You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Talc powder claims. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!

J&J’s proposed settlement with talc would provide the sum of $400 million US state AGs. Talc Powder Claims .

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has put aside $400 million to settle U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of a broad $8.9 billion plan to settle claims that its Baby Powder as well as other talc ingredients cause cancer. Talc powder claims.

J&J subsidiaries LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday that details how the company intends to pay different types of cancer victims in a bankruptcy settlement. Talc powder claims. J&J has stated that its products containing talc are safe and don’t cause cancer. It’s trying for another time to settle more than 38,000 lawsuits in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from coming forward in the near future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million to a separate trust for claims brought from state attorney generals alleging that J&J violated laws against unfair business practices in the State of New York and consumer protection laws through misleading consumers about the security of its talc-based products.

A number of states had already initiated consumer protection lawsuits against J&J prior to the time that LTL’s bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from taking place in 2021. Talc powder claims. New Mexico and Mississippi had already launched suits against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued subpoenas or civil investigative demands, according to LTL’s court filings.

New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy in a joint move with cancer victims and those affected by cancer and the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. have claimed that a lucrative company like J&J does not qualify for bankruptcy protections intended for the struggling debtors.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy cases was rejected after the same arguments. In the end, a U.S. appellate court decided the LTL did not have “financial financial distress” and ineligible of bankruptcy protection. Talc powder claims. LTL made a new bankruptcy application less than two hours after that dismissal, arguing that the second bankruptcy was different because it was able to borrow less and had more support for the settlement.

New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s latest bankruptcy violation of state law enforcement powers by trying to unilaterally cap the liability of the company for state consumer protection measures.

Talc Powder Claims

The filings of LTL’s latest bankruptcy proceedings also include additional details about the way in which the company will evaluate and pay cancer claims should the bankruptcy plan be approved.

The largest amount of money under the settlement will be $500,000 for people diagnosed with cancer of the mesothelioma ovary before age 45 and $260,000 for those diagnosed with cancer of the ovary before age 45.

The proposed settlement offers discounts based on the kind and severity of the cancer, the person’s age, history of usage of talc and other variables. Talc powder claims. For example an individual who was using daily talc products, had a family history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed with an ovarian cancer stage II when she was 55 may qualify to receive a payment of $21,125 under the program.

Judge orders J&J and talc opponents engage in settlement talks.

Following another hearing in Johnson and Johnson’s efforts to utilize a Texas Two-Step bankruptcy strategy to resolve talc litigation, federal bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company as well as those who oppose the plan to enter into settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.

The second time it attempted to file for bankruptcy for LTL management, a subsidiary founded by J&J to manage the claims company offered a settlement amounting to $8.9 billion. Talc powder claims. While a firm representing plaintiffs supports the offer, another group is opposed to the offer.

In the last week, an opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants and urging the bankruptcy court to disqualify the petition by argument that LTL is not a factor to be in financial trouble.

“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a handful of law firms to try to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan – a plan the vast and growing majority of claimants are in favor of,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Talc powder claims. “The law firms that are behind the filing are pursuing financial interests which are in conflict with, diverge from, and oppose the interests which their clientele. We’ll submit a response before the court of appeals.”

Talc powder claims. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM which boasts more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J, said that J&J’s second bankruptcy effort will fail.

“J&J issue press releases describing how fantastic the plan is but simultaneously insisting that the details of its plan–including the treatment each sick person will receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in the statement. “What does the company have to keep secret?”

Kaplan has commanded the parties to come up with another strategy for reorganization, under the oversight by two mediators.

On February 20, 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s use of Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that would free the company from the thousands of lawsuits concerning its talcum products.

However, in January of this year a federal appeals court overturned the verdict, ruling that the business could not be considered in “financial difficulty.”

After J&J’s contest the U.S. Supreme Court was rejected the same month, J&J was granted a second petition for bankruptcy two hours after. In response to that move, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days, allowing the company to decide whether or not to accept another bankruptcy.

J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B settlement charge for talc.

In the two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases were put on hold. Talc powder claims. The company wants claimants to vote on accepting their settlement. J&J requires 75% approval for the settlement to be approved.

In addition to the gang of talc lawyers who panned the company’s bankruptcy play and the U.S. Trustee is an arm from the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting a motion to dismiss LTL’s second bankruptcy.

In a recent filing, U.S. trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the the bankruptcy court remain “open to honest, but naive debtors.” These doors “are not open to parties that do not have a legitimate goal or who seek to take advantage of the bankruptcy process to delay or hinder their creditors.” Vara continued.

