You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc bad for you. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will pay $400 million to US state AGs. Talc Bad For You .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion deal to settle allegations that it’s Baby Powder as well as other talc ingredients cause cancer. Talc bad for you.

J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm will pay various types of cancer victims in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Talc bad for you. J&J has said that its Talc products are safe, and do not cause cancer. It’s trying for the second time to end more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy and stop new cases from being filed in the near future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims brought in state courts by attorneys general claiming that J&J was in violation of laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York as well as consumer protection laws by misinforming consumers about the safety of its talc products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection cases against J&J prior to the first bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from taking place in 2021. Talc bad for you. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched actions in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands in LTL’s court documents.

New Mexico and Mississippi have moved to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims as well as the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. argue that a profit-making firm like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections designed for struggling debtors.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the lawsuits in bankruptcy was dismissed after similar arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court decided that LTL did not have “financial distress” and was not eligible of bankruptcy protection. Talc bad for you. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again just over two hours after the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different because it had less money available and more support for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s new bankruptcy violates state law enforcement authorities by trying to unilaterally cap LTL’s liability to state consumer protection actions.

Talc Bad For You

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained more information about the way in which the company will evaluate and pay cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The largest amount of money under the settlement would be $500,000 for those diagnosed with terminal mesothelioma before age 45 and $260,000 for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that is terminal before age 45.

The proposed settlement applies discounts depending on the severity and type of cancer, an individual’s age, history of usage of talc and other variables. Talc bad for you. For instance an individual who was using daily talc products, had a family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed Stage II cancer of the ovary when she was 55 may be eligible for a $21,125 payment under the plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc oppositionists to take part in settlement talks.

After another round of hearings in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to use a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy for talc litigation and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the strategy to engage in negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy bid for LTL Management–a subsidiary established by J&J to manage the claims company offered a settlement of $8.9 billion. Talc bad for you. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the proposal, another group opposes the move.

In the last week, an opposition group, which is known as the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition by argument that LTL cannot be regarded as in financial distress.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a small number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution, which the vast majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talc bad for you. “The law firms who filed the filing are pursuing financial interests which are in conflict with, differ from and oppose the interests they represent. We’ll be submitting a response to the appellate court.”

Talc bad for you. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which has more than 80 patients with mesothelioma who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J failed.

“J&J issues press releases describing how fantastic its plan is, while demanding that plan details–including what each sick person will receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in the statement. “What do they have to cover up?”

Blog Talc JPML

Kaplan has commanded the parties to develop a new restructuring plan, with the oversight of two mediators.

As of February 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release J&J from the thousands of lawsuits concerning its talcum products.

However, in the month of January, a federal appeals court overturned the decision, ruling that the company could not be considered in “financial financial distress.”

After J&J’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was denied the same month, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy just two hours later. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 calendar days to decide whether to allow an additional bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit machine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

Through two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which the cases were on hold. Talc bad for you. The company would like claimants to take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J will require 75% approval for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the group of talc attorneys who have panned the company’s bankruptcy, the U.S. Trustee, a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice was also the one to file a motion to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a statement this week, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” The doors “are not available to anyone that lack a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its Talc products, which includes the famous baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market first to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.

J&J intends to steer clear of the cost of going to trial. It has won the majority of cases decided through trial, though certain losses have been severe.
A well-known trial in Missouri ended in an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company and was later lowered to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are appealing or decided. Out of 41 trials, 32 have ended in the favor of J&J, a mistrial or verdict of a plaintiff overturned in appeal. Talc bad for you. The company also in 2020 negotiated to settle over 1,000 cases worth $110 million. Bloomberg announced at that time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Bad For You

Our lawyers handle baby powder cases in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been in the process for several years. Talc bad for you. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in many products, including Baby Powder along with Shower to Shower as well as other products, may cause ovarian cancer among some women.

This page provides the J&J Talc Power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling will impact the final settlement amount in the Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Is the deadline for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who believe the statute of limitations has run out to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Bad For You

June 2 2023 Update: During an asbestos talc court trial held in California yesterday, some technical glitches interrupted the opening statements made by defense attorneys. Talc bad for you. The jurors, attending from home on Zoom and hearing the Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing skepticism about the 70s science claiming asbestos was present in their product prior to the proceedings abruptly ended.

