You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Which talc is safe. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!
J&J’s proposed talc settlement will pay $400 million to US state AGs. Which Talc Is Safe .
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) has set aside $400 million to address U.S. state consumer protection actions as part of its broader $8.9 billion deal to settle allegations that its Baby Powder and other talc items cause cancer. Which talc is safe.
J&J company subsidiary LTL Management filed a bankruptcy plan in New Jersey late on Monday which outlines how the company intends to pay for different types of cancer patients in an arrangement for bankruptcy. Which talc is safe. J&J has declared that its Talc products are safe, and do not cause cancer. It is attempting for a second time to resolve more than 38,000 cases in bankruptcy, as well as prevent new lawsuits from arising in the future.
The bankruptcy plan of LTL would pay $400 million to an additional trust to settle lawsuits filed by state attorneys general claiming that J&J violated state unfair business practices and consumer protection laws by misleading consumers regarding the quality of its talc products.
Several states had begun consumer protection actions against J&J before LTL’s first bankruptcy filing stopped these investigations from proceeding in 2021. Which talc is safe. New Mexico and Mississippi had already filed actions in the past against Johnson & Johnson before then and states like Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Washington had issued civil investigative requests or subpoenas according to court papers.
New Mexico and Mississippi have filed a petition to end LTL’s bankruptcy as well as cancer patients as well as the U.S. Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog. They have argued that a successful firm like J&J cannot benefit from bankruptcy protections intended for those struggling with debt.
LTL’s first attempt at resolving the bankruptcy-related lawsuits was dismissed following similar arguments, when a U.S. appeals court decided it was not LTL wasn’t in “financial trouble” and thus not eligible under bankruptcy law. Which talc is safe. LTL filed a second bankruptcy less than two hours after the dismissal, saying that the second bankruptcy was different as there was less money available and more support for a settlement.
New Mexico and Mississippi said in their motion to dismiss that LTL’s bankruptcy renewal violates the state’s law enforcement authority by seeking to unilaterally limit the liability of the company in state consumer protection laws.
Which Talc Is Safe
LTL’s recent filings also provided more details on the way in which the company will evaluate and settle cancer claims when the bankruptcy plan is approved.
The most significant payments under the settlement will be $500,000 for patients diagnosed with mesothelioma terminal prior to age 45 and $260,000 for those diagnosed with terminal ovarian cancer before age 45.
The proposed settlement provides discounts based on the severity and type of cancer, the individual’s age, the history of using talc and other factors. Which talc is safe. For instance, a woman who used daily talc products, had an ancestral history of ovarian cancer and was diagnosed stage II ovarian cancer when she was 55 could be in line to receive a payout of $21,125 under the program.
Judge ordains J&J and talc opponents to engage in settlement talks.
Following another round of hearings in Johnson &Johnson’s attempt to employ a Texas Two Step bankruptcy strategy to settle talc lawsuits and federal bankruptcy judge Michael Kaplan has ordered the company and those opposed to the strategy to engage in settlement talks, Bloomberg reports.
With its second bankruptcy attempt for LTL Management, a subsidiary set up by J&J to hold the claims–the company proposed a settlement of $8.9 billion. Which talc is safe. While one group of law firms representing plaintiffs support the proposal, another group is against the settlement.
In the last week, an opposition group, dubbed”the Official Committee of Talc Claimants, urged the bankruptcy court for dismissal of the matter by asserting that LTL is not considered to be in financial distress.
“The filing is a desperate and legally ineffective attempt by a small number of law firms to stop claimants from deciding on the resolution plan, a plan that the vast majority of claimants favor,” J&J’s litigation chief Erik Haas, said in a statement. Which talc is safe. “The law firms who filed these filings have interests in finance that are in conflict with, contradict and are in opposition to the interests they represent. We’ll submit an answer in the appeals court.”
Which talc is safe. Clay Thompson, a lawyer for MRHFM, which boasts more than mesothelioma clients who have sued J&J for bankruptcy, told the second bankruptcy attempt of J&J will fail.
“J&J sends out press releases describing how fantastic its plan is, while demanding that plan details–including what individuals with illnesses would receive–be kept secret,” Thompson said in an announcement. “What do J&J have to keep secret?”
Kaplan has directed the parties to come up with another arrangement plan under the oversight from two mediators.
As of February 2022 Kaplan stated that J&J’s recourse to Chapter 11 to hasten a settlement that will free the company from the tens of thousands of claims related to its talcum-based products.