For its part, J&J maintains there is no definitive evidence to suggest that its Talc products, which includes its iconic baby powder, cause cancer. J&J has been taking the products of the market–first to be available in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world next year.

J&J wants to avoid the costly business of going to court. It has prevailed in the majority of cases decided in court, however certain losses have been extremely punishing.
A well-known trial in Missouri led to an $4.7 billion verdict against the drug maker that was later reduced to $2.1 billion following appeals.

Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
Overall, J&J has lost nine trial involving talc that are in appeal or settled. Of the 41 trials, 32 have resulted in winning for J&J either through a mistrial or verdict for a plaintiff that was annulled upon appeal. Talc powder claims. The company also in 2020 negotiated to settle more than 1000 cases for $100 million, Bloomberg published at the time.

Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Talc Powder Claims

Our lawyers are handling the baby powder litigation in every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been going on for a long time. Talc powder claims. The lawsuits contend that the prolonged use of the powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as Shower to Shower Powder along with Shower to Shower, can cause cancer of the ovary in certain women.

This page gives an J&J Talc Power litigation update and discusses how the upcoming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amounts in the ovarian cancer lawsuits.

Has the deadline passed for you to file a talcum powder lawsuit? Many who believe that the deadline has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a no-cost and quick review of your case online.

Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Talc Powder Claims

June 2 2023 Update: During the asbestos talc case that took place in California yesterday, a few technical glitches interrupted the opening statement by the defense attorneys. Talc powder claims. Jurors from home via Zoom however, heard Johnson &Johnson’s lawyer express skepticism about the 70s science that claimed asbestos was present in their product prior to the trial was abruptly closed.

The plaintiff could introduce its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals in talc is inevitable. He claimed that his group had notified J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of chrysotile asbestos within the talc manufactured by the company, though at lower than 0.1 percent. He also discovered more asbestos in the year 1976.

June 1, 2023 Update: Talc powder claims. A trial for the first time since J&J has decided to separate its Talc section and declaring bankruptcy is an important moment for the ongoing litigation story. The trial began on Tuesday in the heartbreaking trial of a young plaintiff, diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of mesothelioma last year, a diagnosis lawyers on both sides of the argument agree is a grave tragedy.

The opening statements exposed the distinct differences between each side’s story. The plaintiff’s attorney took aim towards Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of misleading methods in their research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson tried to alter the definition of asbestos, in spite of internal documents from 1998 and 1994 that show asbestos fibers in the plaintiff’s tissue are included.

Johnson & Johnson’s uncertain $8.9 billion settlement is hanging in the balance as we progression of this trial. Despite the distinctive nature of this mesothelioma-related case and its distinctive issues in comparison to other talcum powder lawsuits ruling in favor of the plaintiff could cause an unintended setback to Johnson & J’s hopes for broad acceptance of their settlement proposal among plaintiffs.

May 31st 2023: Update from Johnson & Johnson’s bankrupted talc unit has vigorously defended the second Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from victims of talc injuries. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, J&J’s subsidiary claimed that the case differed fundamentally from the previous filing. The subsidiary emphasized the record-breaking commitment to $8.9 billion from J&J which is the biggest settlement ever to be made in a mass tort bankruptcy case. Talc powder claims. There was no mention of how the size of the settlement means it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from various plaintiffs’ law companies representing over 600,00 claimants. It is difficult to confirm but is probably incorrect.

May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson and Johnson’s bankruptcy filing in 2021 filing, the first trial concerning its cosmetic talc products that are believed to that contain asbestos is scheduled to begin jury selection on Monday in California with Alameda County Superior Court, a historically good location for plaintiffs. The plaintiff claims that his mesothelioma was triggered by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products and J&J is denying. The trial also includes six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.

May 22nd, 2023 Update Lawyers involved in the 2nd J&J Talc bankruptcy are battling over who should be appointed to the post of future claims representative. This is an important role critical to resolving claim for talc. Talc powder claims. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs throughout the United States was appointed the claims representative in the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team wants Ellis to be appointed to this position in the future, however lawyers representing the talc plaintiffs are protesting due to the fact that Ellis has an interest conflict that would prevent her from being appointed to that post again. The issue stems from the reality that Ellis was involved in the creation of the hotly contested second bankruptcy, which raises doubts about her capability to remain neutral. The reality is this bankruptcy could be tossed out anyway.

