You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc legal case. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed talc settlement will make payments of the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Talc Legal Case .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its wider $8.9 billion effort to settle claims that its Baby Powder and other talc-based ingredients cause cancer. Talc legal case.

J&J subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company will pay various types of cancer victims in bankruptcy settlement. Talc legal case. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe and will not cause cancer. The company is trying for an additional time to conclude more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy and stop new cases from being filed in the future.
LTL’s bankruptcy plan will pay $400 million to a separate trust for lawsuits filed with state attorneys general alleging that J&J violated the state’s unfair commercial practices as well as consumer protection laws through misleading consumers about the security of its talc-based products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection measures against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing prevented these investigations from proceeding in 2021. Talc legal case. New Mexico and Mississippi had already initiated actions against Johnson & Johnson before then and the states of Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative subpoenas or demands, according to LTL’s court documents.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims as well as their counterparts from the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog, who have argued that a profitable firm like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for the struggling debtors.
The first time LTL attempted to settle the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was dismissed following similar arguments. A U.S. appeals court determined that LTL was not in “financial difficulty” and ineligible of bankruptcy protection. Talc legal case. LTL had filed for bankruptcy again just over two hours after the decision to dismiss, arguing that its second attempt was different because it had less money available and more support for the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of the law enforcement powers of the state by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company in state consumer protection actions.

Talc Legal Case

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include additional details about how the company would assess and pay cancer claims in the event that the bankruptcy plan is approved.

The maximum amount under the settlement will be $500,000 for those diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45, and $260,000 for those who have been diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer before age 45.

From there, the proposed settlement offers discounts based on the type and severity of the cancer, the person’s age, the history of using talc and other factors. Talc legal case. For example an individual who was using talc products weekly, had a family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with the stage 2 ovarian cancer at the age of 55 might qualify to receive a payment of $21,125 according to the plan.

Judge decides J&J and talc oppositionists to take part in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the firm and the people who opposed the move to conduct negotiations to settle the matter, Bloomberg reports.

In its second bankruptcy effort for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to handle the claims company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Talc legal case. While one firm representing plaintiffs agree with the offer, another group is against the settlement.

The previous week, the opposition group, which is known as”The Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by saying that LTL is not considered to be in financial hardship.

“The filing is an incredibly legal and ineffective attempt by a few of law firms to try to block claimants from voting on the resolution plan, a plan the vast majority of claimants support,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in an announcement. Talc legal case. “The law firms involved in these filings have interests in finance that do not align with, diverge from and infringe on the rights of their clients. We will be submitting an appeal before the court of appeals.”

Talc legal case. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which has more than 80 mesothelioma clients who have filed lawsuits against J&J claimed that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort failed.

“J&J issue press releases that boast about how amazing its plan is while simultaneously insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment individual sick people would actually be treated to,” Thompson said in the statement. “What is J&J’s plan to hide?”

Talcum Powder Bottle

Kaplan has commanded the parties to create a arrangement plan under supervision of two mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan confirmed J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would release J&J from the thousands of lawsuits regarding its talcum products.

In January of this year, an appeals court of the federal government overturned the decision, ruling that the business could not be considered to be in “financial distress.”

When J&J’s attempt to make an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court was turned down in April, J&J applied for its first bankruptcy about two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days in order to determine whether or not to accept to file for bankruptcy again.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine sputters after $6.9B the talc litigation cost.

With the Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases were put held. Talc legal case. The company would like claimants to accept their settlement. J&J needs 75% of the vote for the deal to go through.

Alongside the group of talc lawyers that criticized the company’s bankruptcy play and the U.S. Trustee which is a division that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice, also filed motions to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy case.

In a letter filed this week, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the doors of bankruptcy courts are “open to honest but unfortunate debtors.” These doors “are not open to any parties that don’t have a legitimate bankruptcy purpose or that seek to use the bankruptcy process to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.

To its credit, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its talc products, including its popular baby powder cause cancer. J&J has adopted the products of the market first to be available in North America in 2020–and the remainder of the globe later this year.

J&J is determined to stay clear of the cost of going to trial. It has won the majority of the cases that have been resolved through trial, though some losses have been punishing.
A highly-publicized trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drugmaker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are in appeal or concluded. Out of 41 trials 32 of them ended in a win by J&J or a mistrial, or verdict for a plaintiff that was dismissed on appeal. Talc legal case. The company also in 2020 negotiated to settle nearly 1,000 cases worth $110 million. Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Legal Case

Our lawyers handle baby powder lawsuits in every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder for Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for years. Talc legal case. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient in products like baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower and Shower to Shower, could cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page gives an J&J talc power litigation update and explains how the forthcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amounts of these Ovarian Cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who assume the statute of limitations has run out to sue Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Contact us now at 800-553-8082 or get a no-cost, quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Legal Case

June 2 2023 Update: At the asbestos talc trial that took place in California yesterday, some technical issues interrupted the opening statements of the defense lawyers. Talc legal case. Jurors at home via Zoom, did hear Johnson and Johnson’s lawyer express skepticism about the 70s science claiming asbestos was present in their product prior to the opening was abruptly ended.