However, in January of this year, a federal appeals court overturned the verdict, ruling that the company could not be considered in “financial trouble.”
After J&J’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was dismissed in April, J&J declared bankruptcy two hours after. In response, Kaplan froze the lawsuits for 60 days to decide whether to allow to file for bankruptcy again.
J&J’s unstoppable profit engine goes out of control after $6.9B talc litigation charge.
Through Two Chapter 11 attempts, J&J has bought 19 months during which cases were put suspended. Which talc is safe. J&J wants the claimants to decide whether they want to accept the settlement. J&J needs 75% support for the deal to go through.
In addition to the group of talc lawyers who panned the bankruptcy of the company as well, the U.S. Trustee, an arm that is part of the U.S. Department of Justice is also submitting an appeal to dismiss the second bankruptcy case of LTL.
In a recent filing, U.S. Trustee Andrew R. Vara wrote that the bankruptcy courts are “open to honest, but naive debtors.” Those doors “are not available to anyone that lack a legitimate bankruptcy objective or seek to use bankruptcy to hinder or delay their creditors.” Vara continued.
For its part, J&J maintains there is no proof conclusive that their Talc products, which includes its iconic baby powder, can cause cancer. J&J has taken the products of the market–first in North America in 2020–and the rest of the world this year.
J&J wants to avoid the costly business of going to trial. The company has won most of the cases decided during trial, however, some losses have been very harsh.
A well-known trial in Missouri produced a $4.7 billion verdict against the drug company and was later lowered to $2.1 billion following appeals.
Johnson & Johnson faces high-stakes hearing over ‘Texas Two Step’ talc strategy: report
In all, J&J has lost nine trial cases in talc which are being appealed or concluded. Of the 41 trials, 32 ended with the favor of J&J as well as mistrials or verdict of a plaintiff overturned upon appeal. Which talc is safe. Separately, the company in 2020 moved to settle more than 1000 cases for 100 million dollars, Bloomberg reported at the time.
Talcum Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit – Which Talc Is Safe
Our lawyers are handling baby powder lawsuits in every state. The lawsuits involving talcum powder on behalf of Johnson & Johnson have been ongoing for many years. Which talc is safe. The lawsuits assert that long-term use of talcum powder (or “talc”), the active ingredient found in products such as the Baby Powder as well as Shower to Shower which can cause ovarian cancer among some women.
This page gives a J&J update on the talc power litigation and examines how the coming bankruptcy ruling impacts the ultimate settlement amount in the cases of ovarian cancer.
Has the deadline passed for you to start a lawsuit against talcum powder? Many who believe that the statute of limitations has passed to file a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson are wrong. Call us at 800-553-882 or request a free and quick review of your case online.
Johnson and Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuit Update 2023 – Which Talc Is Safe
June 2 2023 Update: During an asbestos talc court trial held that took place in California yesterday, some technical issues interrupted the opening statements of the defense attorneys. Which talc is safe. The jurors, attending from their homes via Zoom however, heard Johnson & Johnson’s lawyer expressing skepticism about the 70s science claiming asbestos was present in their product before the proceedings abruptly ended.
In the meantime, the plaintiff was able to introduce its first expert witness Arthur Langer. Langer stated that the presence of other minerals with talc is inevitable. He testified that his team had notified J&J in the year 1971 about the presence of asbestos chrysotile in the talc of the company, but in just 0.1 percent. He also found more asbestos in 1976.
June 1st, 2023 Update: Which talc is safe. First trial after J&J decided to spin off its Talc division, and then declare bankrupt is a pivotal moment of the ongoing lawsuit story. The trial started yesterday in the poignant case of a young, 24-year-old plaintiff, diagnosed with an aggressive and rare form of mesothelioma last year. which lawyers on both sides believe is a harrowing tragedy.
Opening statements laid bare distinct differences between each side’s narrative. The attorney representing the plaintiff aimed his ire on Johnson & Johnson, alleging the use of deceptive strategies in its research practices as well as throughout the litigation procedure. The attorney claims that, according to, Johnson & Johnson attempted to alter the definition of asbestos, despite internal documents dating back to the year 1978 and 1994 indicating that asbestos fibers that were found in the tissue of the plaintiff are included.
Johnson &J’s highly uncertain $8.9 billion settlement deal hangs in the balance with the progression of this trial. Despite the unique nature of this mesothelioma lawsuit and its distinctive issues in comparison to other talcum powder lawsuits and a decision in favor of the plaintiff could be a serious setback to J&J’s expectations of widespread acceptance of the settlement they have proposed among plaintiffs.