May 17, 2023 Update The fake company J&J put together for the talc litigation bankruptcy has informed the New Jersey bankruptcy court that they had allocated $400 million to pay the allegations made by states who accuse the company of deceitful advertising for its talc-based products. Talc powder claims. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement to cancer victims. It’s difficult to envision the scenario in which J&J can push these baby powder settlements through with these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer sounds like a large sum initially, it will not look good when you look at the numbers. This settlement proposal – by our estimates – will not provide victims with much more than $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.

May 15th 2023 update: J&J could be facing lawsuit by an advocacy group that represents cancer patients. Talc powder claims. The group claims that J&J deliberately retracted a $61.5 billion fund-raising agreement in conjunction with its affiliate, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial stress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group asserts this action amounts to a fraudulent transfer of the right to compensation for victims. They will investigate J&J’s actions after the announcement of the decision to dismiss LTL’s first bankruptcy case.

May 10 2023 Update: The following week next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments in a motion dismiss the second bankruptcy filing from J&J LTL Management, J&J’s subsidiary. LTL Management. In the meantime, however, LTL Management has filed an order requiring both sides to participate in a new settlement negotiation in the hope that it will be possible to reach a global settlement agreement reached.

May 5th 2023 Update: The talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to many lawsuits claiming that its talc products cause cancer from asbestos exposure. Talc powder claims. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the firm and it is spending $1 million a month for legal defense. The company’s recent $29 million verdict that was handed down in South Carolina forced it to apply for bankruptcy protection and argue for equitable distribution of assets between talc claimants rather than being seized from the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also declared bankruptcy because of lawsuits.

May 4 2023 update: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to resume negotiations with lawyers who rebuffed the company’s proposed $8.9 billion offer for settlement. It was in Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared in court to discuss the next steps to take in this second case of bankruptcy and Judge Kaplan was pushing for more settlement discussions.

This is the best way to settle these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement could be made. Talc powder claims. However, it’ll require additional money – perhaps billions of dollars of Johnson & Johnson.

Lawyers are divided over whether to accept the proposal and not all clients see the situation the same way their lawyer views it. The second bankruptcy case is expected to fail and Judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing for June to decide whether to remove the bankruptcy after the second.

May 3, 2023 Update: A group of cancer victims who are suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) requested that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to derail litigation regarding talc-related products. The committee representing talc claimants made a motion Tuesday asking the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back the lower court, with instructions to discharge the bankruptcy. Talc powder claims. They also asked that the halted tort litigation against J&J continue to proceed.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its bankruptcy filing was denied by the Third Circuit earlier this year and offered the possibility of an $8.9 billion agreement. The committee believes that the recent ruling which allowed the second Chapter 11 to continue, in addition to halting trials against J&J is a reason for the immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also asked that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s vice president for global litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg saying that J&J intends to file a response in the appeals court calling the request a “desperate and legally flawed plan” by a small number of law firms that have conflicting financial interests.
May 1st, 2023 Update: One most frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn around $8.9 billion. Of course, it’s quite a sum. But there are plenty of victims. Talc powder claims. They are a great arguments for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this last week when two talc cases have resulted in huge verdicts for plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma, a talcum-based powder trial in Oregon led to an award of $18.1 million. A month later, another talc mesothelioma case went to trial in South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million for the plaintiff. It was the same defendant as in these cases: Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the top producers of talc in the U.S.
April 30 2023 Update: J&J initially attempted to pull the litigation over talcum powder into bankruptcy, they came with an offer to set aside $2 billion to settle the case. This was an absurdly low amount. All of the talc plaintiffs were in favor of the proposal. However, this time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 for talc-related plaintiffs if they agree to a bankruptcy settlement and they have the support of a large portion of the talc plaintiffs and their lawyers. Talc powder claims. But 75% of the talc plaintiffs, which is required to approve bankruptcy plans is a difficult road due to the sheer number of lawyers with huge stocks of baby powder litigations opposed to the settlement.

What can be done to end the impasse? More billions.
April 25, 2023 Update: Talc patients have requested a judge to reject their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, insisting that the company is not financially distressed. LTL has filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Talc powder claims. It was the 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January and said that the company was not eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial difficulties.

The claimants argue that LTL’s second Chapter 11 case is an overreach of the bankruptcy system, and that it’s being pursued in bad faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement receives “significant support” from firms representing about 60,000 potential plaintiffs. It’s fair to say that lawyers representing plaintiffs and victims ‘ lawyers are not united over what they believe is an $8.9 billion offer for settlement.