The plaintiff could introduce their first witness, Arthur Langer. Langer said that the presence of other minerals with the talc’s mineral content is inevitable. He testified that his team informed J&J in 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc produced by the company, although with just 0.1 percent. The asbestos was discovered by him in 1976.

June 1st, 2023 Update: Talc legal case. A trial for the first time since J&J decided to spin off its talc section and declaring bankruptcy marks an important turning point in the ongoing talc litigation story. The trial started yesterday in the heartbreaking case of a young 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an extremely rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year, which lawyers on both sides believe is a harrowing tragedy.

Opening statements revealed stark differences in each side’s narrative. The attorney for the plaintiff took aim on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading tactics in research practices and throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.

Johnson &J’s tangled $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance with the development of the trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its unique challenges compared to other lawsuits involving talcum powder and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could cause an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has vigorously defended its 2nd Chapter 11 filing in the facing challenges from talc injury claimants. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the situation was fundamentally different from the previous filing. It highlighted the extraordinary commitment of $8.9 billion in settlement from J&J the biggest settlement ever to be made in any bankruptcy case that involves mass tort. Talc legal case. The issue is not discussed: whether the size of the settlement means it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from a variety of plaintiffs’ law firms that represent over the 60,000 plaintiffs. This is not easy to confirm but it’s likely to be false.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy in 2021 filing, the very first trial concerning its cosmetic talc items allegedly that contain asbestos is scheduled to commence jury selection on Monday, California within the Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma is the result of asbestos exposure resulting from J&J’s products, an allegation the company does not deny. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-containing products.

May 22, 2023 Update: Lawyers in the 2nd J&J talc bankruptcy are battling over who should be appointed to the role of a future claims representative, a role that is critically essential to the resolution of the Talc claims. Talc legal case. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who regularly appears in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed as the claims representative in the initial bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team would like Ellis to be appointed in that position again, but lawyers for the plaintiffs in talc are arguing due to the fact that Ellis has an unrelated conflict of interest that would prevent her from holding that position in the future. The conflict stems from the reality that Ellis was apparently involved in the creation of the hotly disputable second bankruptcy, raising doubts about her capacity to be neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy will likely to be dismissed regardless.

May 17, 2023 Update The pretend company J&J created for the talc litigation bankruptcy told an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have set aside $400 million to settle claims of states that accuse J&J of misleading marketing regarding its talc products. Talc legal case. So that makes it an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where J&J can push the baby powder settlements given these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer might seem like a huge sum initially, it will not look good when you look at the numbers. The settlement plan based on our estimates – will not provide victims with much more than an average settlement $100,000 per case. This isn’t enough.

May 15th, 2023 Update J&J might be facing lawsuit from an advocacy group representing cancer victims. Talc legal case. The group contends that J&J deliberately retracted an $61.5 billion financing agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and verify the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action is equivalent to a fraudulent transfer of victims’ compensation rights. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the denial of the first bankruptcy case of LTL.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week, this week the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to reject the second bankruptcy filing from J&J company LTL Management. In the meantime, however LTL Management has filed an Order requiring both sides to take part in a settlement mediation hoping that a global settlement deal can reached.

May 5 2023: Update on Talc provider Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to numerous lawsuits alleging that its Talc products caused cancer from asbestos exposure. Talc legal case. Over 2,700 people have sued the firm and the company was spending $1 million a month on legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million settlement that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for a fair distribution of assets among talc claimants instead of being taken in the hands of the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of legal proceedings.

May 4, 2023 Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume talks on settlement with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s proposed $8.9 billion deal. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties gathered in court to discuss next steps for this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.

This is the answer to resolve the claims of J&J. A settlement for baby powder can get done. Talc legal case. But it’ll need more money – billions of dollars – by Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers have a split opinion on whether or not to accept the plan and not every client views the situation the same way their lawyer sees it. Second bankruptcy cases are bound to be a failure the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to determine if she will dismiss the bankruptcy for the second time.

May 3 2023 Update The group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested to have the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is a bid to stop litigation over talc products. The group representing claimants for talc made a motion Tuesday, asking to the Third Circuit to consider their case and then send it back to a lower court, with instructions for dismissing the bankruptcy. Talc legal case. They also asked that the lawsuit against the halted torts of J&J be allowed to proceed.
LTL has filed for Chapter 11 protection once again following its bankruptcy filing that was denied in the Third Circuit earlier this year which offered an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee says that the recent ruling which allowed LTL’s second Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J and J&J, requires the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J plans to file a response to the appeals court saying that the filing is an “desperate and legally insufficient effort” by a select group of law firms who have different financial interests.
May 1, 2023 Update: One question people keep asking is how plaintiffs and their lawyers turn off $8.9 billion. That’s of course quite a sum. But there are plenty of victims. Talc legal case. These are actually a good case for plaintiffs. We have been reminded of this recently in two talc trials which ended in large verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon was settled with an award that was $18.1 million. A month later, another mesothelioma-related talc case went to trial on the other side of South Carolina and resulted in an award of $29 million to the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. One of the top suppliers of talc in the U.S.
April 30th, 2023 Update: When J&J first attempted to drag the talcum powder litigation into bankruptcy, they came with the option of putting aside $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. All of the talc plaintiffs supported the proposal. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 If the talc plaintiffs will allow a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a large part of the talc-related plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Talc legal case. But with 75% of plaintiffs who are a talc, which is necessary for bankruptcy plan approval is a difficult road because of the number of lawyers who have vast inventory of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed against the proposed settlement.