May 31st, 2023 Update: Johnson and Johnson’s bankrupt talc unit strongly defended their Second Chapter 11 filing in the in the face of challenges from the talc injury plaintiffs. In an appeal to the New Jersey bankruptcy court, the subsidiary argued that the filing was distinct from the prior filing. It emphasized the unprecedented commitment to $8.9 billion to J&J the largest ever settlement in the history of a mass tort bankruptcy. Which talc is safe. There was no mention of how this amount implies that it is a fair settlement. J&J also claimed that it received support from a variety of plaintiffs’ law firms representing over sixty thousand claimants. It is difficult to confirm however it is likely to be incorrect.
May 24 2023 Update: As of Johnson &J Johnson’s bankruptcy filing, the very first trial regarding its cosmetic talc products allegedly that contain asbestos is scheduled to begin jury selection on Monday, California with Alameda County Superior Court, the most favored court for plaintiffs. The plaintiff asserts that his mesothelioma was caused by asbestos exposure through J&J’s products which that the company is denying. The trial also involves six retailers who are accused of selling talc-based products.
May 22nd, 2023 Update: Lawyers involved in the second J&J talc bankruptcy are disputing who should be appointed to the position of future claims representative, an important role essential to the resolution of the claims involving talc. Which talc is safe. Randi Ellis, a lawyer who frequently appears in MDLs throughout the country was appointed the claims representative during the first bankruptcy. J&J’s defense team would like Ellis to be appointed in that position yet again, but the lawyers for the talc plaintiffs are objecting on the grounds that Ellis has an interest conflict which should stop her from being appointed to that post once more. This conflict is rooted in the reality that Ellis was believed to have been involved in drafting the hotly contested second bankruptcy, which raises concerns about her ability to be neutral. It’s true that the bankruptcy will be dismissed in the end.
May 17th, 2023 Update: The pretend company J&J made up to handle the bankruptcy of talc informed an New Jersey bankruptcy court that they have designated $400 million to settle the claims brought by states accusing the company of deceitful advertising for its talc-based products. Which talc is safe. That’s an $8.5 billion settlement for cancer sufferers. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where J&J can push these baby powder settlements through at these numbers. While J&J’s $8.5 billion offer may seem like a huge sum initially, it may not look good when you do the math. This settlement proposal – by our rough calculations, would not provide victims with much more than an average settlement $100,000 per instance. This isn’t enough.
May 15 2023, Update J&J could be facing suit from an advocacy group representing cancer patients. Which talc is safe. The group contends that J&J intentionally withdrew an $61.5 billion funding agreement with its subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to simulate financial distress and validate the unit’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The group argues that this act is a fraud transfer of the rights of compensation for victims. They intend to investigate J&J’s actions in the wake of the denial of LTL’s first bankruptcy case.
May 10 2023 Update: Next week, next week, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey will hear oral arguments on a motion to dismiss the second bankruptcy filing by J&J subsidiaries LTL Management. However, in the meantime LTL Management has filed an Order requiring both sides to participate in a new settlement mediation to see if the global settlement can be brokered.
May 5 2023 Update: Talc producer Whittaker, Clark & Daniels filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to several lawsuits alleging that its talc products cause cancer due to asbestos exposure. Which talc is safe. More than 2700 people have filed lawsuits against the company and it is paying $1 million per month to defend itself. The company’s recent $29million settlement at the Supreme Court of South Carolina forced it to seek bankruptcy protection, arguing for a fair distribution of assets between the claimants of talc instead of being seized from the receiver. Other talc suppliers have also been forced to file for bankruptcy as a result of lawsuits.
May 4, 2023, Update U.S. The bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan has directed Johnson & Johnson to reopen talks with lawyers who turned down the company’s $8.9 billion agreement. In Trenton, New Jersey yesterday the parties appeared before a judge to discuss next steps in their second bankruptcy matter. Judge Kaplan encouraged further settlement talks.
This is the best way to resolve these claims for J&J. A baby powder settlement can get done. Which talc is safe. But it’ll need more money – billions of dollars – by Johnson & Johnson.
Lawyers are divided on whether or not to accept the plan and not every client sees the issue the same way their lawyer sees it. The second bankruptcy case is destined to fail the judge Kaplan has scheduled a hearing in June to decide if he will discharge the bankruptcy for the 2nd time.
