You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc lawsuit mistrial. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement for talc would pay the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Talc Lawsuit Mistrial .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to resolve U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a wider $8.9 billion plan to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc-based ingredients cause cancer. Talc lawsuit mistrial.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that outlines how the firm plans to pay different kinds of cancer victims as part of bankruptcy settlement. Talc lawsuit mistrial. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe, and won’t cause cancer. It is attempting for a second time to resolve more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from coming forward in the near future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan would pay $400 million into a separate trust for claims filed by state attorneys general alleging that J&J did not comply with laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York as well as consumer protection laws by misleading consumers about the dangers of its talc products.

Many states had initiated consumer protection cases against J&J prior to LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped those investigations from taking place in 2021. Talc lawsuit mistrial. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated actions in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative demands or subpoenas, according to LTL’s court papers.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy, joining cancer victims as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They argue that a profit-making firm like J&J can’t benefit from bankruptcy protections designed for those struggling with debt.
The company’s initial attempt to resolve the bankruptcy lawsuits was rejected after the same arguments. The U.S. appeals court ruled that LTL wasn’t in “financial trouble” and was not eligible for bankruptcy protection. Talc lawsuit mistrial. LTL declared bankruptcy a second time less than two hours after that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different because there was less money available and more backing for a settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of state law enforcement authorities in attempting to unilaterally limit LTL’s liability to state consumer protection measures.

Talc Lawsuit Mistrial

LTL’s filings for the new year also contained more information on how the company would assess and settle cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement would be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45, and $260,000 for those diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement provides discounts based on the severity and type of cancer, an individual’s age, the history of talc use and other factors. Talc lawsuit mistrial. For example, a woman who used talc products on a weekly basis, who had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed stage II ovarian cancer at age 55 may qualify to receive a payment of $21,125 under the plan.

Judge ordains J&J and talc opponents engage in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s effort to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposing the move to conduct talks to reach a settlement, Bloomberg reports.

With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to hold the claims–the company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Talc lawsuit mistrial. While a group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the settlement, a different group opposes the move.

This week, the opposition group, which is known as”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants requested the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition argument that LTL is not a factor to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is a desperate and legally deficient attempt by a small number of law firms to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants approve of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talc lawsuit mistrial. “The law firms who filed the filing are pursuing financial interests which clash with, differ from and infringe on the rights of their clients. We’ll be submitting an answer in the appeals court.”

Talc lawsuit mistrial. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM who includes more than mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J, said that the company’s second bankruptcy try will fail.

“J&J issue press releases about how wonderful the plan is but simultaneously requesting that details of the plan, such as what each sick person will receive — be kept private,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What do they have to keep secret?”

4L 4

Kaplan has directed the parties to devise a second arrangement plan under the supervision and supervision of mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan affirmed the ability of J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free J&J from the hundreds of thousands of claims over its talcum products.

However, in January of this year an appeals court of the federal government overturned the decision, ruling that the company was not able to be considered in “financial financial distress.”

After J&J’s make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was turned down the same month, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days in order to determine whether to grant to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s omnipotent profit engine fails after $6.9B talc litigation charge.

In the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has been able to buy 19 months in which cases have been in limbo. Talc lawsuit mistrial. The company wants claimants to take a vote to accept their settlement. J&J would need 75% acceptance for the deal to go through.

In addition to the gang of talc attorneys who have panned LTL’s bankruptcy plan and the U.S. Trustee which is a division from the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting an appeal to dismiss LTL’s bankruptcy second case.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” Those doors “are not open to parties that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy reason or want to use the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

On the other hand, J&J maintains there is no evidence conclusive that its Talc products, which includes its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market, first on North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J seeks to avoid the cost of going to trial. The company has won the majority of cases that have been resolved during trial, however, certain losses have been harsh.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri resulted in a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company that was later reduced to $2.1 billion after appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are being appealed or resolved. Out of 41 trials 32 have ended in an outcome for J&J, a mistrial or plaintiff verdict that was annulled in appeal. Talc lawsuit mistrial. Separately, the company in 2020 negotiated to settle nearly 1,000 cases worth 100 million dollars, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Lawsuit Mistrial

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in every state. The talcum powder lawsuits for Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. Talc lawsuit mistrial. The lawsuits allege that prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as baby Powder and Shower to Shower, can cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page gives the J&J Talc Power Update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling affects the final settlement amount of the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to make a claim for talcum powder? Many who assume the statute of limitations has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us today at 800-553-8082 or request a free and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Lawsuit Mistrial

June 2, 2023 Update: During an asbestos talc court trial held which took place in California yesterday, a few technical issues disrupted the opening statements made by defense lawyers. Talc lawsuit mistrial. Jurors who were watching from home on Zoom however, heard Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express doubt about the 70s research asserting the presence of asbestos in their product, but the proceedings abruptly ended.