April 21st, 2023 Update: A bankruptcy judge decided the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Although trials for Talc lawsuits are suspended for a minimum period of 60 days and new lawsuits are able to be filed and lawyers are able to begin preparing their cases. Talc powder claims. Judges expressed skepticism about J&J’s ridiculous effort to revive its strategy with a second bankruptcy trial.

April 13th, 2023 update: the major update is about the $8.9 billion over the next 25 years settlement offer. Lawyers representing cancer victims in MDL class action MDL Class Action have pledged to fight the settlement alongside the talc claimants. Why? They feel it’s not enough for 70 000 cancer patients. Talc powder claims. These lawyers argue that J&J could negotiate a greater settlement or settle individual claims if the latest bankruptcy is declared unconstitutional.

There is a different group of lawyers outside of the leadership of the class action. They have amassed the equivalent of tens of thousands of lawsuits. They want to settle now in what many believe to be lower than what the victims should be paid. The argument they make is two-fold. They argue that the settlement, which is about 100 million dollars on average per plaintiff is fair.

This argument isn’t easy to make. The second argument is more force: the victims can be no longer patient and demand to get their money right now.

April 12 2023 Update: People are looking for ways J&J can go through bankruptcy once more. The answer is complex and complicated. But let’s try to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only way to settle both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. That is, it thinks it can get a lower rate in the event of a bankruptcy component that applies pressure to settle. Talc powder claims. In a quest to cover the 400-year span of American past, the company believes that bankruptcy is beneficial to everyone by dispersing settlement payments more equitably and efficiently than trial courts, where some litigants receive significant awards while others receive nothing.

The gist of this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case of the profit-making company that has a subsidiary to take the legal responsibility and declare bankruptcy Congress contemplated when drafting the Bankruptcy Code. It also clarified that the subsidiary was not in financial distress because J&J promises unlimited funding.
This is why J&J took advantage of the funding unlimited part of the contract and didn’t make any promises to fund unlimited lawsuits. J&J claims that its updated financing arrangements with its subsidiary address the appeals court’s concerns, while supplying funds for claim payments. As if providing victims with less money would solve the overall issue.

Attorneys representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue the agreement with what is a defense against legal nonsense by pointing out legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion in assets to LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier ruling. Hyperbole did not go unnoticed: victims’ lawyers call it the largest “fraudulent deal ever in United States history.”

Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really think that the bankruptcy will endure. However, it’s a means of trying to push this $8.9 billion settlement through and maintain pressure on plaintiffs.

April 10 2023 Update Bloomberg offers an informative piece on a law that has been passed that has been passed in New Jersey that is shedding new light on the funding of litigation in the suit for class actions. The funders who fund litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of lawsuits that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) on behalf of talc products. They exchanged for a percentage of any winnings. J&J is now willing the payment of $8.9 billion in settlements for all lawsuits.

The involvement of the funders is public knowledge due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the release of certain details about outside funding backers. The rule aims to address the growing calls for regulation of litigation funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you add up state and federal child powder-related lawsuits. Third-party funding in mass tort claims has its pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are seeing how third-party funding can level the playing field between people as well as large corporations in the courtroom.

April 4, 2023 Update: It’s interesting to watch the worm turning in this case. J&J was hit again this week when an appeals court in the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay in the meantime that J&J appeals an appeal at the U.S. Supreme Court. The automatic stay has frozen hundreds of cases involving talcum powder and stopped any new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin talc-related liabilities off into a bankrupt entity over one year in the past. Talc powder claims. When the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not legal a few months ago, the stay was lifted. J&J wanted to see it remain in effect until an appeal to the SCOTUS appeal. But the answer was no.
April 1, 2023 Update: Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The odds that for the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16th, 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay being in effect, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the class action for talcum powder MDL in over one year. Seven new talc cases were added to the MDL over the last month increasing the number of cases that are pending to 37,522.

February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now demanding that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) launch an investigation to determine how much J&J products containing talc have cost the government over the years.
A recent email to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) in a recent letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten. J&J of ignoring the risks of its talc products for decades while tax dollars were utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the product. The demand comes just weeks following J&J’s dramatic loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Talc powder claims. J&J must begin making reasonable settlement proposals to victims, in order getting this behind. It is a stain on one of the world’s greatest businesses.

February 14 2023 Update: At a hearing today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention to follow the ruling of 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.