May 3, 2023 Update: A group representing cancer victims suing Johnson & Johnson (J&J) asked for they request that the Third Circuit halt the bankruptcy filed by J&J subsidiary LTL Management, claiming it is an attempt to halt litigation over talc products. The group representing the claimants filed a motion on Tuesday, asking for the Third Circuit to consider their case and to send it back before a court of lower jurisdiction with instructions to dismiss the bankruptcy. Which talc is safe. They also asked that the stoppage of tort litigation against J&J should be permitted to proceed.
LTL applied for Chapter 11 protection once again after its first bankruptcy filing was rejected in the Third Circuit earlier this year with an $8.9 billion settlement. The committee says that the recent decision allowing LTL’s 2nd Chapter 11 to continue, as well as halting the trials against J&J and J&J, requires an immediate Third Circuit review. The US Trustee also requested that an New Jersey bankruptcy court dismiss the LTL bankruptcy case. J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, Erik Haas, was quoted by Bloomberg declaring that J&J intends to file a statement to the appeals court calling the request an “desperate and legally insufficient plan” by a small number of law firms that have conflicting financial interests.
May 1 2023 Update: A frequently asked question is how could plaintiffs and their lawyers be able to turn off $8.9 billion. Of course, that’s a lot of money. However, there are lots of victims. Which talc is safe. They are a great case for plaintiffs. We were reminded of this recently with two talc trials led to huge verdicts for the plaintiffs. In February mesothelioma cases, a talcum powder trial in Oregon ended in the verdict worth $18.1 million. A month later, another talc mesothelioma case went to the court at South Carolina and resulted in a verdict of $29million in favor of plaintiff. The defendant in both cases was Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. which is one of the most prominent manufacturers of talc in U.S.
April 30th 2023 Update: In the year 2023, when J&J first attempted to drag the lawsuit over talcum powder into bankruptcy, it was met with an offer to put aside $2 billion to settle the case. The sum was ridiculously low. There was no one among the talc victims who were in favor of the offer. This time, J&J has increased the offer to $8.9 in the event that the talc victims agree to a bankruptcy settlement and also has the support of a substantial segment of the talc plaintiffs as well as their lawyers. Which talc is safe. However, 75% of plaintiffs in the talc category, which is needed for approval of the bankruptcy plan is not an easy task due to the sheer number of lawyers with huge collections of baby powder-related lawsuits, opposed against the proposed settlement.
What is the solution to this impasse? More billions.
April 25 2023 Update Talc patients have sought a court order to disqualify their Chapter 11 case filed by LTL Management LLC, a absurdly fabricated Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, declaring that the company isn’t financially distressed. LTL filed for Chapter 11 to settle tens of thousands of claims that J&J’s baby products caused cancer. Which talc is safe. The 3rd Circuit dismissed its first Chapter 11 case in January in a ruling that said the company wasn’t eligible to receive bankruptcy relief because it was unable to demonstrate financial distress.
The claimants contend that the second Chapter 11 case is an misuse of the bankruptcy system and that it’s being pursued in bad faith. J&J states that the bankruptcy settlement has “significant support” from the firms that represent approximately 60,000 people who are claiming. It is fair to say that the plaintiffs’ attorneys and victims are divided over their disagreement over the $8.9 billion deal.
April 21st, 2023 Update A bankruptcy judge decided the company Johnson & Johnson must face new lawsuits alleging that it offered a baby powder with a contaminant that caused cancer. Although trials for talc lawsuits are paused for at least 60 calendar days, new lawsuits can be filed, and lawyers may begin to prepare their cases. Which talc is safe. The judge expressed skepticism over J&J’s pathetic attempt to revive its strategy by filing a second bankruptcy trial.
April 13th 2023: Update on the most important update is about the $8.9 billion over the course of 25 years of settlement. Lawyers representing cancer patients within the MDL group action promised to fight the settlement alongside talc claimants. Why? They argue that it’s not enough money for those suffering from cancer who are 70,000. Which talc is safe. The lawyers say that J&J should negotiate a larger settlement or litigate individual claims in the event that the latest bankruptcy is dismissed.
However, there is a second set of lawyers who are not part of the top leadership in this class action. These lawyers have collectively amassed tens of thousands of cases. The group is seeking to settle in what many believe to be far less than what these victims deserve. Their argument appears to be twofold. First, they argue that the settlement – about the equivalent of $100,000 per plaintiff – is fair.
This argument isn’t easy to make. However, their second argument has more teeth: victims can no longer wait and want their money today.