Meanwhile, the plaintiff could present an initial witness Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of additional minerals along with talc is inevitable. He said that his team advised J&J in the year 1971 of the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc manufactured by the company, though in less than 0.1 percent. He also uncovered more asbestos in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update Talc lawsuit mistrial. This is the first court trial that has taken place since J&J decided to spin off its talc segment and file for bankruptcy marks an important point in the ongoing talc lawsuit drama. Trial began yesterday in the poignant trial of a young plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year, which both sides of the argument agree is a tragic loss.

Opening statements revealed the stark differences in each side’s story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading methods in their research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson tried to alter the definition of asbestos, despite internal documents dating back to the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s precarious $8.9 billion settlement proposal hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its unique challenges compared to most talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could result in an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their proposed settlement with plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023: Update from Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc division was able to defend it’s Second Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from talc injury claimants. In an opposition filed with the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the situation was fundamentally different from the prior filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment of $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J as the largest settlement ever in an bankruptcy case involving mass torts. Talc lawsuit mistrial. The issue is not discussed: whether the magnitude of the settlement implies that it is an equitable settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over 60,000 claimants. This is hard to verify but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: In the wake of Johnson & Johnson’s 2021 bankruptcy filing, the first trial on its cosmetic talc products allegedly containing asbestos is set to start jury selection Monday, California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good jurisdiction for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure from J&J’s products which the company has denied. The trial also involves six retailers accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are currently disputing who should be appointed to the position of the future claims representative, an important role critical to resolving Talc claims. Talc lawsuit mistrial. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs across the country, was appointed as the claims representative in the previous bankruptcy. J&J’s defense attorneys want Ellis to be appointed to this position in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are protesting on the grounds that Ellis has conflicts of interest that would prevent her from taking on that role for the second time. The conflict stems from the possibility that Ellis was believed to have been involved in the drafting of the highly disputable second bankruptcy, raising doubts regarding her capacity to remain neutral. However, the reality is that this bankruptcy will likely to be dismissed in the end.

May 17, 2023 Update: The pretend company that J&J created for the talc litigation bankruptcy told a New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to settle claims of states that accuse the company of misleading advertising for its talc-based products. Talc lawsuit mistrial. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where J&J can get the settlements of baby powder through at these numbers. While J&J’s proposed $8.5 billion offer sounds like a large sum initially, it will not appear appealing when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our rough calculations would not be able to pay victims more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. It’s not enough.

May 15th, 2023, Update J&J could be facing lawsuit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Talc lawsuit mistrial. The group argues that J&J intentionally withdrew an $61.5 billion funding agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to create the appearance of financial hardship and confirm the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action is a fraud transfer of rights of compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions as a result of the dismissal of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: Next week this week, it is expected that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy petition filed of J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. However, in the meantime the bankruptcy has issued an order requiring both sides to participate in a settlement mediation in the hope that a global settlement deal can reached.

May 5 2023 Update: Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products caused cancer through asbestos exposure. Talc lawsuit mistrial. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the company and it has been spending $1 million a month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million settlement in South Carolina forced it to file for bankruptcy protection, arguing for a fair distribution of assets to talc claimants, rather than being taken over in the hands of the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also filed for bankruptcy due to legal proceedings.

May 4 2023 Update: U.S. Court of Bankruptcy Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen settlement discussions with lawyers who rejected Johnson & Johnson’s $8.9 billion settlement offer. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday, the parties appeared before a judge to discuss next steps for the second bankruptcy case. Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the way to settle these claims for J&J. A settlement for baby powder can get done. Talc lawsuit mistrial. However, it will require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars – coming from Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are split on whether or not to agree with the proposal and not every client sees the issue in the same manner their lawyer views it. This second case of bankruptcy is likely to fail, and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide if he will close the case for the third time.

May 3 2023 Update: A group of cancer patients suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked for J&J’s Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail litigation regarding talc-related products. The group of talc claimants made a motion Tuesday asking that the Third Circuit to consider their case and send it back the lower court, with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Talc lawsuit mistrial. They also asked that stopped tort litigation against J&J continue to continue.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was rejected by the Third Circuit earlier this year with the possibility of an $8.9 billion payment. The committee says that the recent decision allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, and also stopping trials against J&J is a reason for the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee has also requested it be requested that the New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that J&J intends to file a statement in the appeals court, saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally deficient effort” by a handful of law firms with conflicting financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A most frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn on $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s a lot of money. But there are plenty of victims. Talc lawsuit mistrial. These are actually a good arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently in two talc trials which have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February, a talcum powder mesothelioma trial in Oregon was settled with a verdict in the amount of $18.1 million. The following month, a second mesothelioma trial involving talc was held for hearing within South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million on behalf of the plaintiff. In both instances, the defendant was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc., one of the top suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, it did so with an offer to put aside $2 billion for settlements. It was a ridiculously small amount. None of the talc plaintiffs agreed with it. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs are willing to accept bankruptcy settlements and they have the support of a large section of the talc victims and their attorneys. Talc lawsuit mistrial. But with 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans, it a tough road since there are so many lawyers with vast stocks of baby powder lawsuits opposed to the settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 update: Talc cancer claimants have sought a court order to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a ridiculously made-up Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially strained. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Talc lawsuit mistrial. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company wasn’t eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it failed to show financial distress.

