other suppliers of talc have been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of litigation.

May 4 2023 Update U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks on settlement with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s proposed $8.9 billion agreement. At Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared in court to discuss next steps to take in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan has pushed for further settlement talks.

This is the answer to settle these claims with J&J. A baby powder settlement can get done. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. But it will require more money – billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether to take the proposal or not and not all clients see this issue the same way their attorney does. The second bankruptcy case is expected to fail as Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to decide whether to close the case for the third time.

May 3 2023 Update: A group representing cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked for J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail litigation over talc products. The group representing the claimants submitted a motion on Tuesday requesting the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case before a court of lower jurisdiction, with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. They also asked that the lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J continue to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered a $8.9 billion settlement. The committee believes that the recent ruling allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J should be subject to an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that it be requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a formal response in the appeals court saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally inadequate effort” by a handful of law firms with conflicts of financial interests.
May 1st 2023 Update: A frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their attorneys turn on $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s a lot of money. However, there are lots of victims. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. And these are really good arguments for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently with two talc trials ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon ended in an award worth $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma-related talc case went to hearing at South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29 million on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. one of the most prominent manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30, 2023 Update: When J&J first tried to bring the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. It was a ridiculously small amount. The talc plaintiffs had not supported it. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they will allow a bankruptcy settlement and also has the support of a substantial part of the talc-related plaintiffs and their attorneys. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. But with 75% of plaintiffs in the talc category, which is necessary for bankruptcy plan approval is not an easy task because of the number of lawyers who have vast stocks of baby powder litigations opposed to the settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023, Update Talc cancer claimants have requested a judge to dismiss their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, which claims that the business is not financially strained. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying LTL was not a candidate to receive bankruptcy relief because it failed to show financial stress.

The claimants contend that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system, and that it is being pursued in bad faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant backing” from firms representing approximately 60,000 plaintiffs. It’s fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims ‘ lawyers are divided on this $8.9 billion deal.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge has decided that Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits claiming that the company sold a baby powder that contained a chemical that causes cancer. Although trials for talc lawsuits are paused for a minimum of 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s attempt to revive its strategy with another bankruptcy case.

April 13, 2023 Update: The major story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years offer for settlement. Lawyers representing cancer victims in MDL class action MDL group action promised to fight the settlement alongside the talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough to pay for 70,000 victims who have cancer. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a bigger settlement or litigate individual claims if the most recent bankruptcy is dismissed.

But there is another lawyer group that isn’t part of the leadership group in group action. These lawyers have collectively amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle in what many believe to be less than the victims deserve. The argument they make is twofold. They argue that the settlement, which is about an average of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to present. But their second argument has more force: victims should not afford to wait any longer and need their money now.

April 12 2023 Update: People are looking for ways J&J is able to file for bankruptcy once more. The answer is complicated and complex. Let’s try to simplify it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to address both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. It thinks it can get a lower rate if there is a bankruptcy element that creates pressure to negotiate a settlement. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. In a quest to cover hundreds of years of American history, the company argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties as it distributes settlement payments more evenly and effectively than trial courts where some litigants receive significant payouts, while others are left with nothing.

The basic tenet of the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – the profit-making company that has subsidiaries to meet the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy – Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was in financial distress due to the fact that J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Then J&J decided to go with the unlimited funding part of the contract but did not pledge to provide unlimited funding for litigation. The company says that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary address appeals court’s concerns while still providing funds for claims. In the hope that offering victims less money would solve the overall issue.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who oppose the agreement counter this by arguing that the plaintiff is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier ruling. The hyperbole wasn’t spared by the victims’ lawyers, who call it the largest “fraudulent deal of assets in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really believe this bankruptcy will be able to last. It is however a method to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement, and to keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg has an interesting report on a brand new law within New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the baby powder class action lawsuit. Funders of litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) regarding talc products, in exchange for a share of any profits. J&J is now offering that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is publicly available because of an New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rule aims to respond to the increasing calls for the regulation of litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you take into account state and federal child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party funding for mass tort lawsuits is not without its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are witnessing how third-party financing can help level the playing field between people as well as large corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J has taken another blow this week when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court. The automatic stay has stopped thousands of talcum powder cases and prevented new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J initiated the controversial effort to spin talc-related liabilities into a bankrupt entity over a year in the past. Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid only a few months back, the stay was removed. J&J wanted to see it remain in effect until the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that of the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16th 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were included in the MDL over the last month, bringing the total number of cases pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation into the amount J&J product containing talc has cost the government in the years.
In a recent letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc products over long while tax dollars spent treating those injured by exposure to the products. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Settlement with Johnson & Johnson. J&J must begin making fair settlement offers to victims to in putting this behind it. This is a blemish on one of the world’s greatest companies.

February 14 2023 Update: At the hearing held today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.