The plaintiff was able to present their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of additional minerals along with talc is expected. He also testified that his team was notified by J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the company’s talc, albeit with lower than 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Talc bad for you. A trial for the first time since J&J has decided to separate its talc division and declare bankruptcy marks an important turning point for the ongoing lawsuit saga. The trial began on Tuesday in the tragic case of a young 24 year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma in the past year, which lawyers on both sides agree is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements revealed the sharp differences in the two sides’ narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging that the company employed deceitful strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation process. As per the lawyer the company attempted to manipulate the definition of asbestos despite internal documents from 1998 and 1994 that show fibers discovered in the tissues of the plaintiff are part of.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement offer hangs in the balance with the progression of this trial. Despite the unique nature of the mesothelioma trial and its distinct issues compared to other talcum powder lawsuits A verdict in favor of the plaintiff could be a serious setback to J&J’s hope of gaining broad acceptance for their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has strongly defended it’s 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the opposition of victims of talc injuries. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the situation was distinct from the first filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment of $8.9 billion from J&J which is the biggest settlement ever to be made in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Talc bad for you. There was no mention of how the magnitude of the settlement implies that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law firms representing more than the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is hard to verify but likely incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the very first trial involving its cosmetic talc products that are believed to with asbestos content is scheduled to start jury selection Monday, California within the Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma resulted from asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation that the company has denied. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently fighting over who should be appointed to the role of the future claims representative, the role is crucially critical to resolving claims involving talc. Talc bad for you. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs across the country was appointed the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be named to the position yet again, but the lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing due to the fact that Ellis has a conflict of interest that would prevent her from assuming that position in the future. The dispute stems from fact that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the controversially contested second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her capacity to be neutral. However, the reality is that this bankruptcy could be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company J&J put together for the talc bankruptcy has informed a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to pay the claims of states that accuse the company of deceptive advertising for its talc-based products. Talc bad for you. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It’s difficult to imagine the scenario in which J&J will be able to push these baby powder settlements through in these figures. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a lot initially, it does not look great when you consider the math. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations would not provide victims with much more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. That’s not enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update J&J could be facing suit from an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Talc bad for you. The group claims J&J intentionally canceled the $61.5 billion financing agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and to validate the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group claims this decision could be interpreted as a fraudulent transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions following of the dismissal of LTL’s first bankruptcy suit.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week in this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a petition to dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed that was filed by J&J company LTL Management. In the meantime, however, the bankruptcy has issued an order calling for both parties to take part in a new settlement negotiation in the hope that an international settlement agreement can be been reached.

May 5, 2023 Update: The talc manufacturer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging its talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Talc bad for you. Over 2,700 individuals have sued the firm, and it was spending $1 million a month to defend its legal position. The company’s latest $29 million settlement in South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue that assets should be distributed in an equitable manner among talc claimants instead of being taken over through the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of lawsuits.

May 4 2023 Update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to relaunch talks on settlement with lawyers who rejected the company’s $8.9 billion offer for settlement. The court in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps for their second bankruptcy matter. Judge Kaplan pushed more settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. The baby powder settlement is likely to be made. Talc bad for you. However, it will require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars of Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether to take the proposal or not and not every client views this issue the same way their attorney does. Second bankruptcy cases are destined to fail, and Judge Kaplan has set a date for a hearing in June to decide whether to close the case for the third time.