The claimants argue that LTL’s Second Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system and that the case is being handled in bad good faith. J&J says the bankruptcy settlement is backed by “significant support” from the firms that represent around 60,000 people who are claiming. It is fair to say plaintiffs’ lawyers and victims are divided over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge decided the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the firm sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. Although trials for Talc lawsuits are suspended for a minimum of 60 days, new lawsuits can be filed and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Talc lawsuit mistrial. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s attempt to revive its strategy by filing a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13 2023 Update: The big story is that there’s an $8.9 billion over 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients involved in MDL class action MDL group action pledged to fight the settlement along with Talc claimants. Why? They think it is too little money for the more than 70,000 cancer victims. Talc lawsuit mistrial. These lawyers believe that J&J should seek a bigger settlement or settle individuals’ claims if the current bankruptcy is thrown out.

There is a different set of lawyers who are not part of the leadership group in the class action. They have amassed tens of thousands of cases. This group wants to settle today with what they believe is less than the victims deserve. Their argument appears to be two-fold. First, they argue the settlement – about 100,000 dollars per plaintiff – is fair.

That is a hard argument to argue. But their second argument has more teeth: victims can be no longer patient and demand the money immediately.

April 12 2023 Update: Many are asking how J&J can go through bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and convoluted. But let’s try to explain it clearly.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only means to address both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. In other words, it thinks it will pay less if there is the bankruptcy element which applies pressure to settle. Talc lawsuit mistrial. Driving past hundreds of years of American past, the company believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to all parties because it distributes settlements more equally and effectively than trial courts, in which some litigants receive substantial award while others do not.

The basic tenet in the 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – an enterprise that is profitable, forming an affiliate to accept the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy, which is what Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. But it also said the company was financially distress due to the fact that J&J assured it of unlimited funding.
Thus, J&J took advantage of the unlimited funding portion of the holding and didn’t make any promises that it would provide unlimited funds for lawsuits. The company claims that revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary address concerns of the appeals court while offering funds to pay claims. It’s as if giving victims lower amounts of money would resolve the problem at hand.

Attorneys representing cancer victims who oppose the deal counter this argument by saying that it is the legal argument. Talc lawsuit mistrial. They counter with legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets away from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s previous ruling. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed the lawyers representing victims call it the most significant “fraudulent transfer that has occurred in United States history.”

Notwithstanding the legal mumbo jumbo, J&J does not really think this bankruptcy will survive. But it is a way of pushing this $8.9 billion settlement and keep pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10, 2023 Update: Bloomberg offers an informative piece on a law that has been passed of New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the plaintiffs in the class action. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits in the case of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a share of any settlements. J&J is now offering to pay $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The funders’ involvement is made public due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rule aims to tackle the growing demands for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has to deal with more than 60,000 lawsuits when you include state and federal infant powder litigation. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are seeing how third-party funding can level the playing field for individuals and big corporations in the courtroom.

April 4 2023 Update: It is fun to watch the worm turning in this legal battle. J&J suffered another setback this week, when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to keep the automatic stay in place while J&J appeals a bankruptcy decision at the U.S. Supreme Court. It has frozen thousands of talcum powder cases and stopped any new lawsuits from arising ever since J&J launched the controversial attempt to spin the talc liability off into a bankrupt subsidiary more than one year in the past. Talc lawsuit mistrial. After the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was insufficient a few months ago, the stay was revoked. J&J was hoping to have it continued pending its SCOTUS appeal. But, no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that for the Supreme Court is willing even to hear the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: With the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the very first new cases were filed and incorporated into the Talcum Powder class action MDL in over one year. Seven new talc cases were brought into the MDL during the month of March increasing the number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) begin an investigation into how much J&J talc products have cost the government over the many years.
In a recent letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc products for decades while tax dollars were spent on treating people who suffered injuries from exposure to the chemicals. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc lawsuit mistrial. J&J should begin to make reasonable settlement proposals for victims in order getting this behind. It is a stain on one of the top companies.

February 14 2023 Update: At an earlier hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention in light of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.