What are the solutions to the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update: Talc patients have demanded a judge reject the Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially troubled. LTL applied for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby-powders caused cancer. Talc legal case. In the end, however, the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January, saying LTL was not a candidate for bankruptcy relief as it did not show financial difficulties.

The claimants assert that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an fraud on the bankruptcy system and the case is being handled in bad good faith. J&J asserts that the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant support” from firms representing around 60,000 claimants. It’s safe to say that lawyers representing plaintiffs and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over what they believe is an $8.9 billion amount of settlement offered.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge has ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that the company sold tainted baby powder causing cancer. While trials in Talc lawsuits are suspended for at least 60 days however, new lawsuits may be filed and lawyers can begin preparing their cases. Talc legal case. Judges expressed doubt about J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its plan with a second bankruptcy case.

April 13th 2023 Update: most important announcement is an $8.9 billion over the next 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer patients in the MDL collective action pledged to fight the settlement alongside the talc claimants. Why? They think it is not enough money for 70 000 cancer patients. Talc legal case. They argue that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or pursue individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.

There is a different lawyer group that isn’t part of the top leadership in group action. The lawyers collectively have accumulated hundreds of thousands of cases. This group wants to settle now for what is believed to be lower than what the victims should be paid. Their argument seems to be two-fold. They argue that the settlement – about 100,000 dollars per plaintiff is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to argue. However, their second argument has more substance: the victims will no longer wait and want to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: Some people are wondering if J&J can file for bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and complex. But let’s try to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to resolve both current and future talc litigations in a definitive manner. It believes that it will be less expensive when there is the bankruptcy element which applies pressure to settle. Talc legal case. In a quest to cover hundreds of years of American time, the business argues that bankruptcy benefits everyone by dispersing settlement payments more evenly and effectively than trial courts, where litigants are awarded significant awards while others receive nothing.

The main thrust of this 3rd Circuit decision was this isn’t a case that involves the profit-making company that has subsidiaries to meet the legal burden and declare bankruptcy Congress had in mind when it came to drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, the court also ruled that the entity was in financial crisis because J&J promised unlimited funding.
This is why J&J jumped on the unlimited funding portion of the contract but did not pledge that it would provide unlimited funds for the litigation. The company says that its new financing agreements with its subsidiary address appeals court’s concerns while still offering funds to pay claims. As if providing victims with lower amounts of money would resolve the overarching problem.

Lawyers representing cancer patients who oppose the agreement counter this argument by saying that it is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal absurdity: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier ruling. Hyperbole was not spared attorneys representing the victims claim it the biggest “fraudulent deal of assets in United States history.”

Despite all the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe this bankruptcy will be able to last. It is however a method of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain the pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg offers an informative piece on a law that has been passed that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the baby powder plaintiffs in the class action. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) over talc products in exchange in exchange for a portion of settlements. J&J has now offered to pay $8.9 billion to settle any lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is public information because of the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The rules aim to respond to the increasing calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you combine state and federal child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party funding of mass tort cases has both pros and pros and. There is no doubt that we are witnessing the ways that third-party funding can even the playing field between individuals and big companies in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s enjoyable to see the worm turn in this case. J&J suffered another setback this week when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to maintain the automatic stay as J&J appeals an order granting bankruptcy before the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay froze the cases of talcum powder in a number of years and prevented new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc debts off into a bankrupt company over a year earlier. Talc legal case. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal only a few months back, the stay was revoked. J&J was hoping to have it continued pending the SCOTUS appeal. The answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that is that the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay now officially lifted, the first new cases were filed and incorporated into the class action involving talcum powder MDL in just over a year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were included in the MDL in the last month increasing the number of pending cases up to 37,522.

February 25, 2023 Update: A Congressmen from Tennessee is now calling for the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation to determine how much J&J Talc products have cost the government over the years.
In a recent letter addressed to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) accused J&J of ignoring the risks of its talc product for years while tax dollars were spent treating those injured by exposure to the products. This lawsuit comes a few weeks after J&J’s significant loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc legal case. J&J must begin making fair settlement offers for victims in order in putting this behind it. This is a blemish on one of the most prestigious firms.

February 14 , 2023 Update: At an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.