May 3 2023 Update The group of cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked for J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt the litigation involving talc products. The group representing the claimants has filed a motion this week asking to the Third Circuit to consider their appeal and return the case an earlier court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Talc bad for you. They also asked that stoppage of tort litigation against J&J allow the litigation to proceed.
LTL requested Chapter 11 protection once again following the bankruptcy filing it made earlier was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered the possibility of an $8.9 billion deal. The committee argues that the recent ruling, which allows LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J, warrants an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that be the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a reply to the appeals court saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally inadequate attempt” by a handful of law firms that have different financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: One question people keep asking is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn on $8.9 billion. Of course, that is a lot of money. But there are a lot of victims. Talc bad for you. These are an excellent cases for plaintiffs. We were reminded recently when two talc cases ended in large verdicts for plaintiffs. In February the mesothelioma case involving talcum powder trial in Oregon was settled with the verdict worth $18.1 million. A month later, another talc mesothelioma case went to trial on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in the verdict of $29 million to the plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the most prominent manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: J&J initially attempted to pull the talcum powder lawsuit into bankruptcy, they came with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. The amount was absurdly low. There was no one among the talc victims who agreed with the offer. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they will allow a bankruptcy settlement and they have the backing of a significant segment of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Talc bad for you. However, 75% of plaintiffs of talc are necessary for bankruptcy plan approval, it a tough road because of the number of lawyers who have vast inventory of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed against the proposed settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023, Update Talc plaintiffs have demanded a judge disqualify the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially distressed. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby powders cause cancer. Talc bad for you. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying the company was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial difficulties.

The claimants contend that the 2nd Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being pursued in bad faith. J&J claims the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from companies representing about 60,000 potential plaintiffs. It’s fair to say that plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion deal.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. While trials in the lawsuits involving talc are delayed for a minimum period of 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Talc bad for you. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy with a second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 update: the most important news is the $8.9 billion over 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer patients within MDL class action MDL group action vowed to fight the settlement alongside those who claim talc. Why? They feel it’s not enough money for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Talc bad for you. These lawyers believe that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or litigate individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

But there’s a separate set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership of that class action. These lawyers have amassed hundreds of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle now for what many argue is lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument is two-fold. The first is that they claim the settlement of around 100,000 dollars per plaintiff is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to make. However, their second argument has more teeth: victims can not afford to wait any longer and need the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are wondering if J&J can file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and convoluted. Let’s try to simplify it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to deal with both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. Also, it believes it can pay less when there is an element of bankruptcy that puts pressure to settle. Talc bad for you. In a quest to cover more than 400 years in American history, the firm argues that bankruptcy benefits everyone by dispersing settlements more fairly and efficiently than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant award while others do not.

The main thrust of the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – the profit-making company that has subsidiaries to meet the legal risk and declare bankruptcy Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated the company was in financial trouble because J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Then J&J did not hesitate to take advantage of the funding unlimited part of the deal and didn’t make any promises to offer unlimited funding for cases. The company claims that modified financing arrangements with its subsidiary will address appeals court’s concerns, while supplying funds for claim payments. It’s as if giving victims less money would solve the underlying issue.

Lawyers representing cancer victims who are against the agreement argue this by arguing that the plaintiff is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier ruling. Hyperbole is not exempt: victims’ lawyers call it the largest “fraudulent transaction ever in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. However, it’s a means to try and push the $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 update: Bloomberg provides an insightful article about a new law in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the class action lawsuit. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of winnings. J&J has now offered that it will pay $8.9 billion to settle lawsuits.

The involvement of funders is public information due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about outside funding backers. The rules aim to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of the litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you take into account state and federal baby powder lawsuits. Third-party funding in mass tort claims is not without its pros and cons. But there is no question that we are seeing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individuals and big corporations in court.

April 4 2023 Update: It is pleasing to see the worm turn in this lawsuit. J&J was hit again this week when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to continue the automatic stay while J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. The automatic stay has frozen thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped new lawsuits from being filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liability into a bankrupt entity over a year earlier. Talc bad for you. After it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient some months ago, the stay was revoked. J&J had hoped to have it continued pending hearing the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. There is a chance that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to take up the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay having been in effect, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the Talcum Powder class action MDL in the space of a year. Seven new talc lawsuits were brought into the MDL over the last month which brings the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for authorities from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) start an investigation into the amount J&J talc products have cost the government in the many years.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of ignoring the dangers of its talc product for decades while tax dollars were used to treat those who were injured through exposure to the chemicals. The demand comes just weeks following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc bad for you. J&J has to begin making reasonable settlement proposals to victims to getting this behind. This is a blemish on one of the most prestigious companies.

February 14 2023 Update: During an appearance today in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.