April 12 2023 Update: People are seeking out how J&J can go through bankruptcy again. The answer is complex and convoluted. However, let’s attempt to explain it simply.
Johnson & Johnson asserts that bankruptcy is the only option to settle both present and future talc-related lawsuits definitively. Also, it believes that it will be less expensive should there be the bankruptcy element which applies pressure to negotiate a settlement. Which talc is safe. Moving past more than 400 years in American history, the firm argues that bankruptcy benefits all parties because it distributes settlement payments more equitably and efficiently than trial courts, which are where litigants get significant settlements while others get nothing.
The basic tenet in this 3rd Circuit decision was this is not a case – the profit-making company that has an entity to assume the legal risk and declare bankruptcy Congress considered when it was drafting the Bankruptcy Code. However, it also stated that the entity was financially trouble because J&J promised unlimited funding.
This is why J&J jumped on the unlimited funding portion of the holding and didn’t make any promises to provide unlimited funding for the litigation. The company claims that revised financing arrangements with its subsidiary addresses the concerns of the appellate court, while offering funds to pay claims. As if offering victims lesser money could solve the overall issue.
Attorneys representing cancer patients who are against the agreement argue this by arguing that the plaintiff is countering legal nonsense legal nonsense: J&J fraudulently transferred $50 billion of assets from LTL Management to circumvent the appeals court’s earlier decision. Hyperbole is not exempt: victims’ lawyers call this the biggest “fraudulent transfer in United States history.”
Despite the legal jargon, J&J does not really believe that this bankruptcy will last. However, it’s a means to push for this $8.9 billion settlement and keep the pressure on plaintiffs.
April 10, 2023 Update: Bloomberg offers an informative piece on a law that has been passed within New Jersey that is shedding new light on litigation funding in the Class action suit. Funders for litigation Virage Capital Management and TRGP Capital invested in hundreds of claims that were brought against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) concerning talc products in exchange for a percentage of any wins. J&J is now willing the payment of $8.9 billion to settle all lawsuits.
The involvement of funders is public knowledge due to the New Jersey court rule requiring the disclosure of certain information regarding outside funding backers. The law is designed to address the growing calls for the regulation of lawsuit funders. J&J has more than 60,000 claims when you add up federal and state Baby Powder lawsuits. Third-party financing in mass tort cases has its pros and pros and. But there is no question that we are witnessing how third-party funding could level the playing field between people and big corporations in court.
April 4, 2023 Update: It’s pleasing to see the worm turn in this case. J&J has taken another blow this week when it was found that the Third Circuit denied J&J’s request to extend the automatic stay during the time that J&J appeals a bankruptcy ruling at the U.S. Supreme Court. This automatic stay froze thousands of talcum cases and stopped new lawsuits from getting filed ever since J&J began the controversial plan to spin the talc liabilities into a bankrupt entity over one year ago. Which talc is safe. When it was decided that the 3rd Circuit ruled that this bankruptcy was not valid only a few months back, the stay was removed. J&J was hoping to have it stayed in place until the SCOTUS appeal. However, the answer was no.
April 1st, 2023 Update Johnson & Johnson announced it will appeal its 3rd Circuit bankruptcy loss to the U.S. Supreme Court last week. The likelihood that of the Supreme Court is willing even to consider the appeal? Low.
March 16 2023 Update: with the bankruptcy stay officially lifted, the first new cases have been filed and transferred into the talcum powder class action MDL in over one year. Seven new talc-related lawsuits were joined to the MDL in the past month which brings the total number of cases that are pending to 37,522.
February 25 2023 Update This morning, a Congressmen from Tennessee is now requesting that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) initiate an investigation into the cost J&J Talc products have cost the government in the decades.
in a letter to the GAO, Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Ten.) has accused J&J of failing to recognize the dangers of its talc products for decades while tax dollars were utilized to treat people injured by exposure to the products. The lawsuit comes just a few weeks after J&J’s major loss in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.
Which talc is safe. J&J needs to start making reasonable settlements to victims, in order to put all of this behind. It’s a mark on one of the greatest firms.
February 14 , 2023 Update: At an appearance today at the hearing in New Jersey, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan announced his intention following the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
You May be Entitled to Significant Compensation Which talc is safe. Johnson & Johnson powders were proven to contain asbestos (a cancer causing agent) and the company failed to notify users of the cancer risk. $2 BILLION has already been awarded to claims. Free To File! No Fees Unless A Settlement Is Awarded!